IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [websec] draft-ietf-websec-key-pinning

Joseph Bonneau <jbonneau@gmail.com> Wed, 27 August 2014 00:16 UTC

Return-Path: <jbonneau@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 340D41A0277 for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 17:16:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mfGCWsn0MqDm for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 17:16:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yh0-x229.google.com (mail-yh0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4002:c01::229]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFF891A0263 for <websec@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 17:16:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yh0-f41.google.com with SMTP id b6so12798973yha.0 for <websec@ietf.org>; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 17:16:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=YPxAlCZJnayJXUcnV05CoiZnkml9d8bXNxrlJUBUpL0=; b=EhRzVpmFn97hPuekeI1WbHo4zZGgvwdwG7UX37uVZhDydySw1/6f2aOs50uNL1qMGf 3aG361NEaZksAGguCQTBYx21IoZ0J5CVWaQBWcZOCKh0kAXZm4ov4NeIN1qxEqun+5Zc REPTFM+aGkkIxq0iZG2Sd8Uvt2jdE7hNqqWtQR3rTh3GdzvFpoYCqWkh4UnsqhxKPIJU b/0tghSNhs/cZ9l5pCxR0CeoHFEzHvWyLmy9YCrj0sTValKEBiuJBLlW8bZkj6l4gFfp 2E4spTSq6P7BOj9DM8bwKvJp9qca3pI9Mzxe1+s7rsbTD8I2UMlY4TxFGZ/932eYPPqx TkzQ==
X-Received: by 10.52.137.2 with SMTP id qe2mr19768768vdb.11.1409098575019; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 17:16:15 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.220.219.1 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Aug 2014 17:15:53 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CA+cU71nN-=TjWZZovMUcTrXMF1gBcYFppnfnsaP7hKw+6AUCLQ@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BAY169-DS62B5941BF0A9024964BB0AEEE0@phx.gbl> <CACvaWvYHAmpX0f9_m-sckhWz9tcyWA-sxVR4vP-A5UcAQmnYXA@mail.gmail.com> <BAY169-DS45F1C5036AB09CA44D0BC7AEDF0@phx.gbl> <CA+cU71k-pLD315dzfd_c74QM51c7V2VQkZ26PiXUTqntmESD=A@mail.gmail.com> <CAOuvq20mZkScvPDKjsa1eZ6rdoHxf_+oF=gpaOcvkOTaYhyj6Q@mail.gmail.com> <CA+cU71mW47OvqRNTbw-H7u-F_k6hMv4xr0XcMYAS_V6eE8brwA@mail.gmail.com> <CAOuvq20C+T9Ejf_KUsfPRtUWL7ggCF0UWJZkGr5xGBEkERXeRQ@mail.gmail.com> <BAY169-DS45D73636AA204DEEABC876AEDC0@phx.gbl> <CAOuvq20kCKk=jcXsy_d8C-4Fn-f0zshP6YUPn5N8hsKt7KO7dw@mail.gmail.com> <CAGZ8ZG3KUPAbePp-_GCztj4RSLd8MuNo1iDz=ua+BEjQVzJc7Q@mail.gmail.com> <CA+cU71=A6vFXZrG8mcqj4uC-z2VdJfFOutqcq9MPTYs+uhpa9Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAOuvq22QgGVpsxrsZswqspiP-rgNE6B3vp_6bYDTE5-MrLZdVg@mail.gmail.com> <CA+cU71nN-=TjWZZovMUcTrXMF1gBcYFppnfnsaP7hKw+6AUCLQ@mail.gmail.com>
From: Joseph Bonneau <jbonneau@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 26 Aug 2014 20:15:53 -0400
Message-ID: <CAOe4Uim9ZC7MdY1tXhLWFwNxzxorh00bJ3PBsco_H-KxpYh-Dg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Tom Ritter <tom@ritter.vg>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="bcaec51b161b0484700501915411"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/websec/seoD--rXn-kKvoQr5nbfGcWU0wo
Cc: "draft-ietf-websec-key-pinning@tools.ietf.org" <draft-ietf-websec-key-pinning@tools.ietf.org>, Eric Lawrence <ericlaw1979@hotmail.com>, IETF WebSec WG <websec@ietf.org>, Ryan Sleevi <sleevi@google.com>
Subject: Re: [websec] draft-ietf-websec-key-pinning
X-BeenThere: websec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Web Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <websec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec/>
List-Post: <mailto:websec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 00:16:17 -0000

On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 7:07 PM, Tom Ritter <tom@ritter.vg> wrote:
>
> Just because I have a concern or preference doesn't mean I don't
> really appreciate the work you've done. I do.
>

Well said.


> I'd like PKP-RO to be cached like PKP and applied the same way, absent
> the connection termination (preference). After I realized the
> includeSubdomains issue (concern), I want it even more for testing a
> deployment than I want it for my prior attack detection arguments
> (preference).
>

My email wasn't very clear but I would also prefer this policy; I was
simply trying to say that if this isn't possible or acceptable dropping it
completely might be preferable to the current version.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email