IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] IPv4 trajectory

"Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com> Fri, 03 April 2015 17:34 UTC

Return-Path: <fred@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D9A181ACDFF; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 10:34:50 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -114.5
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-114.5 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_HTML_ATTACH=0.01, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id I8FAA1udovrP; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 10:34:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com [173.37.86.78]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC4881ACDFE; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 10:34:45 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=58378; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1428082486; x=1429292086; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=WoXRvoSiKdpVUMQY8RrZ0RT107rk8zZOwULvoWofQkw=; b=j9zrDuZoqc3eZrxE3gs8+6yQNErEs1S/akdkYEYrxZPT+iVyHSDJRE9m CEpNpzI45uZFAAMfevzXvZzCixpShJV30jax/lILDWGQ3UzjhIirq+eWF 1RwRhhx0Wm+VrhKQlMNYTZpGgNZyklTFGGQ1oEuNNVABitSXHi1BFnAwL I=;
X-Files: transition.xml, transition.txt, transition.html, signature.asc : 13207, 13426, 27796, 487
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0DgBQAozh5V/4ENJK1cgkhDUlwFgxDAV4IEhXMKAoEvTAEBAQEBAX6EHwEBBBoJBEAGDBACAQgSJgEJAgIyFw4CBA4FDoghDbUZmA0BAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEXiymEFhEBJxgSBwmCXy+BFgWGU4gJgg+BboEzVIQKggGBHREpgnuMMoNIIoNvbwGBCjl/AQEB
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.11,518,1422921600"; d="xml'217?asc'217?html'217,217?txt'217,217?scan'217,217,208,217"; a="408976421"
Received: from alln-core-9.cisco.com ([173.36.13.129]) by rcdn-iport-7.cisco.com with ESMTP; 03 Apr 2015 17:34:44 +0000
Received: from xhc-aln-x05.cisco.com (xhc-aln-x05.cisco.com [173.36.12.79]) by alln-core-9.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id t33HYiO1009444 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL); Fri, 3 Apr 2015 17:34:44 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x09.cisco.com ([169.254.9.67]) by xhc-aln-x05.cisco.com ([173.36.12.79]) with mapi id 14.03.0195.001; Fri, 3 Apr 2015 12:34:44 -0500
From: "Fred Baker (fred)" <fred@cisco.com>
To: "George, Wes" <wesley.george@twcable.com>
Thread-Topic: [v6ops] IPv4 trajectory
Thread-Index: AQHQbjR4SwYTQhluR0mkL23V7qY82g==
Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 17:34:43 +0000
Message-ID: <028FC16B-8D26-4CDE-8F17-19148B20B99C@cisco.com>
References: <D1401A6F.90498%Lee@asgard.org> <551AF135.3060602@gmail.com> <B7AD5376-A2CF-43DF-9A84-B75CFDDBD6FF@cisco.com> <551B37B9.4090400@gmail.com> <B0D588CB-0448-44FE-BE3F-4D0B890B5756@cisco.com> <CAD6AjGQXt6DwmYkbDKyB-9SJzL5znsHTSJAG8=smPS8yZRpqhA@mail.gmail.com> <D143FC8D.4C060%wesley.george@twcable.com>
In-Reply-To: <D143FC8D.4C060%wesley.george@twcable.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.19.64.117]
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_21832243-2299-4097-964E-D62C1CC7BF87"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha1"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/rAbLKwfDj3DI-_zX9PPoks2w7eA>
Cc: IPv6 Ops WG <v6ops@ietf.org>, "sunset4@ietf.org" <sunset4@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] IPv4 trajectory
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2015 17:34:51 -0000

Dumb question. There were at least a couple of comments early in the thread about “we should have an ID that says this”. I hacked one together, basically an updated version of the email.

(1) are we interested enough to actually have a draft, or does it just seem cute?
(2) if we’re interested enough to have a draft, what working group?
(3) if we’re interested enough to have a draft, it seems to me that I should have 1-3 co-authors, from SP, enterprise, and perhaps CDN environments, that can comment with some authority about the process and considerations in their environments. I would want the co-authors to add text as they deem it appropriate.

See attached.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email