IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [v6ops] Call for adoption: draft-peng-v6ops-hbh

Chongfeng Xie <xiechf@chinatelecom.cn> Sat, 11 September 2021 09:39 UTC

Return-Path: <xiechf@chinatelecom.cn>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 056EA3A09AC for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Sep 2021 02:39:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.899
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.899 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id W34klbRMgrSG for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sat, 11 Sep 2021 02:39:37 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from chinatelecom.cn (prt-mail.chinatelecom.cn [42.123.76.222]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3F0AB3A0994 for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Sat, 11 Sep 2021 02:39:36 -0700 (PDT)
HMM_SOURCE_IP: 172.18.0.218:42038.306537212
HMM_ATTACHE_NUM: 0000
HMM_SOURCE_TYPE: SMTP
Received: from clientip-42.88.132.64 (unknown [172.18.0.218]) by chinatelecom.cn (HERMES) with SMTP id 0FE4F28008D; Sat, 11 Sep 2021 17:39:27 +0800 (CST)
X-189-SAVE-TO-SEND: 66040161@chinatelecom.cn
Received: from ([172.18.0.218]) by app0025 with ESMTP id 87f43b7f21824c74a074f669beae35fa for rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org; Sat, 11 Sep 2021 17:39:32 CST
X-Transaction-ID: 87f43b7f21824c74a074f669beae35fa
X-Real-From: xiechf@chinatelecom.cn
X-Receive-IP: 172.18.0.218
Sender: xiechf@chinatelecom.cn
From: Chongfeng Xie <xiechf@chinatelecom.cn>
Message-Id: <A17F0A13-E0FF-4B6A-840B-EB1E4383CA9C@chinatelecom.cn>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Apple-Mail=_1599D57A-C662-486D-A072-0B85BBC7E9A8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 14.0 \(3654.120.0.1.13\))
Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2021 17:39:25 +0800
In-Reply-To: <BL0PR05MB5316375D7503A85477DF874AAED59@BL0PR05MB5316.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Cc: "v6ops@ietf.org" <v6ops@ietf.org>
To: Ron Bonica <rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>
References: <BL0PR05MB5316375D7503A85477DF874AAED59@BL0PR05MB5316.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3654.120.0.1.13)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/v6ops/lh-wCUSt9QfDTgBSLB3_UA76YHQ>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] Call for adoption: draft-peng-v6ops-hbh
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/v6ops/>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 11 Sep 2021 09:39:42 -0000

Hi，folks，
As a co-author，I support the adoption of this draft. I think the HBH option header can be considered as a valuable container for carrying the information facilitating the introduction of new services or meeting other demands.

Best regards
Chongfeng


> 2021年9月10日 上午1:10，Ron Bonica <rbonica=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org> 写道：
> 
> Folks,
>  
> This message initiates a call for adoption for draft-peng-v6ops-hbh (https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-peng-v6ops-hbh/ <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-peng-v6ops-hbh/>).
>  
> Please post comments by September 24, 2021.
>  
>                                                                    Fred and Ron
>  
> 
> Juniper Business Use Only
> _______________________________________________
> v6ops mailing list
> v6ops@ietf.org <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email