Re: [v6ops] Enterprise Guidance on IPv6 (draft-chkpvc-enterprise-incremental-ipv6-00)

[Victor Kuarsingh <[e-mail]>]

Fred,

I would (personally) tend to agree.  Given the details from
"draft-templin-v6ops-ispos", would a reference to that document fit the
bill?  

Regards,

Victor K



On 12-06-13 12:20 PM, "Templin, Fred L" <[e-mail]> wrote:

>Hi Lee,
>
>If you do decide to pursue this further, here are two
>documents that fit this space:
>
>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-templin-v6ops-isops/
>https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc5214/
>
>Fred
>[e-mail]
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf
>>Of
>> Lee Howard
>> Sent: Monday, June 11, 2012 11:37 AM
>> To: 'Victor Kuarsingh'; 'IPv6 Operations'
>> Subject: [v6ops] Enterprise Guidance on IPv6 (draft-chkpvc-enterprise-
>> incremental-ipv6-00)
>> 
>> When discussed in Taipei, it seemed there was real interest in updating
>> guidance for
>> enterprise networks.  From lack of list discussion, it now appears
>>there's
>> no interest in
>> the WG.
>> 
>> 1.  Are people interested?
>> 2.  Should we let it die?
>> 3.  Should we pursue other avenues of publication?
>> 
>> Lee
>> 
>> > -----Original Message-----
>> > From: [e-mail] [mailto:[e-mail]] On Behalf
>> Of
>> Victor
>> > Kuarsingh
>> > Sent: Monday, March 26, 2012 7:42 AM
>> > To: IPv6 Operations
>> > Subject: Re: [v6ops] draft-chkpvc-enterprise-incremental-ipv6-00
>> >
>> > IPv6 WG,
>> >
>> > I would like to kick off some comments on this draft for other group
>> members to comment.
>> >
>> > I do think (Bias noted) that this material is useful for Enterprises
>>who
>> need to being and/or
>> > move their IPv6 deployments.  Many (of those I have worked with thus
>> far)
>> are bogged
>> > down with personnel who are overwhelmed with what it may take to get
>> IPv6
>> moving on
>> > their networks.
>> >
>> > The draft breaks the challenge down by areas of focus (rolled into
>> > "Phases") which can help put this large challenge into bite size
>>chunks
>> for them. The draft
>> > also provides some valid contextual information around
>> > IPv6 and highlights areas which should be looked at.
>> >
>> > Given the good momentum we now have in the operator space, it would be
>> good to see this
>> > move forward into the Enterprise space.  I think such documents can
>>help
>> many of those still
>> > waffling (too many to count) to start acting.
>> >
>> > Regards,
>> >
>> > Victor K
>> >
>> >
>> > On 12-03-22 8:02 AM, "Tim Chown" <[e-mail]> wrote:
>> >
>> > >Hi,
>> > >
>> > >Due to a typo in the draft name, this draft didn't hit Fred's
>>automated
>> > >WG tools, so the authors would like to raise the draft on the list
>>now
>> > >with a view to securing a slot in Paris to discuss its value and
>> content.
>> > >
>> > >In Taipei there was a comment in the WG session that there is no
>> > >up-to-date v6ops guidance on enterprise networks, while other
>>scenarios
>> > >do have such texts.  So at the mic I invited people to join an effort
>> > >to put something together.  There is a good breadth of experience
>> > >across the people who stepped forward, and the result is available as
>> > >
>> > 
>>>http://www.ietf.org/id/draft-chkpvc-enterprise-incremental-ipv6-00.txt
>> > >
>> > >Does the WG think the subject matter of this draft is one we should
>> > >pursue in the WG?  If so, is the structure and content appropriate?
>>We
>> > >need some positive feedback and comments in order for Fred to
>>schedule
>> > >us time in Paris.
>> > >
>> > >We have had a couple of people contact us off-list offering to help
>> > >develop the content.  But we'd like some feedback from the WG before
>> > >investing more time in doing so.  The -00 text is somewhat "rough",
>>but
>> > >we feel it could be polished into something quite useful for the
>> > >community.
>> > >
>> > >Tim
>> > >
>> > >_______________________________________________
>> > >v6ops mailing list
>> > >[e-mail]
>> > >https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>> >
>> >
>> > _______________________________________________
>> > v6ops mailing list
>> > [e-mail]
>> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> v6ops mailing list
>> [e-mail]
>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/v6ops