IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] IPv4 trajectory

James Woodyatt <jhw@nestlabs.com> Wed, 01 April 2015 23:30 UTC

Return-Path: <jhw@nestlabs.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2C7D81ACD23 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 16:30:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.378
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.378 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MNd_sBU58e81 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 16:30:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-x22f.google.com (mail-ob0-x22f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4003:c01::22f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E9411ACD0A for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 16:30:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by obbec2 with SMTP id ec2so103333720obb.3 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 16:30:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=nestlabs.com; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=WSwaltLl3GoqpwcBwe/Ea3AHsZ6RnQOB2EL2HXbRuR4=; b=IVN1i/hXhTF4dYrm392rKYCzOzMyWnyJgKkCLbV09Mc/jG9TuS4qfspRK26/B5HfTs 9rZ3FwoP9aHrvyDmdCZcqQsEY/pR6Sh0KTNB4WZQbMD9ad0NPeBTqzj66zxCLUsJexjN q+zmMNK/Ad3/1pJBzDJjZVqcB4j91q2gEqWB4=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=WSwaltLl3GoqpwcBwe/Ea3AHsZ6RnQOB2EL2HXbRuR4=; b=HPcDPKCDq1OmA01EpzRcKYkn9rXASmNe9q051K+IzaEnHJ2Kpx8PnCY3MOuzMPMhdm Vhf9n2gsLcytWZpMuIxU42grPomPpGTL4xeHJEU0HbPP3fgUDbjD8W4f1FwVCNeCUbYM FDfjw7uiKBhCcJrAiwJtovcwelIPr52uUv8VAlrCR/PCsZkNcO/jjAJrRdeQMXWd45fg rrPlcImhpRwiKOZu2Q5afJdG5iFC7EKMLxEM/UmANk7iEmo+PKGVmpb9CdDDdMA3jha6 CgudYvVZkcSHoLPazgdBZIiU6V+gLccM8Xzc721rNC91i8O36jiVsEl5Z3tOrvPW/yrN 6J3w==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQn/+GQ9JC7NSH9VCS6+PDNgn6UdWVylznEx+KHsIaUu/qf++TQU0HpVGYl7zEhTHpp8scTV
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.182.88.136 with SMTP id bg8mr43660073obb.86.1427931045685; Wed, 01 Apr 2015 16:30:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.76.177.229 with HTTP; Wed, 1 Apr 2015 16:30:45 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <551BFBA9.5070103@gmail.com>
References: <63C03012-C7DD-497E-A1EF-019711E95FD0@cisco.com> <551BFBA9.5070103@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 18:30:45 -0500
Message-ID: <CADhXe5395L-HC-bQ7JzgVijLwBaovz7xJ27Rp7LrbHbOp98D6A@mail.gmail.com>
From: James Woodyatt <jhw@nestlabs.com>
To: Alexandru Petrescu <alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e0111bd76be05e10512b21a32"
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/zOQEQwPfVfomhtWMYB5ttecwKug>
Cc: IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] IPv4 trajectory
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Apr 2015 23:30:47 -0000

On Wed, Apr 1, 2015 at 9:07 AM, Alexandru Petrescu <
alexandru.petrescu@gmail.com> wrote:

>
> It is customary to see current computers having both an IPv6 stack and an
> IPv4 stack on them.  But some computers only have IPv4, whereas the rest
> have IPv4 and IPv6 stacks.  There are no computers (to my knowledge) which
> have only IPv6 stacks.
>

Sigh. Computing platforms where the only network interfaces are
6LoWPAN-over-foo. These exist today, and they are not just laboratory toys.


-- 
james woodyatt <jhw@nestlabs.com>
Nest Labs, Communications Engineering

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email