Re: Request for well-known URI: est

Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com> Mon, 10 June 2013 14:34 UTC

Return-Path: <turners@ieca.com>
X-Original-To: wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C87B021F8FB6 for <wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 07:34:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.196
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.196 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.069, BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DvqPa351Jn8M for <wellknown-uri-review@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 07:34:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gateway06.websitewelcome.com (gateway06.websitewelcome.com [67.18.52.14]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6C1821F8F61 for <wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 07:34:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gateway06.websitewelcome.com (Postfix, from userid 5007) id 59CEE809E8E75; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 09:34:51 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from gator1743.hostgator.com (gator1743.hostgator.com [184.173.253.227]) by gateway06.websitewelcome.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4B4BB809E8E51 for <wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 09:34:51 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from [173.73.135.101] (port=63132 helo=thunderfish.local) by gator1743.hostgator.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from <turners@ieca.com>) id 1Um3BL-00013n-2m; Mon, 10 Jun 2013 09:34:51 -0500
Message-ID: <51B5E40A.4090808@ieca.com>
Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 10:34:50 -0400
From: Sean Turner <turners@ieca.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; rv:17.0) Gecko/20130509 Thunderbird/17.0.6
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org
Subject: Re: Request for well-known URI: est
References: <516D6CC8.6070705@ieca.com>
In-Reply-To: <516D6CC8.6070705@ieca.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - gator1743.hostgator.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ieca.com
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: (thunderfish.local) [173.73.135.101]:63132
X-Source-Auth: sean.turner@ieca.com
X-Email-Count: 13
X-Source-Cap: ZG9tbWdyNDg7ZG9tbWdyNDg7Z2F0b3IxNzQzLmhvc3RnYXRvci5jb20=
Cc: draft-ietf-pkix-est.all@tools.ietf.org, app-ads@tools.ietf.org
X-BeenThere: wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Well-Known URI review list <wellknown-uri-review.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wellknown-uri-review>, <mailto:wellknown-uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/wellknown-uri-review>
List-Post: <mailto:wellknown-uri-review@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wellknown-uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wellknown-uri-review>, <mailto:wellknown-uri-review-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 Jun 2013 14:34:57 -0000

Hi experts,

We've made some tweaks to the draft and are hoping that you could 
re-review this for sanity:

https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pkix-est/

spt

On 4/16/13 11:22 AM, Sean Turner wrote:
> Hi wellknown-uri experts!
>
> I'd like to request a review of registration request for
> .well-known/est, which is found in
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pkix-est/.
>
> Summary: EST (Enrollment over Secure Transport) is a way for clients to
> retrieve PKI-related "stuff" from an EST server.  Think posting
> enrollment requests (i.e., PKCS#10), getting enrollment responses (i.e.,
> PKCS#7 certs-only), re-enrollment, CA certificates, etc.
>
>
> A related question, which I'm hoping you might be able to help with:
> when specifying the URI bit below our soon-to-be wellknown URI do we
> need to specify whether they are case sensitive or not?  For example, we
> have:
>
> /.well-known/est/CACerts
>
> but would that only be the same as the following if we state that it's
> case insensitive:
>
> /.well-known/est/cacerts
>
> spt
>