[vnrg] Review of draft-shin-virtualization-meta-arch-01.txt

"Martin Stiemerling" <Martin.Stiemerling@neclab.eu> Tue, 08 June 2010 07:55 UTC

Return-Path: <Martin.Stiemerling@neclab.eu>
X-Original-To: vnrg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: vnrg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 873DF28C0F8 for <vnrg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Jun 2010 00:55:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 2.301
X-Spam-Level: **
X-Spam-Status: No, score=2.301 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.001, MANGLED_LIST=2.3]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dqDnTvKyEV9x for <vnrg@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Jun 2010 00:55:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp0.neclab.eu (smtp0.neclab.eu [195.37.70.41]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AA70028C0E1 for <vnrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 8 Jun 2010 00:55:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by smtp0.neclab.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5D3DC2C000C0D for <vnrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 8 Jun 2010 09:55:23 +0200 (CEST)
X-Virus-Scanned: Amavisd on Debian GNU/Linux (atlas2.office)
Received: from smtp0.neclab.eu ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (atlas2.office [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id Ih7LkTm7jWwd for <vnrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 8 Jun 2010 09:55:23 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from VENUS.office (mx2.office [192.168.24.15]) by smtp0.neclab.eu (Postfix) with ESMTP id 416772C000C08 for <vnrg@irtf.org>; Tue, 8 Jun 2010 09:55:18 +0200 (CEST)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.5
Content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 09:54:41 +0200
Message-ID: <547F018265F92642B577B986577D671C014B9959@VENUS.office>
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Thread-Topic: Review of draft-shin-virtualization-meta-arch-01.txt
Thread-Index: AcsG39myQFBjdxFTTdWET16jGwMJfw==
From: Martin Stiemerling <Martin.Stiemerling@neclab.eu>
To: vnrg@irtf.org
Subject: [vnrg] Review of draft-shin-virtualization-meta-arch-01.txt
X-BeenThere: vnrg@irtf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Virtual Networks Research Group \(VNRG\) discussion list" <vnrg.irtf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/vnrg>, <mailto:vnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.irtf.org/mail-archive/web/vnrg>
List-Post: <mailto:vnrg@irtf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:vnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.irtf.org/mailman/listinfo/vnrg>, <mailto:vnrg-request@irtf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Jun 2010 07:55:23 -0000

[writing as individual RG member and not as chair]

Dear all,

Here is a brief review of draft-shin-virtualization-meta-arch-01.txt.

- Section 1, 1st paragraph: this describes abstraction but not virtualization.
- Section 1, page 3, bullet list: how does this related to VNs?
- Section 1.1: too narrow for VN and it mixes VNs with programmable networks.

- Section 2: First para: de-ossification may be one motivation but is in IMHO not the motiviation. 
- Section 2: VNs are not necessarily programmable networks. 

- Section 3: The requirements are too high-level. It would be good to get more detailed requirements and where (from what system) these requirements are.
- Section 4: It's too high-level. A good use case would describe a VN use case and the resulting challenges and requirements

I personally do not yet see this document to be the RG problem statement draft at this point of time. 

The draft misses some important points:
- what are some use cases you have in mind (system and what it does)
  - e.g., testbed virtualization, operator-scale, Internet-scale, etc?
- what components are you using
- how do these components interact
- what about the existing work, e.g., VPNs, L2 link bundling technologies, virtual routers
- what are the problems?

In general: I do not yet see that this draft is really a problem statement. It makes a start and its worth keep working on it, but needs more thoughts and discussions.

  Martin


martin.stiemerling@neclab.eu

NEC Laboratories Europe - Network Research Division
NEC Europe Limited | Registered Office: NEC House, 1 Victoria Road, London W3 6BL | Registered in England 2832014