IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [VCARDDAV] draft-ietf-vcarddav-carddav: should support for vCard 4.0 be recommended?

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> Wed, 09 September 2009 11:32 UTC

Return-Path: <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
X-Original-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vcarddav@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 79DA028C14A for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 04:32:12 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.407
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.407 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-1.808, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hcyXpLG5CPRT for <vcarddav@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 04:32:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.gmx.net (mail.gmx.net [213.165.64.20]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 36C3A28C315 for <vcarddav@ietf.org>; Wed, 9 Sep 2009 04:32:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 09 Sep 2009 11:32:41 -0000
Received: from mail.greenbytes.de (EHLO [192.168.1.117]) [217.91.35.233] by mail.gmx.net (mp037) with SMTP; 09 Sep 2009 13:32:41 +0200
X-Authenticated: #1915285
X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX19syGsczPxsdP3OAc0CIdwdaLKL3SDIpcQrkdsPYE iZJrLUsw3vZp7Y
Message-ID: <4AA7924E.2060405@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 13:32:30 +0200
From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; de; rv:1.8.0.4) Gecko/20060516 Thunderbird/1.5.0.4 Mnenhy/0.7.4.666
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Alexey Melnikov <alexey.melnikov@isode.com>
References: <4A888C37.50400@isode.com> <4A888FEF.4070701@isode.com> <A1B0D39DCAA502CB4FE572FB@socrates.local> <4A9D557A.3050905@isode.com> <46F6B54FB97EDFC2555E8CF3@caldav.corp.apple.com> <4A9D8490.90807@isode.com> <4AA78584.4070905@isode.com>
In-Reply-To: <4AA78584.4070905@isode.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0
X-FuHaFi: 0.67
Cc: CardDAV <vcarddav@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [VCARDDAV] draft-ietf-vcarddav-carddav: should support for vCard 4.0 be recommended?
X-BeenThere: vcarddav@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF vcarddav wg mailing list <vcarddav.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vcarddav>
List-Post: <mailto:vcarddav@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vcarddav>, <mailto:vcarddav-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 Sep 2009 11:32:12 -0000

Alexey Melnikov wrote:
> ...
>> I would really like to hear clear consensus from the WG that either 
>> this should stay as is, or that [I-D.ietf-vcarddav-vcardrev] should be 
>> a SHOULD.
> 
> While I haven't heard strong support for my proposal to say that support 
> for vCard 4.0 is a SHOULD, I haven't heard anybody saying otherwise.

I support that requirement, in case that matters :-).

 > ...

BR, Julian

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email