RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants
"Eric Burger" <eburger@snowshore.com> Tue, 20 January 2004 16:05 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org ([132.151.1.19]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA08103 for <xcon-archive@odin.ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 11:05:18 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AiyN1-00053T-I9 for xcon-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 11:04:51 -0500
Received: (from exim@localhost) by www1.ietf.org (8.12.8/8.12.8/Submit) id i0KG4po9019419 for xcon-archive@odin.ietf.org; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 11:04:51 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AiyN1-000538-C6 for xcon-web-archive@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 11:04:51 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA08028 for <xcon-web-archive@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 11:04:46 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AiyMx-0001PQ-00 for xcon-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 11:04:47 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AiyM7-0001K1-00 for xcon-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 11:03:55 -0500
Received: from [132.151.1.19] (helo=optimus.ietf.org) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AiyLD-0001DG-00 for xcon-web-archive@ietf.org; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 11:02:59 -0500
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AiyLF-0004mg-BC; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 11:03:01 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AiyKq-0004lu-I8 for xcon@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 11:02:36 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id LAA07763 for <xcon@ietf.org>; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 11:02:32 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AiyKo-0001Ax-00 for xcon@ietf.org; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 11:02:34 -0500
Received: from exim by ietf-mx with spam-scanned (Exim 4.12) id 1AiyJp-00016i-00 for xcon@ietf.org; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 11:01:34 -0500
Received: from goalie.snowshore.com ([216.57.133.4] helo=webshield.office.snowshore.com) by ietf-mx with smtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AiyJS-000137-00 for xcon@ietf.org; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 11:01:10 -0500
Received: from zoe.office.snowshore.com(192.168.1.172) by webshield.office.snowshore.com via csmap id 18441; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 11:03:12 -0500 (EST)
X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft Exchange V6.0.6249.0
content-class: urn:content-classes:message
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 11:00:39 -0500
Message-ID: <4A3384433CE2AB46A63468CB207E209DB1A05C@zoe.office.snowshore.com>
Thread-Topic: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants
Thread-Index: AcPGIWcIlTiXGJmISm6SBXk6+COhvwY1RK8A
From: Eric Burger <eburger@snowshore.com>
To: xcon@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Sender: xcon-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: xcon-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: xcon@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xcon>, <mailto:xcon-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Centralized Conferencing <xcon.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:xcon@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xcon-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xcon>, <mailto:xcon-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60 (1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on ietf-mx.ietf.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=5.0 tests=none autolearn=no version=2.60
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Would Legal Intercept be in or out? E.g., hidden participants that CANNOT be known. > -----Original Message----- > From: Drage, Keith (Keith) [mailto:drage@lucent.com] > Sent: Friday, December 19, 2003 6:14 AM > To: hisham.khartabil@nokia.com; mhammer@cisco.com > Cc: xcon@ietf.org > Subject: RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants > > > I believe hidden users are appropriate. > > I do not believe that this adds complexity to the > specifications (particularly to the specification of CPCP), > so I see no need to make it a DEFER as far as the > specifications are concerned. It may add complexity to the > implementation, so I am quite happy to see it a MAY in the > requirements, so that it is optional to implement. > > As regards the legal implications of hidden users, then yes, > there may be priveleged users that are able to request the > identity of hidden users (along with an indication that they > are hidden). This of course requires the enabling of such a > privileged user in the first place. > > Secondly, it may not be necessary to identify hidden users, > but merely that there are hidden users in the conference (in > addition to any that may have made themselves visible). Some > countries require some form of tone or announcement on voice > conferences when someone else is listening in. They also > require an announcement or other indication in the call is > being recorded. > > regards > > Keith > > Keith Drage > Lucent Technologies > drage@lucent.com > tel: +44 1793 776249 > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: hisham.khartabil@nokia.com [mailto:hisham.khartabil@nokia.com] > > Sent: 15 December 2003 16:29 > > To: mhammer@cisco.com > > Cc: xcon@ietf.org > > Subject: RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants > > > > > > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: ext Michael Hammer [mailto:mhammer@cisco.com] > > > Sent: 15.December.2003 18:17 > > > To: Khartabil Hisham (NMP-MSW/Helsinki) > > > Cc: xcon@ietf.org > > > Subject: Re: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants > > > > > > > > > Related to this is there a requirement that, while not > > revealing the > > > identity of a hidden user, the conference policy contains > > > state indication > > > about either the presence of hidden users, or the > > > possibility/preclusion > > > that such hidden users may be present? > > > > > > I am anticipating that: > > > 1) Laws may exist that require notification of such. > > > > That's a good point. This might require changes to the > > conference event package to indicate if there are hidden > > participants or not, and if so, how many. > > > > The question remain: is there a need for such a feature (to > > hide users?)? > > > > Regards, > > Hisham > > > > > 2) In some conferences, participants may want technical > > > assurance that > > > hidden users are not possible before they speak. > > > > > > Mike > > > > > > > > > At 02:55 PM 12/15/2003 +0200, hisham.khartabil@nokia.com wrote: > > > >This is in reference to requirements REQ-A7 and REQ-E10 in > > > > >http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-xcon-cpcp-reqs-00.txt > > > > > > REQ-A7: It SHOULD be possible to participate in a > conference as a > > > hidden user. Hidden user is present in a conference, but > > his presence > > > is not revealed. > > > > > > REQ-E10: It MUST be possible to allow and disallow > > hidden membership > > > in a conference. > > > > > >Should a conference policy, using CPCP, specify if a user > > can be hidden? > > >This means that the conference state package does not report the > > >participation on the hidden user. CPCP is used to identify > > which users are > > >hidden. The list of hidden users is only manipulated by a > > privileged user > > >such as the moderator. > > > > > >Regards, > > >Hisham > > > > > >_______________________________________________ > > >XCON mailing list > > >XCON@ietf.org > > >https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xcon > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > XCON mailing list > XCON@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xcon > > _______________________________________________ > XCON mailing list > XCON@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xcon > > _______________________________________________ XCON mailing list XCON@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xcon
- [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants hisham.khartabil
- RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants Rosen, Brian
- RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants hisham.khartabil
- Re: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants Michael Hammer
- RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants Michael Hammer
- RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants hisham.khartabil
- RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants hisham.khartabil
- RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants Michael Hammer
- RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants hisham.khartabil
- RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants Drage, Keith (Keith)
- RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants Drage, Keith (Keith)
- RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants Eric Burger
- RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants hisham.khartabil
- Re: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants Cullen Jennings
- RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants Chris Boulton
- RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants Drage, Keith (Keith)
- RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants hisham.khartabil
- RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants Eric Burger
- Re: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants Rohan Mahy
- RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants hisham.khartabil
- RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants Adam Roach
- Re: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants Rohan Mahy
- RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants Adam Roach
- Re: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants Rohan Mahy
- RE: [XCON] CPCP Requirement: Hidden Participants Drage, Keith (Keith)