Re: [v6ops] Checking an outcome on the list
Cong Liu <gnocuil@gmail.com> Fri, 08 November 2013 02:15 UTC
Return-Path: <gnocuil@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E7C2721E80AF for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 18:15:26 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id z+VFgq9mg17O for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 18:15:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qc0-x230.google.com (mail-qc0-x230.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::230]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2AF2311E8170 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 18:15:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qc0-f176.google.com with SMTP id s19so1224747qcw.21 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 07 Nov 2013 18:15:25 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=KrXrC/7yAI3B9+KSBoqCoIBLpN2kpzxn0Hmx6BWbu5E=; b=CRfEIajskJ9mh1iCZyaIm+PaiyNVxCbpjCOE+dcm71YPQpnTCTqv/R16foWfCwefA8 CtmIv+KnnIkf6qUeagTgCtCHOfrU4laSf2krtdawijZJjfMGMlbYl74owKxxNukF9daO jHoPJpT+ZjOpJFf3XbZM7oz72vko00Com5vK1iMhNV0nChzAIygrAp7VsThz0X582Y5j H37KBWFX7F39caT5FWlEB1qSn8qQKBaYGTpYbWuE2g7z9TuG6+INAYdlin1Iqzqix3W5 y9Ky+8ktjKCkrY7KQU9w5ed0alrOB4dF77QEDJ62qJ4F6kd3pmdULvZ3zSzyBlneY5Hf JluA==
X-Received: by 10.224.124.134 with SMTP id u6mr19433606qar.79.1383876925504; Thu, 07 Nov 2013 18:15:25 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.96.185.33 with HTTP; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 18:15:05 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <0D5C911E-5EB3-4F1F-82B1-B2F486AE3E46@cisco.com>
References: <0D5C911E-5EB3-4F1F-82B1-B2F486AE3E46@cisco.com>
From: Cong Liu <gnocuil@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2013 18:15:05 -0800
Message-ID: <CAF+sHxF55xyy1Omt0GrJj4yJaW-JBqGrVKGp2RRqgKvrxoqeMA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11c29e9c8ec1f404eaa0f420"
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Checking an outcome on the list
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 02:15:27 -0000
Hi all, 2013/11/7 Fred Baker (fred) <fred@cisco.com> > We say we check f2f decisions on the mailing list to ensure that everyone > had a chance to speak. Let's do that. > > In IETF 88, we discussed a number of drafts. Of these: > - draft-ietf-v6ops-balanced-ipv6-security will start a two week WGLC on > Monday morning New Zealand time. > I support > - draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-experience appears to have reached closure. We > have one additional revision coming, and then will do a 1 week last call, > probably early December. > I support > - draft-liu-bonica-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-problem documents what seems to be > a real problem. > 1) In your opinion, should > draft-liu-bonica-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-problem be adopted as WG draft > draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-problem and matured into a problem statement > to present to 6man? > Yes > 2) In your opinion, should v6ops invite a draft (which we might > adopt as a working group draft) that gives current guidance to operators > regarding the use of DHCP and SLAAC in their networks? > Yes > - Should draft-chen-v6ops-ipv6-roaming-analysis be adopted as WG draft > draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-roaming-analysis? > Yes > > I'll collect up the responses in a week and make a determination based on > that. I'm interested in your viewpoint, whether positive or negative. If > you would prefer to send it privately to v6ops-chairs@tools.ietf.org, > that works too. > > _______________________________________________ > v6ops mailing list > v6ops@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops > > Best Regards, Cong
- Re: [v6ops] Checking an outcome on the list Brian E Carpenter
- [v6ops] Checking an outcome on the list Fred Baker (fred)
- Re: [v6ops] Checking an outcome on the list Mikael Abrahamsson
- Re: [v6ops] Checking an outcome on the list Cong Liu
- Re: [v6ops] Checking an outcome on the list Dave Michaud
- Re: [v6ops] Checking an outcome on the list Sheng Jiang
- Re: [v6ops] Checking an outcome on the list Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] Checking an outcome on the list Hui Deng
- Re: [v6ops] Checking an outcome on the list Ida Leung
- Re: [v6ops] draft-chen-v6ops-ipv6-roaming (was: C… Alexandru Petrescu
- Re: [v6ops] draft-chen-v6ops-ipv6-roaming Tore Anderson