IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [VCARDDAV] draft-ietf-vcarddav-carddav: should support for vCard 4.0 be recommended?

Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im> Thu, 10 September 2009 15:03 UTC

Return-Path: <stpeter@stpeter.im>
X-Original-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 32DF63A6998 for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 08:03:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.64
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.64 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.041, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AmdPiWyx5d9y for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 08:03:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from stpeter.im (stpeter.im [207.210.219.233]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 456773A6975 for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 08:03:46 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dhcp-64-101-72-247.cisco.com (dhcp-64-101-72-247.cisco.com [64.101.72.247]) (Authenticated sender: stpeter) by stpeter.im (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1B9E940D09; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 09:04:07 -0600 (MDT)
Message-ID: <4AA90E20.6010606@stpeter.im>
Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 08:33:04 -0600
From: Peter Saint-Andre <stpeter@stpeter.im>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
References: <4A888C37.50400@isode.com> <4A888FEF.4070701@isode.com> <A1B0D39DCAA502CB4FE572FB@socrates.local> <4A9D557A.3050905@isode.com> <46F6B54FB97EDFC2555E8CF3@caldav.corp.apple.com> <4A9D8490.90807@isode.com> <4AA78584.4070905@isode.com> <4AA7924E.2060405@gmx.de>
In-Reply-To: <4AA7924E.2060405@gmx.de>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0
OpenPGP: url=http://www.saint-andre.com/me/stpeter.asc
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: CardDAV <vcarddav@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [VCARDDAV] draft-ietf-vcarddav-carddav: should support for vCard 4.0 be recommended?
X-BeenThere: vcarddav@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF vcarddav wg mailing list <vcarddav.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vcarddav>
List-Post: <mailto:vcarddav@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 15:03:47 -0000

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 9/9/09 5:32 AM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> Alexey Melnikov wrote:
>> ...
>>> I would really like to hear clear consensus from the WG that either
>>> this should stay as is, or that [I-D.ietf-vcarddav-vcardrev] should
>>> be a SHOULD.
>>
>> While I haven't heard strong support for my proposal to say that
>> support for vCard 4.0 is a SHOULD, I haven't heard anybody saying
>> otherwise.
> 
> I support that requirement, in case that matters :-).

Same here. Let's join the modern world. ;-)

Peter

- --
Peter Saint-Andre
https://stpeter.im/


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkqpDiAACgkQNL8k5A2w/vzjPgCg7LRAa0EiBrzTpnccuZvv/9Di
SNQAoOfyoymen5jurkFDAzspGBgs9ucu
=eY3t
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email