IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: Holding an action

Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com> Fri, 14 May 2021 16:36 UTC

Return-Path: <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EFE643A387C for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 May 2021 09:36:06 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id GGzStlpyl-Ut for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 14 May 2021 09:36:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x32d.google.com (mail-wm1-x32d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32d]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 32BA73A387D for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 May 2021 09:36:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x32d.google.com with SMTP id o127so69099wmo.4 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Fri, 14 May 2021 09:36:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:date:from:subject:thread-topic:in-reply-to:message-id :references:to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=O+ZgUfcwbaTb6Du8d7EWHvqpSOvVaUkhZKqd1Cqj0eI=; b=UXLtPWm/SXehhGVFBUgUnsKSiVwJUAsiADGEsgjycqW5ITXGo4A2Z1HESa2zbBy+B8 VIQNyarRfKD064oYGHxElDsGis/yKSdjYK3oHLc+aw5niO736WtFvzVtxeVY+W3MyNVj S/qauNbXBuyqxfjRIs7VFAbZPhj4cg/EGaocC2qVFjmoX2FcTDOC8Eme+Agygp9VueKn PQiMGUKEJ09TPs01B1OUGYobfNlaamynzPCOlxqCfr+PLHqbVcOF4oYywBmgdtmq5VBP 9BSG1Nu1rwpCEopjtZRj+pdVuw8NkbHDH6huNMAEPGWXV/2Ag1jvlx+YqhVnVg9xiuGU CF6A==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:date:from:subject:thread-topic :in-reply-to:message-id:references:to:content-transfer-encoding; bh=O+ZgUfcwbaTb6Du8d7EWHvqpSOvVaUkhZKqd1Cqj0eI=; b=Bn4ShRufOwXIIsOfC0knzTj8/lXih7mY3FumbY0W2xRQl7uUCYYJ0taUVHnANpyl4C Gq0juve3jSe02yRf29G6oh7SKTxJToqbhZ/XkvbVqrDVXdE0bhVOQRHRq7tMTknswFG6 yEPkjSYNTIIZSWoqOXmW9+7rwg3ZsEOX0NSaBuWuz+g7MXHRXg5cJ9bPUYqOK3gRSTit 5dIeVsrT+7Q4frxhPIBcJO/oT0PcToa7ueEn5sGXa683ZXwnc7AvmS+jRV2tmwGT+Re3 CaiKmsyfDy6doBTH28m+XtXUgBnj1WCbjpV4x8NmFMejXJeZkqMey80a6DlSkrmEeD/G V1AQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533iusnyQ/dKaMYm1lo+yfX4N/NafpY8me1cCvz9qs7WwZMo/xKW SA6rEFIflJ9QJ9JwuaHzHFE=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJyS3Vmw9+7RwlNHBc6yeu0DFY1R/hcXzFir7yOVBPPRrS+T0xk+teP19GM+/VpFAbL2Six82g==
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:66c6:: with SMTP id a189mr10244778wmc.60.1621010155604; Fri, 14 May 2021 09:35:55 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from INTUL183d7d6fa (pub-corp-42-8.intuit.com. [91.102.42.8]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 15sm5651150wmj.28.2021.05.14.09.35.54 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-ECDSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Fri, 14 May 2021 09:35:55 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 19:35:51 +0300
From: Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Holding an action
Thread-Topic: Re: Holding an action
In-Reply-To: <cc476ef9-89de-b1fb-74dc-f4e438cdd9e9@nostrum.com>
Message-ID: <A9610943-0E07-1B4F-A107-26C22E70566C@hxcore.ol>
References: <5FDD7FD3-FC0F-DD41-9F1A-48930BBBF22D@hxcore.ol> <6.2.5.6.2.20210514020559.0eeeefa0@elandnews.com> <2E02B592-557A-9F48-BB26-8836ED0A08CD@hxcore.ol> <CALaySJK0+JEG35cSqJjYq0V97pVym2kag-sLjtnfn5WNty+POw@mail.gmail.com>, <cc476ef9-89de-b1fb-74dc-f4e438cdd9e9@nostrum.com>
To: Robert Sparks <rjsparks@nostrum.com>, "wgchairs@ietf.org" <wgchairs@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/W6wbBhUgLAuStcqgrL9vVzL_uYY>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 16:36:18 -0000

Thank you Robert! I agree this should have happened when we submitted the new rev.

 

                Yaron

 

On 5/14/21, 19:02, "Robert Sparks" <rjsparks@nostrum.com> wrote:

I think there is a bug in the new code that should remove the authors as

action holders when a new revision is submitted.

 

 

The relevant code starts here:

 

 

RjS

 

On 5/14/21 8:07 AM, Barry Leiba wrote:

> We discussed that quite a bit while I was on the IESG recently, and

> also discussed it with the tools team.  In the end, we decided that it

> can't, in general, be done automatically, and the best approach is

> that if one needs to remember what the action is, one should

> (manually) put a comment in the datatracker as a reminder (which I

> often did as AD, and which I will do as WGC when I need to).

> 

> Barry

> 

> On Fri, May 14, 2021 at 5:19 AM Yaron Sheffer <yaronf.ietf@gmail.com> wrote:

>> Yes, and I know that. My point is: there is no use telling people that they have an action without telling them what it is.

>> 

>> 

>> 

>> On 5/14/21, 12:12, "S Moonesamy" <sm+ietf@elandsys.com> wrote:

>> 

>> Hi Yaron,

>> 

>> At 02:01 AM 14-05-2021, Yaron Sheffer wrote:

>> 

>>> As a co-author, I am marked as an "action

>>> holder" with a bright red "for 35 days" on my draft [1].

>> 

>> 

>> There is a "discuss" from one of the Security

>> 

>> Area Directors.  The usual practice in such cases

>> 

>> is to discuss the "discuss" with the Area Director.

>> 

>> 

>> 

>> Regards,

>> 

>> S. Moonesamy

>> 

>> 

>> 

>> 

 

 

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email