IETF Logo Mail Archive

[vmeet] timeframe

Dave CROCKER <dhc@dcrocker.net> Thu, 14 May 2009 22:28 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: vmeet@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vmeet@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6105B3A6AF7 for <vmeet@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 May 2009 15:28:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.229
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.229 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.370, BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Q0FLmgev19jm for <vmeet@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 14 May 2009 15:28:12 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from sbh17.songbird.com (mail.mipassoc.org [IPv6:2001:470:1:76:0:ffff:4834:7146]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A76E33A69C8 for <vmeet@ietf.org>; Thu, 14 May 2009 15:28:11 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (adsl-68-122-70-68.dsl.pltn13.pacbell.net [68.122.70.68]) (authenticated bits=0) by sbh17.songbird.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id n4EMTbpW010361 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Thu, 14 May 2009 15:29:43 -0700
Message-ID: <4A0C9B51.2010508@dcrocker.net>
Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 15:29:37 -0700
From: Dave CROCKER <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: John Leslie <john@jlc.net>
References: <20090507175356.GG32848@verdi> <4A08BC3C.9070302@dcrocker.net> <200905121242.n4CCgnj4013481@cichlid.raleigh.ibm.com> <20090513025653.GD14375@verdi> <4A0C5831.5060801@dcrocker.net> <20090514221220.GA70521@verdi>
In-Reply-To: <20090514221220.GA70521@verdi>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.0 (sbh17.songbird.com [72.52.113.17]); Thu, 14 May 2009 15:29:43 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: vmeet@ietf.org
Subject: [vmeet] timeframe
X-BeenThere: vmeet@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
List-Id: IETF remote participation meeting services discussion <vmeet.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet>, <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/vmeet>
List-Post: <mailto:vmeet@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/vmeet>, <mailto:vmeet-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 May 2009 22:28:13 -0000

John Leslie wrote:
>    Our timeframe is too short to rule out "hacks" for Stockholm. For
> the IETF after that, we should be able to automate things.


The timeframe for vmeet is whatever we set it to be.  My own participation came 
from suggesting that we work towards replacing at least one IETF week with 
virtual meetings.  There is no way that is happening immediately.  It's a goal, 
but we are not trying to meet it instantly.

Since there already are virtual interim meetings, here too we do not have to 
have an "immediate" deadline.

That's why I think we can and should target capabilities beyond what the IETF 
currently use, balancing against easy, reliable use so that folks will not feel 
that it is a burden to participate.

d/


-- 

   Dave Crocker
   Brandenburg InternetWorking
   bbiw.net

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email