Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-servin-v6ops-monitor-ds-ipv6

Arturo Servin <aservin@lacnic.net> Mon, 15 July 2013 11:49 UTC

Return-Path: <aservin@lacnic.net>
X-Original-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AF57421E809F for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 04:49:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.3
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.300, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jiSB3It6pi6k for <v6ops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 04:49:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.lacnic.net.uy (mail.lacnic.net.uy [IPv6:2001:13c7:7001:4000::3]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 212CF21E809D for <v6ops@ietf.org>; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 04:49:56 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from Arturos-MacBook-Pro.local (unknown [IPv6:2800:af:ba30:ce73:5cbc:d667:d95a:64ad]) by mail.lacnic.net.uy (Postfix) with ESMTP id 20FAF308478; Mon, 15 Jul 2013 08:49:32 -0300 (UYT)
Message-ID: <51E3E1E0.9090203@lacnic.net>
Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 08:49:52 -0300
From: Arturo Servin <aservin@lacnic.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130620 Thunderbird/17.0.7
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "Diego R. Lopez" <diego@tid.es>
References: <201307131245.r6DCj0d01032@ftpeng-update.cisco.com> <51E15A35.2090603@lacnic.net> <E6D8B95470ED0845B3376F61DCAB1A049CD16B1A@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet>
In-Reply-To: <E6D8B95470ED0845B3376F61DCAB1A049CD16B1A@EX10-MB2-MAD.hi.inet>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.5.1
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-Information: Please contact the ISP for more information
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner: Found to be clean
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-SpamCheck:
X-LACNIC.uy-MailScanner-From: aservin@lacnic.net
Cc: "<v6ops@ietf.org>" <v6ops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [v6ops] new draft: draft-servin-v6ops-monitor-ds-ipv6
X-BeenThere: v6ops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: v6ops discussion list <v6ops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/v6ops>
List-Post: <mailto:v6ops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops>, <mailto:v6ops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 15 Jul 2013 11:49:56 -0000

Diego,

    Thanks for the comments.

    I will try to incorporate some changes before the deadline. Some
questions in line.
   
On 7/15/13 6:46 AM, Diego R. Lopez wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'd say collecting the current state-of-the-art and the operational practice in monitoring will be of great help, especially when it comes to the tricky inequalities you mention... I really hope to see a comprehensive collection of these detail, collected as you say from direct experiences across the WG and other fora.
>
> Regarding the current contents, I'd like to ask you to include considerations for at least:
>
> 1) The usage of SDN (OpenFlow in particular) as an alternative technique, probably under 2.3
    I have never thought about it but it seems plausible. Do you have a
reference, perhaps some previous work about this topic?

>
> 2) The implications of the usage of local addresses and privacy-protection address allocation techniques
    Noted.
>
> And there is always the matter of cross-provider or federated monitoring, that I'd say is not that close even in v4 space, and that probably would deserve some discussion as well...

    I'll ask some operators that I know have virtual services how they
do it, but if you have some pointers or references would be very greate
>
> Be goode,
>
>
    Thanks for the comments, as I said we will try to incorporate as
many as possible before the deadline.

Regards,
as