RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants
"Chris Boulton" <cboulton@ubiquity.net> Tue, 03 February 2004 17:39 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (optimus.ietf.org [132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA20466 for <xcon-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Feb 2004 12:39:01 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Ao4VM-0003Qo-W4 for xcon-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2004 12:38:33 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i13HcWvX013183 for xcon-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 3 Feb 2004 12:38:32 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Ao4VM-0003QY-Pg for xcon-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2004 12:38:32 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA20451 for <xcon-web-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Feb 2004 12:38:29 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Ao4VL-0004u1-00 for xcon-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2004 12:38:31 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Ao4UV-0004on-00 for xcon-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2004 12:37:40 -0500
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Ao4Tu-0004jo-00 for xcon-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2004 12:37:02 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Ao4Tt-00033y-M5; Tue, 03 Feb 2004 12:37:01 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1Ao4TQ-00032r-Gn for xcon@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2004 12:36:32 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id MAA20387 for <xcon@ietf.org>; Tue, 3 Feb 2004 12:36:29 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Ao4TO-0004iP-00 for xcon@ietf.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2004 12:36:30 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1Ao4SV-0004dR-00 for xcon@ietf.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2004 12:35:36 -0500
Received: from cluster-a.mailcontrol.com ([80.69.8.190] helo=rly04a.srv.mailcontrol.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1Ao4S2-0004X6-00 for xcon@ietf.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2004 12:35:07 -0500
Received: from gbnewp0186s1.eu.ubiquity.net (news.ubiquity.net [194.202.146.92]) by rly04a.srv.mailcontrol.com (MailControl) with SMTP id i13HYT59030611; Tue, 3 Feb 2004 17:34:30 GMT
Received: from mailhost.eu.ubiquity.net by gbnewp0186s1.eu.ubiquity.net via smtpd (for cluster-a.mailcontrol.com [80.69.8.190]) with SMTP; Tue, 3 Feb 2004 17:34:28 +0000
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 17:34:29 -0000
Message-ID: <45730E094814E44488F789C1CDED27AE02BDF15D@gbnewp0758m.eu.ubiquity.net>
Thread-Topic: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants
Thread-Index: AcPqeMCxzpW4voPCR5iPmazUqtLS7wAAww1Q
From: Chris Boulton <cboulton@ubiquity.net>
To: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>, Eric Burger <eburger@snowshore.com>, XCON-IETF <xcon@ietf.org>
X-Scanned-By: MailControl A-02-00-00 (www.mailcontrol.com)
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: xcon-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: xcon-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: xcon@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xcon>, <mailto:xcon-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Centralized Conferencing <xcon.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:xcon@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xcon-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xcon>, <mailto:xcon-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=AWL autolearn=no version=2.60
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I agree with Cullen. I don't have a problem with Hidden participants BUT 'is legal intercept really in the scope of CPCP?'? Chris. >-----Original Message----- >From: Cullen Jennings [mailto:fluffy@cisco.com] >Sent: 03 February 2004 17:08 >To: Eric Burger; XCON-IETF >Subject: Re: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants > > >I don't care if we support hidden participants but I feel that the >requirements for Legal Intercept should definitely be out. There are way >too >many land minds over yonder and it is not the point of this WG to solve >those. > >Cullen > > > >On 1/20/04 8:00 AM, "Eric Burger" <eburger@snowshore.com> wrote: > >> Would Legal Intercept be in or out? E.g., hidden participants that >CANNOT be >> known. >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: Drage, Keith (Keith) [mailto:drage@lucent.com] >>> Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 6:14 AM >>> To: hisham.khartabil@nokia.com; mhammer@cisco.com >>> Cc: xcon@ietf.org >>> Subject: RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants >>> >>> >>> I believe hidden users are appropriate. >>> >>> I do not believe that this adds complexity to the >>> specifications (particularly to the specification of CPCP), >>> so I see no need to make it a DEFER as far as the >>> specifications are concerned. It may add complexity to the >>> implementation, so I am quite happy to see it a MAY in the >>> requirements, so that it is optional to implement. >>> >>> As regards the legal implications of hidden users, then yes, >>> there may be priveleged users that are able to request the >>> identity of hidden users (along with an indication that they >>> are hidden). This of course requires the enabling of such a >>> privileged user in the first place. >>> >>> Secondly, it may not be necessary to identify hidden users, >>> but merely that there are hidden users in the