RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants
"Drage, Keith (Keith)" <drage@lucent.com> Wed, 04 February 2004 09:52 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA28095 for <xcon-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 04:52:31 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AoJhT-0007bU-My for xcon-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2004 04:52:03 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i149q3qS029226 for xcon-archive@odin.ietf.org; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 04:52:03 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AoJhS-0007bJ-Mg for xcon-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2004 04:52:02 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA28089 for <xcon-web-archive@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 04:51:59 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AoJhP-0005IA-00 for xcon-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2004 04:51:59 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AoJgR-0005DP-00 for xcon-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2004 04:50:59 -0500
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AoJfV-00058l-00 for xcon-web-archive@ietf.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2004 04:50:01 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AoJfU-0007VC-K0; Wed, 04 Feb 2004 04:50:00 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AoJea-0007Tl-AU for xcon@optimus.ietf.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2004 04:49:04 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id EAA28044 for <xcon@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 04:49:01 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AoJeX-00053E-00 for xcon@ietf.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2004 04:49:01 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AoJdY-0004xt-00 for xcon@ietf.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2004 04:48:01 -0500
Received: from auemail1.lucent.com ([192.11.223.161] helo=auemail1.firewall.lucent.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AoJd8-0004tO-00 for xcon@ietf.org; Wed, 04 Feb 2004 04:47:34 -0500
Received: from uk0006exch001h.wins.lucent.com (h135-86-145-57.lucent.com [135.86.145.57]) by auemail1.firewall.lucent.com (Switch-2.2.8/Switch-2.2.8) with ESMTP id i149kx719548 for <xcon@ietf.org>; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 03:47:00 -0600 (CST)
Received: by uk0006exch001h.uk.lucent.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72) id <D0BVRP17>; Wed, 4 Feb 2004 09:46:58 -0000
Message-ID: <475FF955A05DD411980D00508B6D5FB00B1B13B0@en0033exch001u.uk.lucent.com>
From: "Drage, Keith (Keith)" <drage@lucent.com>
To: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>, Eric Burger <eburger@snowshore.com>, XCON-IETF <xcon@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants
Date: Wed, 04 Feb 2004 09:46:53 -0000
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2657.72)
Content-Type: text/plain
Sender: xcon-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: xcon-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: xcon@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xcon>, <mailto:xcon-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Centralized Conferencing <xcon.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:xcon@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xcon-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xcon>, <mailto:xcon-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60
In the current mechanisms I know of for supporting legal intercept (in 3GPP), the interceptor would not even be a participant, therefore I am not convinced that this is relevant to the issue of hidden participants anyway. regards Keith > -----Original Message----- > From: Cullen Jennings [mailto:fluffy@cisco.com] > Sent: 03 February 2004 17:08 > To: Eric Burger; XCON-IETF > Subject: Re: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants > > > > I don't care if we support hidden participants but I feel that the > requirements for Legal Intercept should definitely be out. > There are way too > many land minds over yonder and it is not the point of this > WG to solve > those. > > Cullen > > > > On 1/20/04 8:00 AM, "Eric Burger" <eburger@snowshore.com> wrote: > > > Would Legal Intercept be in or out? E.g., hidden > participants that CANNOT be > > known. > > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Drage, Keith (Keith) [mailto:drage@lucent.com] > >> Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 6:14 AM > >> To: hisham.khartabil@nokia.com; mhammer@cisco.com > >> Cc: xcon@ietf.org > >> Subject: RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants > >> > >> > >> I believe hidden users are appropriate. > >> > >> I do not believe that this adds complexity to the > >> specifications (particularly to the specification of CPCP), > >> so I see no need to make it a DEFER as far as the > >> specifications are concerned. It may add complexity to the > >> implementation, so I am quite happy to see it a MAY in the > >> requirements, so that it is optional to implement. > >> > >> As regards the legal implications of hidden users, then yes, > >> there may be priveleged users that are able to request the > >> identity of hidden users (along with an indication that they > >> are hidden). This of course requires the enabling of such a > >> privileged user in the first place. > >> > >> Secondly, it may not be necessary to identify hidden users, > >> but merely that there are hidden users in the