IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: A quick poll about RFC 7221

Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com> Thu, 17 September 2020 23:36 UTC

Return-Path: <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 241EE3A0EF8 for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 16:36:16 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.097
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.097 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id kO_3NgbbyCh1 for <wgchairs@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 16:36:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-yb1-xb36.google.com (mail-yb1-xb36.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::b36]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC2723A0EE3 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 16:36:14 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-yb1-xb36.google.com with SMTP id x10so2901524ybj.13 for <wgchairs@ietf.org>; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 16:36:14 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=W8YG22ZkmylZ/y/NMuKuCK6XAqlZs2guIQE28oTd9FE=; b=AHKO5wsc51ONDk2I2vgATPFnz6xNg7sTw92lBVwXNQXYAlTQq5/cZXY8VxakZmzSGW 9JeSuPWqRahE4GpULSm6w70leTNgIB/P523gU9u5toXC4fx6Sq6T2d1uxGhkqfqKINK6 RzmA7EQYJDq4hU6XRj4Cj7hKwu4X5rYAcY6ttmvOrYH7KVOZwZoj6oqIxdcsYYWaKvbR ozYVqlsSFKZe9SDe5MEYSGSkGB0EvzaNB4VZ2WXESMt9Ey/jzsNFjePMjiQqOketiYgu 5bH9DLNHyiSaT1BcRFz7iJNpiZJujURfiod63NQr28PiRFBXtX0T/Tu9l4jzXC5eitVT +Xlg==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=W8YG22ZkmylZ/y/NMuKuCK6XAqlZs2guIQE28oTd9FE=; b=gmU3bgi2MptEYx0UuZpa6uEn4drRljZuTocCj8Z4DhIeV+IyVx1uAcxp6NvuL7Mqv/ xV9NboHjsnfcrQDwXyPqs987APGhW3AlTpkxYN3jNdhmH5zDhGc/WnqJIIeENi1kGayX DB4YjsI1/Dl0U30U3mRCiJAciOI4WPypw9/wUKOOCT6FQRwjwxd60NRRwwIojd5/eQH/ Poo3jIkpuS4q0pR7hy5xAnlxTQ1fnQQPt6JLWk26H41DaxzDv8gb7/Q03Ee24DKJXglC eeM1aybuYkwBij13gvw9/iU1ROffQLfoODmRI8zbwTb8ttX98hviJzKmfuByWUxzrzMA cAvw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM53011e0RhM3Nl/eTb4AFUxmtuA5pU/UmoF6GagOW9cYc5oMs3PAj ep7Yg0zxsbjOd+rs64o6vBkjv3Nkl+pZHYAAZQY=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJzn/M646IOtmDIHGyyhbhEOqcLsid9N/beB9v8aglus9Bw4j6pUWd0g3wU8zoT3YJ6bbDEGT4uctQq3GBTMh1Q=
X-Received: by 2002:a25:7481:: with SMTP id p123mr4636489ybc.380.1600385774120; Thu, 17 Sep 2020 16:36:14 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <00e001d68940$bc73db70$355b9250$@olddog.co.uk> <7EFF456C-7DAA-4B1B-966F-DFADEC1EC0ED@tzi.org> <92710ea0-ae26-c59b-79a5-d7e5b1d89b18@joelhalpern.com> <CAAedzxrCF6KBVbjbb18FLnLKx__YOF5_gtHYnuu_MA5XvUygEA@mail.gmail.com> <CADaq8jeqjdJkVxEQ0qQSgvRBjYwmWAJz7qYq9cfWTh8AUXE1rg@mail.gmail.com> <c1c39cce-d6fa-f6b3-dfec-ff01c83a358f@joelhalpern.com>
In-Reply-To: <c1c39cce-d6fa-f6b3-dfec-ff01c83a358f@joelhalpern.com>
From: Spencer Dawkins at IETF <spencerdawkins.ietf@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 18:35:48 -0500
Message-ID: <CAKKJt-d+YmUb0A-Cn5EzJq_KxM5UibB8Vf+xWrVhqU-9-3F6xQ@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: A quick poll about RFC 7221
To: "Joel M. Halpern" <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
Cc: David Noveck <davenoveck@gmail.com>, WG Chairs <wgchairs@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="00000000000091f36205af8ad9de"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wgchairs/gz32zwCeim6ZCThL-6kJwMn9Frg>
X-BeenThere: wgchairs@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Working Group Chairs <wgchairs.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/wgchairs/>
List-Post: <mailto:wgchairs@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wgchairs>, <mailto:wgchairs-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Sep 2020 23:36:16 -0000

Just to confirm,

On Sun, Sep 13, 2020 at 10:45 AM Joel M. Halpern <jmh@joelhalpern.com>
wrote:

> Without trying to revisit ancient history, what you describe is not the
> case.
>
> The IESG never owns the document.  One can argue that the IETF owns it
> during and after IETF last call.  If events transpired as you say, I
> would have said that the chairs were obliged to notify the WG of the
> changes.  If they were indeed of that magnitude, a new WG LC could well
> have been appropriate.  In some cases, I have seen a new IETF LC as well
> when the changes were sufficiently large.
>

I've done both AUTH48 WGLCs (as a WG chair) and AUTH48 LCs (as an AD) for
non-editorial changes when that seemed like the Right Thing To Do, so my
experience matches Joel's understanding.

Best,

Spencer

>
> Yours,
> Joel
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email