IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [wpkops] Preliminary Next Version of Browser Behavior Draft

Gervase Markham <gerv@mozilla.org> Thu, 05 June 2014 14:10 UTC

Return-Path: <gerv@mozilla.org>
X-Original-To: wpkops@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: wpkops@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57CDD1A01A5 for <wpkops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Jun 2014 07:10:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.278
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.278 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HELO_MISMATCH_ORG=0.611, HOST_MISMATCH_COM=0.311, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id CkTK2XiFB3DV for <wpkops@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 5 Jun 2014 07:10:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from smtp.mozilla.org (mx1.corp.phx1.mozilla.com [63.245.216.69]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D2D91A01A7 for <wpkops@ietf.org>; Thu, 5 Jun 2014 07:10:30 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.119] (host86-131-197-101.range86-131.btcentralplus.com [86.131.197.101]) (Authenticated sender: gerv@mozilla.org) by mx1.mail.corp.phx1.mozilla.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C0BD7F234B; Thu, 5 Jun 2014 07:10:22 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <53907A4C.7070307@mozilla.org>
Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2014 15:10:20 +0100
From: Gervase Markham <gerv@mozilla.org>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux i686; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.0a2
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: Tim Moses <tim.moses@entrust.com>, "ben@digicert.com" <ben@digicert.com>
References: <001901cf6ec2$376461b0$a62d2510$@digicert.com> <059501cf79f0$69ba9060$3d2fb120$@digicert.com> <538F795F.3020008@mozilla.org> <5B68A271B9C97046963CB6A5B8D6F62CE819DE1D@SOTTEXCH11.corp.ad.entrust.com>
In-Reply-To: <5B68A271B9C97046963CB6A5B8D6F62CE819DE1D@SOTTEXCH11.corp.ad.entrust.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.7a1pre
OpenPGP: id=9DF43DBB
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/wpkops/FLsrS7DRNvLOUChHC8g0RkR_WwY
Cc: "wpkops@ietf.org" <wpkops@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [wpkops] Preliminary Next Version of Browser Behavior Draft
X-BeenThere: wpkops@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: <wpkops.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/wpkops>, <mailto:wpkops-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/wpkops/>
List-Post: <mailto:wpkops@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:wpkops-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/wpkops>, <mailto:wpkops-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 05 Jun 2014 14:10:32 -0000

On 05/06/14 14:37, Tim Moses wrote:
> Hi Ben.  We want to move this document to WG draft status.  Do you
> want to address Gerv's comments before we hold a ballot?  I suggest
> we do that.

Again, apologies for lack of knowledge of the process, but: the doc is
full of "to be expanded", "we plan to..." etc. So there will be lots of
further change. Is that what "Draft" means?

My two examples were two of many; they were actually given to try and
get clarity on the purpose and goals of the document. If that's written
up somewhere, do point me to it. :-)

Gerv

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email