Re: [v6ops] Checking an outcome on the list

Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se> Fri, 08 November 2013 01:44 UTC

Return-Path: <swmike@swm.pp.se>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 477AD11E815A for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 17:44:34 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.299
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.299 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_13=0.6]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oU7tjUYCq-bp for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 17:44:33 -0800 (PST)
Received: from uplift.swm.pp.se (ipv6.swm.pp.se [IPv6:2a00:801::f]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3EA5011E8288 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Nov 2013 17:43:03 -0800 (PST)
Received: by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix, from userid 501) id 4174B9C; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 02:43:00 +0100 (CET)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by uplift.swm.pp.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 324F29A; Fri, 8 Nov 2013 02:43:00 +0100 (CET)
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 02:43:00 +0100
From: Mikael Abrahamsson <swmike@swm.pp.se>
To: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
In-Reply-To: <0D5C911E-5EB3-4F1F-82B1-B2F486AE3E46@cisco.com>
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.02.1311080242171.26054@uplift.swm.pp.se>
References: <0D5C911E-5EB3-4F1F-82B1-B2F486AE3E46@cisco.com>
User-Agent: Alpine 2.02 (DEB 1266 2009-07-14)
Organization: People's Front Against WWW
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org WG" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Checking an outcome on the list
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2013 01:44:35 -0000

On Thu, 7 Nov 2013, Fred Baker (fred) wrote:

>  - draft-ietf-v6ops-balanced-ipv6-security will start a two week WGLC on Monday morning New Zealand time.

Support.

>  - draft-ietf-v6ops-nat64-experience appears to have reached closure. We have one additional revision coming, and then will do a 1 week last call, probably early December.

Support.

>  - draft-liu-bonica-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-problem documents what seems to be a real problem.
>      1) In your opinion, should draft-liu-bonica-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-problem be adopted as WG draft draft-ietf-v6ops-dhcpv6-slaac-problem and matured into a problem statement to present to 6man?

Yes.

>      2) In your opinion, should v6ops invite a draft (which we might adopt as a working group draft) that gives current guidance to operators regarding the use of DHCP and SLAAC in their networks?

Yes.

>  - Should draft-chen-v6ops-ipv6-roaming-analysis be adopted as WG draft draft-ietf-v6ops-ipv6-roaming-analysis?

Yes.

-- 
Mikael Abrahamsson    email: swmike@swm.pp.se