conference (in >>> addition to any that may have made themselves visible). Some >>> countries require some form of tone or announcement on voice >>> conferences when someone else is listening in. They also >>> require an announcement or other indication in the call is >>> being recorded. >>> >>> regards >>> >>> Keith >>> >>> Keith Drage >>> Lucent Technologies >>> drage@lucent.com >>> tel: +44 1793 776249 >>> >>> >>>> -----Original Message----- >>>> From: hisham.khartabil@nokia.com [mailto:hisham.khartabil@nokia.com] >>>> Sent: 15 December 2003 16:29 >>>> To: mhammer@cisco.com >>>> Cc: xcon@ietf.org >>>> Subject: RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: ext Michael Hammer [mailto:mhammer@cisco.com] >>>>> Sent: 15.December.2003 18:17 >>>>> To: Khartabil Hisham (NMP-MSW/Helsinki) >>>>> Cc: xcon@ietf.org >>>>> Subject: Re: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Related to this is there a requirement that, while not >>>> revealing the >>>>> identity of a hidden user, the conference policy contains >>>>> state indication >>>>> about either the presence of hidden users, or the >>>>> possibility/preclusion >>>>> that such hidden users may be present? >>>>> >>>>> I am anticipating that: >>>>> 1) Laws may exist that require notification of such. >>>> >>>> That's a good point. This might require changes to the >>>> conference event package to indicate if there are hidden >>>> participants or not, and if so, how many. >>>> >>>> The question remain: is there a need for such a feature (to >>>> hide users?)? >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> Hisham >>>> >>>>> 2) In some conferences, participants may want technical >>>>> assurance that >>>>> hidden users are not possible before they speak. >>>>> >>>>> Mike >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> At 02:55 PM 12/15/2003 +0200, hisham.khartabil@nokia.com wrote: >>>>>> This is in reference to requirements REQ-A7 and REQ-E10 in >>>>> >>>> http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-xcon-cpcp-reqs-00.txt >>>>> >>>>> REQ-A7: It SHOULD be possible to participate in a >>> conference as a >>>>> hidden user. Hidden user is present in a conference, but >>>> his presence >>>>> is not revealed. >>>>> >>>>> REQ-E10: It MUST be possible to allow and disallow >>>> hidden membership >>>>> in a conference. >>>>> >>>>> Should a conference policy, using CPCP, specify if a user >>>> can be hidden? >>>>> This means that the conference state package does not report the >>>>> participation on the hidden user. CPCP is used to identify >>>> which users are >>>>> hidden. The list of hidden users is only manipulated by a >>>> privileged user >>>>> such as the moderator. >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> Hisham >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> XCON mailing list >>>>> XCON@ietf.org >>>>> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xcon >>>> >>>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> XCON mailing list >>> XCON@ietf.org >>> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xcon >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> XCON mailing list >>> XCON@ietf.org >>> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xcon >>> >>> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> XCON mailing list >> XCON@ietf.org >> https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xcon >> > > >_______________________________________________ >XCON mailing list >XCON@ietf.org >https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xcon This message has been scanned for viruses by MailControl - www.mailcontrol.com _______________________________________________ XCON mailing list XCON@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xcon
- [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants hisham.khartabil
- RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants Rosen, Brian
- RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants hisham.khartabil
- Re: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants Michael Hammer
- RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants Michael Hammer
- RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants hisham.khartabil
- RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants hisham.khartabil
- RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants Michael Hammer
- RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants hisham.khartabil
- RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants Drage, Keith (Keith)
- RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants Drage, Keith (Keith)
- RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants Eric Burger
- RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants hisham.khartabil
- Re: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants Cullen Jennings
- RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants Chris Boulton
- RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants Drage, Keith (Keith)
- RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants hisham.khartabil
- RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants Eric Burger
- Re: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants Rohan Mahy
- RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants hisham.khartabil
- RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants Adam Roach
- Re: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants Rohan Mahy
- RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants Adam Roach
- Re: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants Rohan Mahy
- RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants Drage, Keith (Keith)