Re: IETF meat grinder

Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca> Tue, 04 October 2022 22:07 UTC

Return-Path: <mcr@sandelman.ca>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E6809C14F73B for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 15:07:48 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.907
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.907 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id fsY2xfT95KaY for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 15:07:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from relay.sandelman.ca (relay.cooperix.net [IPv6:2a01:7e00:e000:2bb::1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1FCD1C14CE2B for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 15:07:44 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dooku.sandelman.ca (unknown [5.148.108.163]) by relay.sandelman.ca (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 954A61F459; Tue, 4 Oct 2022 22:07:41 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by dooku.sandelman.ca (Postfix, from userid 179) id ED10F1A0748; Wed, 5 Oct 2022 00:07:40 +0200 (CEST)
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ca>
To: Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx>
cc: "Salz, Rich" <rsalz=40akamai.com@dmarc.ietf.org>, "wgchairs@ietf.org" <wgchairs@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: IETF meat grinder
In-reply-to: <CAL02cgR-XcXfAOiftVO+KJDLb7L+K+w-Y5-OhCEDqA_yqeC5pw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <967194.1664711915@dooku> <24b49f319c79415bb792729b3b5b9dfe@akamai.com> <1185265.1664717360@dooku> <CAL02cgRxM4=_3SmzFJY8NCKBJZAL+torgKTGequB_17=SxDA3g@mail.gmail.com> <61360.1664883038@dooku> <CAL02cgR-XcXfAOiftVO+KJDLb7L+K+w-Y5-OhCEDqA_yqeC5pw@mail.gmail.com>
Comments: In-reply-to Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> message dated "Tue, 04 Oct 2022 09:42:02 -0400."
X-Mailer: MH-E 8.6+git; nmh 1.7.1; GNU Emacs 27.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-ID: <28803.1664921260.1@dooku>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2022 23:07:40 +0100
Message-ID: <28804.1664921260@dooku>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/NkUCA3sdRc_nVx3h8slEXK1DD3g>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 04 Oct 2022 22:07:49 -0000

Richard Barnes <rlb@ipv.sx> wrote:
    > TBH, I don't think the official IETF process docs say all that much
    > prescriptively about how WGs have to work, so I think you have a pretty
    > free hand there, as long as you can ultimately demonstrate consensus,
    > and that there was openness and transparency in the process.  The final
    > approval steps are the main thing.  For that, the MLS chairs have a
    > handy map + "You are here" marker, see, e.g.:

    > https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/114/materials/slides-114-mls-chairs-slides-00.pdf

That's the slide I want.
You are here.