conference (in > >> addition to any that may have made themselves visible). Some > >> countries require some form of tone or announcement on voice > >> conferences when someone else is listening in. They also > >> require an announcement or other indication in the call is > >> being recorded. > >> > >> regards > >> > >> Keith > >> > >> Keith Drage > >> Lucent Technologies > >> drage@lucent.com > >> tel: +44 1793 776249 > >> > >> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: hisham.khartabil@nokia.com > [mailto:hisham.khartabil@nokia.com] > >>> Sent: 15 December 2003 16:29 > >>> To: mhammer@cisco.com > >>> Cc: xcon@ietf.org > >>> Subject: RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>> -----Original Message----- > >>>> From: ext Michael Hammer [mailto:mhammer@cisco.com] > >>>> Sent: 15.December.2003 18:17 > >>>> To: Khartabil Hisham (NMP-MSW/Helsinki) > >>>> Cc: xcon@ietf.org > >>>> Subject: Re: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> Related to this is there a requirement that, while not > >>> revealing the > >>>> identity of a hidden user, the conference policy contains > >>>> state indication > >>>> about either the presence of hidden users, or the > >>>> possibility/preclusion > >>>> that such hidden users may be present? > >>>> > >>>> I am anticipating that: > >>>> 1) Laws may exist that require notification of such. > >>> > >>> That's a good point. This might require changes to the > >>> conference event package to indicate if there are hidden > >>> participants or not, and if so, how many. > >>> > >>> The question remain: is there a need for such a feature (to > >>> hide users?)? > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> Hisham > >>> > >>>> 2) In some conferences, participants may want technical > >>>> assurance that > >>>> hidden users are not possible before they speak. > >>>> > >>>> Mike > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> At 02:55 PM 12/15/2003 +0200, hisham.khartabil@nokia.com wrote: > >>>>> This is in reference to requirements REQ-A7 and REQ-E10 in > >>>> > >>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-xcon-cpcp-reqs-00.txt >>>> >>>> REQ-A7: It SHOULD be possible to participate in a >> conference as a >>>> hidden user. Hidden user is present in a conference, but >>> his presence >>>> is not revealed. >>>> >>>> REQ-E10: It MUST be possible to allow and disallow >>> hidden membership >>>> in a conference. >>>> >>>> Should a conference policy, using CPCP, specify if a user >>> can be hidden? >>>> This means that the conference state package does not report the >>>> participation on the hidden user. CPCP is used to identify >>> which users are >>>> hidden. The list of hidden users is only manipulated by a >>> privileged user >>>> such as the moderator. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Hisham >>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> XCON mailing list >>>> XCON@ietf.org >>>> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xcon >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> XCON mailing list >> XCON@ietf.org >> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xcon >> >> _______________________________________________ >> XCON mailing list >> XCON@ietf.org >> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xcon >> >> > > > _______________________________________________ > XCON mailing list > XCON@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xcon > _______________________________________________ XCON mailing list XCON@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xcon _______________________________________________ XCON mailing list XCON@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xcon
- [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants hisham.khartabil
- RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants Rosen, Brian
- RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants hisham.khartabil
- Re: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants Michael Hammer
- RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants Michael Hammer
- RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants hisham.khartabil
- RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants hisham.khartabil
- RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants Michael Hammer
- RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants hisham.khartabil
- RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants Drage, Keith (Keith)
- RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants Drage, Keith (Keith)
- RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants Eric Burger
- RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants hisham.khartabil
- Re: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants Cullen Jennings
- RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants Chris Boulton
- RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants Drage, Keith (Keith)
- RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants hisham.khartabil
- RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants Eric Burger
- Re: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants Rohan Mahy
- RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants hisham.khartabil
- RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants Adam Roach
- Re: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants Rohan Mahy
- RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants Adam Roach
- Re: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants Rohan Mahy
- RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants Drage, Keith (Keith)