Re: [xmpp] Consensus Call on Adoption of POSH

Philipp Hancke <fippo@goodadvice.pages.de> Mon, 06 January 2014 22:14 UTC

Return-Path: <fippo@goodadvice.pages.de>
X-Original-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7EE221AE0CD for <xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Jan 2014 14:14:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id zxXaUHnyQBlT for <xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Jan 2014 14:14:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from lo.psyced.org (lost.IN.psyced.org [188.40.42.221]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DE3A51ACCE8 for <xmpp@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Jan 2014 14:14:44 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.2.105] (p54973F78.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [84.151.63.120]) (authenticated bits=0) by lo.psyced.org (8.14.3/8.14.3/Debian-9.4) with ESMTP id s06MEYTn007998 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for <xmpp@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Jan 2014 23:14:35 +0100
Message-ID: <52CB2AC3.5010906@goodadvice.pages.de>
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 23:14:27 +0100
From: Philipp Hancke <fippo@goodadvice.pages.de>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.2.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: xmpp@ietf.org
References: <3E197582-9715-4FE9-AA4A-322FDC18F301@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <3E197582-9715-4FE9-AA4A-322FDC18F301@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [xmpp] Consensus Call on Adoption of POSH
X-BeenThere: xmpp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: XMPP Working Group <xmpp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xmpp/>
List-Post: <mailto:xmpp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 22:14:47 -0000

> Should we adopt https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-miller-posh/ as a working group item in support of the aforementioned chartered work? Keep in mind that acceptance does not mean the work group thinks the draft is absolutely correct or complete. It merely means that we think that the draft is a good start towards the milestone.
>
> Please send your opinions to the XMPP working group by Jan 20.

Yes -- it solves a deployment problem and improves the current 
situation. I have some rough running code for it. It seems to be easy to 
implement, the specification is well written.

I do FWIW not think that it solves the milestone you mention (we have 
DNA for that), but it's an important building block.