Re: [v6ops] IPv4 trajectory

Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com> Thu, 02 April 2015 18:09 UTC

Return-Path: <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2832D1A0056 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 11:09:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.983
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.983 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.001, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HELO_EQ_FR=0.35, NML_ADSP_CUSTOM_MED=0.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_SOFTFAIL=0.665] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id xuIB3HQb0qLd for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 11:09:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from oxalide-out.extra.cea.fr (oxalide-out.extra.cea.fr [132.168.224.8]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D04731A002D for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 11:09:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (pisaure.intra.cea.fr [132.166.88.21]) by oxalide.extra.cea.fr (8.14.2/8.14.2/CEAnet-Internet-out-2.3) with ESMTP id t32I9WxM009310; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 20:09:32 +0200
Received: from pisaure.intra.cea.fr (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by localhost (Postfix) with SMTP id 00C892076BA; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 20:10:28 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from muguet1.intra.cea.fr (muguet1.intra.cea.fr [132.166.192.6]) by pisaure.intra.cea.fr (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6F4D2074AC; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 20:10:27 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (is010446-4.intra.cea.fr [10.8.33.116]) by muguet1.intra.cea.fr (8.13.8/8.13.8/CEAnet-Intranet-out-1.2) with ESMTP id t32I8xOF016069; Thu, 2 Apr 2015 20:09:32 +0200
Message-ID: <551D85B7.5030406@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 20:08:55 +0200
From: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.5.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Mark Andrews <marka@isc.org>
References: <63C03012-C7DD-497E-A1EF-019711E95FD0@cisco.com> <551BFBA9.5070103@gmail.com> <4A8F9E83-B481-44FC-AD70-BFFF43EC2614@lists.zabbadoz.net> <551CE36A.50706@gmail.com> <BAE229DE-22AC-4E64-8E70-CA182104364B@lists.zabbadoz.net> <551D8001.8060901@gmail.com> <20150402180046.4F6E52C5011F@rock.dv.isc.org>
In-Reply-To: <20150402180046.4F6E52C5011F@rock.dv.isc.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/P0vl7nhrRkYV1ueF4BR9gzzslEg>
Cc: "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>, v6ops@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [v6ops] IPv4 trajectory
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 02 Apr 2015 18:09:37 -0000

Le 02/04/2015 20:00, Mark Andrews a écrit :
[...]
>> And Windows' hosts file containing 127?
>
> Do you want to rip all the A records out of the DNS as well?

Right.  That is necessary in order to obtain IPv6-only.  But it looks
like a huge task to remove all A records from DNS.

This makes think about removing all 500k IPv4 routes from the DFZ - also
a huge task.

> If the getaddrinfo() is properly written the IPv4 addresses will be
> filtered from the responses with AI_ADDRCONFIG set so it shouldn't
> matter if it is still there.

That would still be IPv4 taking space on disk; taking bandwidth on
network up to Client (AI_ filtering is local, right?).

>>>>> so it=92s not a big deal anymore).
>>>>
>>>> I beg to differ, as I see it this is still far away from an
>>>> ideal where only IPv6 were present in the computer.
>>>
>>>
>>> Well, better start living it today and we can have a lot better
>>> operational discussions on the end-node (client/server systems)
>>> side. I have 7 IPv4 addresses left in use in total for all my
>>> infrastructure (and could condense it to 2 or 3 if I wanted
>>> really badly).  And the only reason I keep those is for the
>>> ipv4-only world to reach NS/MX/Web.  But that=92s just me.
>>> Leave a /27 for a SMB and be good ;-)
>>
>> Congratulations.
>>
>> I have no BSD here, except for the proprietary derivatives (ios,
>> windows, etc).  For all code that I can modify it's linux.  Given
>> that I can't turn off IPv4 until linux gives a means to.
>
> You have a editor, a compiler and the source.  You have the means to
> do it.  Whether you have the skill / inclination to do it is another
> matter.

Ressource may be there, and the pleasure of removing; but reticence
worrying doing it too early is there too.  Maybe someone somewhere still
needs this little IPv4 and it will break otherwise; wouldnt touch it yet.

Alex

>
>> Do you know whether ios has such a means to turn off fully IPv4?
>>
>> Alex
>>
>>>
>>> =97 Bjoern A. Zeeb                                  Charles
>>> Haddon Spurgeon: "Friendship is one of the sweetest joys of
>>> life. Many might have failed beneath the bitterness of their
>>> trial  had they not found a friend."
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________ v6ops mailing list
>>  v6ops@ietf.org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops