IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [VCARDDAV] draft-ietf-vcarddav-carddav: should support for vCard 4.0 be recommended?

Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca> Tue, 01 September 2009 20:38 UTC

Return-Path: <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
X-Original-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3C703A68A6 for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Sep 2009 13:38:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.548
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.548 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.052, BAYES_00=-2.599, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ht504n97gZAY for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 1 Sep 2009 13:38:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from jazz.viagenie.ca (jazz.viagenie.ca [IPv6:2620:0:230:8000::2]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BC1C23A6867 for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Tue, 1 Sep 2009 13:38:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by jazz.viagenie.ca (Postfix, from userid 8) id 8A93229E15F1; Tue, 1 Sep 2009 16:38:30 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ringo.viagenie.ca (ringo.viagenie.ca [IPv6:2620:0:230:c000::67]) by jazz.viagenie.ca (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8096C29E15F1; Tue, 1 Sep 2009 16:38:30 -0400 (EDT)
From: Simon Perreault <simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
Organization: Viagénie
To: vcarddav@ietf.org
Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2009 16:38:29 -0400
User-Agent: KMail/1.11.4 (Linux/2.6.29.6-217.2.3.fc11.x86_64; KDE/4.2.4; x86_64; ; )
References: <4A888C37.50400@isode.com> <46F6B54FB97EDFC2555E8CF3@caldav.corp.apple.com> <4A9D8490.90807@isode.com>
In-Reply-To: <4A9D8490.90807@isode.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
Message-Id: <200909011638.30039.simon.perreault@viagenie.ca>
Subject: Re: [VCARDDAV] draft-ietf-vcarddav-carddav: should support for vCard 4.0 be recommended?
X-BeenThere: vcarddav@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF vcarddav wg mailing list <vcarddav.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vcarddav>
List-Post: <mailto:vcarddav@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 01 Sep 2009 20:38:21 -0000

On Tuesday 01 September 2009 16:31:12 Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> I would really like to hear clear consensus from the WG that either this
> should stay as is, or that [I-D.ietf-vcarddav-vcardrev] should be a SHOULD.

As an implementer of CardDAV and author of vCard 4, I can say that adding 
support for vCard 4 to an implementation of CardDAV supporting vCard 3 is 
easy. The syntax is near enough that changes are minimal.

+1 for SHOULD

Simon
-- 
DNS64 open-source   --> http://ecdysis.viagenie.ca
STUN/TURN server    --> http://numb.viagenie.ca
vCard 4.0           --> http://www.vcarddav.org

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email