Re: [v6ops] Call for adoption: draft-peng-v6ops-hbh
otroan@employees.org Fri, 10 September 2021 09:10 UTC
Return-Path: <otroan@employees.org>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D6083A0A42 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 02:10:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id bncLKqnsRw90 for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 02:10:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from clarinet.employees.org (clarinet.employees.org [198.137.202.74]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6E8CD3A0A4A for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 02:10:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from astfgl.hanazo.no (ti0389q160-5225.bb.online.no [95.34.0.166]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by clarinet.employees.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E17424E11BA2; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 09:10:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from smtpclient.apple (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by astfgl.hanazo.no (Postfix) with ESMTP id F403F601B9C0; Fri, 10 Sep 2021 11:10:27 +0200 (CEST)
From: otroan@employees.org
Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Apple-Mail=_ED60F2EE-E2DA-4AB5-9B4A-74D63E061A21"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg="pgp-sha256"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\))
Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 11:10:27 +0200
References: <BL0PR05MB5316375D7503A85477DF874AAED59@BL0PR05MB5316.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
To: Ron Bonica <rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>, "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <BL0PR05MB5316375D7503A85477DF874AAED59@BL0PR05MB5316.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Message-Id: <63E81B57-73E0-4692-B813-ECE1F04F1F5D@employees.org>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/gVshLARJ_2CQeOetyzIU7Aoec7Y>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Call for adoption: draft-peng-v6ops-hbh
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 10 Sep 2021 09:10:37 -0000
We have: draft-ietf-6man-hbh-header-handling-03 IPv6 Hop-by-Hop Options Extension Header That in combination with RFC7045 led up to the relaxed rules for processing of HBH in RFC8200. There's also: draft-hinden-6man-hbh-processing-01 IPv6 Hop-by-Hop Options Processing Procedures And then this draft which draft-peng-v6ops-hbh seems to be still referring to as it's hinting at "control plane" and "data plane" HBH options. draft-li-6man-hbh-fwd-hdr-01 Hop-by-Hop Forwarding Options Header What I struggle with for draft-peng-v6ops-hbh is figuring out what it says that hasn't already been said before. O. > On 9 Sep 2021, at 19:10, Ron Bonica <rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org> wrote: > > Folks, > > This message initiates a call for adoption for draft-peng-v6ops-hbh (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-peng-v6ops-hbh/). > > Please post comments by September 24, 2021. > > Fred and Ron > > > Juniper Business Use Only > _______________________________________________ > v6ops mailing list > v6ops@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
- [v6ops] Call for adoption: draft-peng-v6ops-hbh Ron Bonica
- Re: [v6ops] Call for adoption: draft-peng-v6ops-h… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Call for adoption: draft-peng-v6ops-h… Warren Kumari
- Re: [v6ops] Call for adoption: draft-peng-v6ops-h… Huzhibo
- Re: [v6ops] Call for adoption: draft-peng-v6ops-h… 秦壮壮(联通北京市北京市分公司)
- Re: [v6ops] Call for adoption: draft-peng-v6ops-h… Xiejingrong (Jingrong)
- Re: [v6ops] Call for adoption: draft-peng-v6ops-h… Pascal Thubert (pthubert)
- Re: [v6ops] Call for adoption: draft-peng-v6ops-h… Stefano Previdi
- Re: [v6ops] Call for adoption: draft-peng-v6ops-h… otroan
- Re: [v6ops] Call for adoption: draft-peng-v6ops-h… Pengshuping (Peng Shuping)
- Re: [v6ops] Call for adoption: draft-peng-v6ops-h… Pengshuping (Peng Shuping)
- Re: [v6ops] Call for adoption: draft-peng-v6ops-h… Chengli (Cheng Li)
- Re: [v6ops] Call for adoption: draft-peng-v6ops-h… Warren Kumari
- Re: [v6ops] Call for adoption: draft-peng-v6ops-h… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [v6ops] Call for adoption: draft-peng-v6ops-h… Vasilenko Eduard
- Re: [v6ops] Call for adoption: draft-peng-v6ops-h… Bob Hinden
- Re: [v6ops] Call for adoption: draft-peng-v6ops-h… Tom Herbert
- Re: [v6ops] Call for adoption: draft-peng-v6ops-h… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [v6ops] Call for adoption: draft-peng-v6ops-h… Pengshuping (Peng Shuping)
- Re: [v6ops] Call for adoption: draft-peng-v6ops-h… Chongfeng Xie
- Re: [v6ops] Call for adoption: draft-peng-v6ops-h… Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [v6ops] Call for adoption: draft-peng-v6ops-h… Bob Hinden
- Re: [v6ops] Call for adoption: draft-peng-v6ops-h… Lizhenbin
- Re: [v6ops] Call for adoption: draft-peng-v6ops-h… Pengshuping (Peng Shuping)
- Re: [v6ops] Call for adoption: draft-peng-v6ops-h… Gyan Mishra
- Re: [v6ops] Call for adoption: draft-peng-v6ops-h… Ron Bonica