IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [xmpp] Consensus Call on Adoption of POSH

Matthew Wild <mwild1@gmail.com> Mon, 06 January 2014 22:16 UTC

Return-Path: <mwild1@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 310031AE282 for <xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Jan 2014 14:16:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.75
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.75 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_ENVFROM_END_DIGIT=0.25, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id AWj-C49T6kPe for <xmpp@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 6 Jan 2014 14:16:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wi0-x22d.google.com (mail-wi0-x22d.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c05::22d]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B95781AE27E for <xmpp@ietf.org>; Mon, 6 Jan 2014 14:16:51 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wi0-f173.google.com with SMTP id hn9so3410153wib.0 for <xmpp@ietf.org>; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 14:16:42 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=Rml7NCfPEWSCUwYWQJGoMsYlrmw508VexWpLaqGPhQ4=; b=RRMFgcm+vZoxE2QCCCYeVVBtuhKTzto/gmTsyv+SVx+4UogxRnoHSjCawBripGMWu/ O2MIdpwLrG+WX4p38teD4yQNR45H2ZWHa6JsI+aNWBeeKP+mjiBUFgdWH+Tkp+sAswEA 8oD5iSLoouvQ1pVzgWhanAcMJt5jyHKULG8ylM5gCn24T1Vs1lP6Zf0uY8VNH/7USbHR EfYjWXXxQKukaPv1IBtcyHRYXeHpd4r8mHL8ViQkCEKKpN9tJVhBBVw/IY1BlBaV42BP Eon6hiapBtohdCuNJGSshP7AxUmX+Bsw/irL1+0H1mG4jILDQWzRDKnSIjguvlf/ncEp w21g==
X-Received: by 10.180.206.41 with SMTP id ll9mr14013163wic.7.1389046602704; Mon, 06 Jan 2014 14:16:42 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.227.24.74 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Jan 2014 14:16:22 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <3E197582-9715-4FE9-AA4A-322FDC18F301@nostrum.com>
References: <3E197582-9715-4FE9-AA4A-322FDC18F301@nostrum.com>
From: Matthew Wild <mwild1@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 22:16:22 +0000
Message-ID: <CAJt9-x4OuNwE1PyG+OBY_VeiLTAjGUEMpYzDrs88=ft+gktVCA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Cc: XMPP Group <xmpp@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [xmpp] