IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [websec] draft-ietf-websec-key-pinning

Tom Ritter <tom@ritter.vg> Wed, 27 August 2014 12:26 UTC

Return-Path: <tom@ritter.vg>
X-Original-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: websec@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 96E1D1A0679 for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 05:26:37 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.379
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.379 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FM_FORGED_GMAIL=0.622, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EEGRAvohi59F for <websec@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 05:26:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ie0-x231.google.com (mail-ie0-x231.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4001:c03::231]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5B8FE1A0678 for <websec@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 05:26:36 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ie0-f177.google.com with SMTP id at20so142288iec.36 for <websec@ietf.org>; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 05:26:35 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=ritter.vg; s=vg; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=bIbdE6MUm19PjdvxJQhsMSYSEQD2QgNIFsPs9mdAShc=; b=xfoEBravh1HelQItUJxIbpgYinGo1qSQHKvAgH5bt1ldWLLcrTjGOw8XxmrnYBoZEQ j2Aj7X+8/H1b0OEdQqUv+RdDr7eXZaVdns7gmdLO57uGpvrQealiMGGbvhiht95K3MmR QXFzJzqBw11/rCGF4XxQ2tGSh+FuLsIDbXtCM=
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=bIbdE6MUm19PjdvxJQhsMSYSEQD2QgNIFsPs9mdAShc=; b=cCbGuGqOo/75dVr7BQRWUEM3NJ27AuR/q1dNZ+MmxnAFFZadJ3a+72tKPhjdJdwEID TcICddJtjEuFGvFQSprpj3tfjG514MtbQQFLj20+BvzGbD2SdYI9Oo0h9RGVA1m/yIkA 6YTPhSrfF2oExmcaKzq5cQumpK/qsHm1ZZXegVCrF6H5uZ5Apy6NbPcrP3x6x5g+OB84 2vpVoPbrCQLbggyAKUH4Dv9Gs0WlHkYdPusGn262sKPZBTK/10u6xtHDvKdn78dfvJDN 4ofow+gBqvhoslxILZZeeWuS61Kr3wIxjstoeRQUdN5qv70VtUadVNSrNdLg3HgNqAVV JBqA==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQntGQHS3KSromyIt25wsbKKhLtBOzgSuzq/khzYoikf/OH0C1VK7KdMYHdaag24g9TyFvCW
X-Received: by 10.42.247.137 with SMTP id mc9mr35266084icb.13.1409142395752; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 05:26:35 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.107.10.104 with HTTP; Wed, 27 Aug 2014 05:26:15 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <0EBE1766-612D-442E-B2B1-149D368144D4@gmail.com>
References: <BAY169-DS62B5941BF0A9024964BB0AEEE0@phx.gbl> <CACvaWvYHAmpX0f9_m-sckhWz9tcyWA-sxVR4vP-A5UcAQmnYXA@mail.gmail.com> <BAY169-DS45F1C5036AB09CA44D0BC7AEDF0@phx.gbl> <CA+cU71k-pLD315dzfd_c74QM51c7V2VQkZ26PiXUTqntmESD=A@mail.gmail.com> <CAOuvq20mZkScvPDKjsa1eZ6rdoHxf_+oF=gpaOcvkOTaYhyj6Q@mail.gmail.com> <CA+cU71mW47OvqRNTbw-H7u-F_k6hMv4xr0XcMYAS_V6eE8brwA@mail.gmail.com> <CAOuvq20C+T9Ejf_KUsfPRtUWL7ggCF0UWJZkGr5xGBEkERXeRQ@mail.gmail.com> <BAY169-DS45D73636AA204DEEABC876AEDC0@phx.gbl> <CAOuvq20kCKk=jcXsy_d8C-4Fn-f0zshP6YUPn5N8hsKt7KO7dw@mail.gmail.com> <CAGZ8ZG3KUPAbePp-_GCztj4RSLd8MuNo1iDz=ua+BEjQVzJc7Q@mail.gmail.com> <CA+cU71=A6vFXZrG8mcqj4uC-z2VdJfFOutqcq9MPTYs+uhpa9Q@mail.gmail.com> <CAOuvq22QgGVpsxrsZswqspiP-rgNE6B3vp_6bYDTE5-MrLZdVg@mail.gmail.com> <CA+cU71nN-=TjWZZovMUcTrXMF1gBcYFppnfnsaP7hKw+6AUCLQ@mail.gmail.com> <CAOe4Uim9ZC7MdY1tXhLWFwNxzxorh00bJ3PBsco_H-KxpYh-Dg@mail.gmail.com> <CAGZ8ZG3xoA1w1oEx9F8MuH1PARe5ALU9A1CEXqDXM-JSh_niGg@mail.gmail.com> <CACvaWvYjVXMsgCzL=mM+F8eS0hcjTqEaR7xYzti4LD4rdpbD1g@mail.gmail.com> <0EBE1766-612D-442E-B2B1-149D368144D4@gmail.com>
From: Tom Ritter <tom@ritter.vg>
Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 07:26:15 -0500
Message-ID: <CA+cU71=gTW1ePN9HX4urTDktF-RohgrmYP_jRgKVStQ4F7QP6w@mail.gmail.com>
To: Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/websec/uO0MPPOFiEyPXMFYsBqFaQnz6lg
Cc: draft-ietf-websec-key-pinning <draft-ietf-websec-key-pinning@tools.ietf.org>, Eric Lawrence <ericlaw1979@hotmail.com>, "<websec@ietf.org>" <websec@ietf.org>, Ryan Sleevi <sleevi@google.com>
Subject: Re: [websec] draft-ietf-websec-key-pinning
X-BeenThere: websec@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Web Application Security Minus Authentication and Transport <websec.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/websec/>
List-Post: <mailto:websec@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/websec>, <mailto:websec-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 27 Aug 2014 12:26:37 -0000

On 27 August 2014 05:46, Yoav Nir <ynir.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:
> At this stage, we can make editorial changes, but we cannot make significant
> changes on our own. We can withdraw the request to publish, and take it back
> to the working group, but I think that would be inadvisable.
>
> I think we should proceed, making only editorial changes, and changes
> resulting from discussion with IESG members.

If adding a note in 4.2 about includeSubdomains and PKP-RO (for
testing) counts as editorial, I think that is worthwhile.
Otherwise/regardless I also don't want to withdraw.

-tom

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email