IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [wpkops] Preliminary Next Version of Browser Behavior Draft

Tim Moses <tim.moses@entrust.com> Fri, 06 June 2014 20:01 UTC

Return-Path: <tim.moses@entrust.com>
X-Original-To: wpkops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wpkops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57E331A0086 for <wpkops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Jun 2014 13:01:58 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.552
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.552 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.651, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id yD2y_5j6Lyis for <wpkops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 6 Jun 2014 13:01:57 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ipedge2.entrust.com (ipedge2.entrust.com [216.191.252.25]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AFB801A0078 for <wpkops@ietf.org>; Fri, 6 Jun 2014 13:01:56 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.98,991,1392181200"; d="scan'208";a="1203767"
Received: from unknown (HELO sottexchcas.corp.ad.entrust.com) ([10.4.51.93]) by ipedge2.entrust.com with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 06 Jun 2014 16:01:49 -0400
Received: from SOTTEXCH11.corp.ad.entrust.com ([fe80::303b:8584:c6f4:be18]) by sottexchcas1.corp.ad.entrust.com ([::1]) with mapi id 14.03.0174.001; Fri, 6 Jun 2014 16:01:49 -0400
From: Tim Moses <tim.moses@entrust.com>
To: Ben Wilson <ben@digicert.com>
Thread-Topic: [wpkops] Preliminary Next Version of Browser Behavior Draft
Thread-Index: Ac9uwg5tUjGh+edRQh2AER9r67oKVQLT+HEAAY+VWIAAHLZlEAAJkowAADv7f4D//9Gd+A==
Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2014 20:01:47 +0000
Message-ID: <4CC654C4-4A26-4284-A231-6C0D60B81A1E@entrust.com>
References: <001901cf6ec2$376461b0$a62d2510$@digicert.com> <059501cf79f0$69ba9060$3d2fb120$@digicert.com> <538F795F.3020008@mozilla.org> <5B68A271B9C97046963CB6A5B8D6F62CE819DE1D@SOTTEXCH11.corp.ad.entrust.com> <53907A4C.7070307@mozilla.org>, <003701cf81b7$d0cb5ae0$726210a0$@digicert.com>
In-Reply-To: <003701cf81b7$d0cb5ae0$726210a0$@digicert.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wpkops/426BT469kbPvCujJbrKDQoxnSNc
Cc: Gervase Markham <gerv@mozilla.org>, "i-barreira@izenpe.net" <i-barreira@izenpe.net>, Bruce Morton <bruce.morton@entrust.com>, "wpkops@ietf.org" <wpkops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [wpkops] Preliminary Next Version of Browser Behavior Draft
X-BeenThere: wpkops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <wpkops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wpkops>, <mailto:wpkops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/wpkops/>
List-Post: <mailto:wpkops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wpkops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wpkops>, <mailto:wpkops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2014 20:01:58 -0000

Bruce/Inigo - Do you think the Transparency section in the revocation doc from Phill and David belongs in the Trust Model doc?  

All the best. Tim. 

> On Jun 6, 2014, at 2:47 PM, "Ben Wilson" <ben@digicert.com> wrote:
> 
> Iñigo and Bruce,
> Perhaps we should revise the Trust Model document to describe how browser,
> root store, and cryptolibrary are related?  In addressing Gerv's comments, I
> am thinking of starting with the following "This document reviews the
> current processing behaviors of cryptolibraries, and the browsers they
> support, with respect to SSL/TLS session establishment between a server and
> a browser, ..." or something along those lines.
> Thoughts?
> Thanks,
> Ben
> 
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: wpkops [mailto:wpkops-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Gervase Markham
>> Sent: Thursday, June 5, 2014 8:10 AM
>> To: Tim Moses; ben@digicert.com
>> Cc: wpkops@ietf.org
>> Subject: Re: [wpkops] Preliminary Next Version of Browser Behavior Draft
>> 
>>> On 05/06/14 14:37, Tim Moses wrote:
>>> Hi Ben.  We want to move this document to WG draft status.  Do you 
>>> want to address Gerv's comments before we hold a ballot?  I suggest we 
>>> do that.
>> 
>> Again, apologies for lack of knowledge of the process, but: the doc is full
> of "to be expanded",
>> "we plan to..." etc. So there will be lots of further change. Is that what
> "Draft" means?
>> 
>> My two examples were two of many; they were actually given to try and get
> clarity on the 
>> purpose and goals of the document. If that's written up somewhere, do point
> me to it. :-)
>> 
>> Gerv
>> 
>>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email