IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [VCARDDAV] AD review of draft-ietf-vcarddav-carddav-07.txt

Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name> Tue, 01 September 2009 19:56 UTC

Return-Path: <cyrus@daboo.name>
X-Original-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C8EF128C9D6 for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Sep 2009 12:56:59 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.279
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.279 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.320, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GNEzTnP7L5Vr for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Sep 2009 12:56:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from daboo.name (daboo.name [151.201.22.177]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9906928C9CF for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Sep 2009 12:56:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by daboo.name (Postfix) with ESMTP id 64A081898758; Tue, 1 Sep 2009 15:56:25 -0400 (EDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at daboo.name
Received: from daboo.name ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (chewy.mulberrymail.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3jPQkJRgrrV6; Tue, 1 Sep 2009 15:56:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from caldav.corp.apple.com (unknown [17.101.32.44]) by daboo.name (Postfix) with ESMTP id D80631898751; Tue, 1 Sep 2009 15:56:22 -0400 (EDT)
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2009 15:56:19 -0400
From: Cyrus Daboo <cyrus@daboo.name>
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
Message-ID: <46F6B54FB97EDFC2555E8CF3@caldav.corp.apple.com>
In-Reply-To: <4A9D557A.3050905@isode.com>
References: <4A888C37.50400@isode.com> <4A888FEF.4070701@isode.com> <A1B0D39DCAA502CB4FE572FB@socrates.local> <4A9D557A.3050905@isode.com>
X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.1.0a1 (Mac OS X)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline; size="620"
Cc: CardDAV <vcarddav@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [VCARDDAV] AD review of draft-ietf-vcarddav-carddav-07.txt
X-BeenThere: vcarddav@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF vcarddav wg mailing list <vcarddav.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vcarddav>
List-Post: <mailto:vcarddav@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2009 19:56:59 -0000

Hi Alexey,

--On September 1, 2009 6:10:18 PM +0100 Alexey Melnikov 
<alexey.melnikov@isode.com> wrote:

>> I have just posted draft -08 that contains all the changes listed
>> here. Hopefully this is now ready for IESG last call?
>
> I didn't hear answer to my main question: why is this document requiring
> support for vCard 3.0 and not for vCard 4.0?

It needs to support both. Legacy vCard data will be around for a long time 
and we don't know how quickly clients will adopt it. We have CardDAV 
implementations already using vCard 3 so I think that is strong 
justification for keeping it as-is.

-- 
Cyrus Daboo

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email