IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Call for adoption: draft-peng-v6ops-hbh

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Thu, 09 September 2021 21:08 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 278E33A0844 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Sep 2021 14:08:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.099
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.099 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kToYcAPxQbiv for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 9 Sep 2021 14:08:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pf1-x42e.google.com (mail-pf1-x42e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::42e]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 015B43A0845 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 9 Sep 2021 14:08:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-pf1-x42e.google.com with SMTP id g14so2886227pfm.1 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Thu, 09 Sep 2021 14:08:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=subject:to:references:from:message-id:date:user-agent:mime-version :in-reply-to:content-language:content-transfer-encoding; bh=xtHPtnHl3wet7efKnB5edWk4L/x2BOZfR3LLuv3LTQo=; b=lIh57Jm7IlmZpIT6L2hq0dNvcE/vTcXRme7VUtc1ZjocpRqFP7WjroGb8UgqlnfIco YL69gAc0HEwZjYk2vsLb7/WqUEZk8KpB9sbMb5qrH2AiyX9DNIlgkXUcKRk7Noo04c3Q zJXi02etNEkbgUPp8uf7Y8ffZ8PXdP/CR967bv/DUxtLx8KEZ4VVGuHLLKQtc1m3l6X9 lHn5RwlNV7d5SwWhPihmFYyYvr11lQK6E5ejHsKywcr1L1btgUqoT/FMnwhDilqV8Oij QGRwOm5N2gAqz8mYHP/pEvOYUhhAFQA4QqLLEvUvDfhMxq6sDsI7qOUiI4zJS4jKTFLs +3kw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=xtHPtnHl3wet7efKnB5edWk4L/x2BOZfR3LLuv3LTQo=; b=bkJ5sCh6Ltrg53jD6FWncGJBWC2hg09N4rUXAMmPPTvLizOtyo+I1pdNxaMmde498u iIqmB+6E0EXY+EpUZJZp/UlWsXU0Fm/ZjHJBdH3QzYm1GNvONtVFB3ZiCJ5vwdVDg9rW 1yrwH9LJENJ0t9+IABHq1GCqE3Wz7z0MSg8TVD7iCm9WR8aQfFWdhGQElEmwJ4cQJVN2 P44DRAdMo2gYinfOsCo1m2TdhIcML7UkKijK9Dazlv36MVjbN1JJtBgSqdkBxMOmMTHD +a0IvUz+KOBuboFlYMrb6cVX6A6eMLKHONg/D5YnMpsBWX6k4pIDoTvubyA5oq1mDpq8 G7nw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532Bpo5mGCgyRA1dM+jQ20NeI80x7V1U9aKDr1P4Sb+sx8OPHIdv xMvT53a7JfVe9kPAj3GOV06PjjJMa54=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzxUnzAnwhXEjcAaAbKsLk9x3pEU35rxStmqOHfQCxTzq+myiROdbd8d2feEyJa6ZgrEMnlKg==
X-Received: by 2002:a63:d40a:: with SMTP id a10mr4398540pgh.7.1631221716217; Thu, 09 Sep 2021 14:08:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2406:e003:11aa:d701:80b2:5c79:2266:e431? ([2406:e003:11aa:d701:80b2:5c79:2266:e431]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a23sm2991009pfo.120.2021.09.09.14.08.34 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 09 Sep 2021 14:08:35 -0700 (PDT)
To: Ron Bonica <rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>, "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
References: <BL0PR05MB5316375D7503A85477DF874AAED59@BL0PR05MB5316.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <ca24a2d5-d347-7a7a-8f5a-55bd53dd4525@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 09:08:31 +1200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <BL0PR05MB5316375D7503A85477DF874AAED59@BL0PR05MB5316.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/Q8qiSYUu4RwxwCj2IPMlzjU0uFA>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Call for adoption: draft-peng-v6ops-hbh
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2021 21:08:43 -0000

I'm afraid I don't understand at all what this draft proposes. To be explicit:

>  8. Migration Strategies 

Migration from what to what?

> 1. The source of the HBH options header encapsulation.The information to be carried in the HBH options header needs to be first categorized and encapsulated into either control options or forwarding options, and then encapsulated in different packets.
...
> The edge nodes should check whether the packet contains an HBH header with control or forwarding option. 
What different packets? How are control and forwarding options distinguished? Is this proposal suggesting two kinds of HBH option? If so it belongs in 6man. If not, I have no idea what it actually suggests. 

Regards
   Brian

On 10-Sep-21 05:10, Ron Bonica wrote:
> Folks,
> 
>  
> 
> This message initiates a call for adoption for draft-peng-v6ops-hbh (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-peng-v6ops-hbh/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-peng-v6ops-hbh/>).
> 
>  
> 
> Please post comments by September 24, 2021.
> 
>  
> 
>                                                                    Fred and Ron
> 
>  
> 
> 
> Juniper Business Use Only
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email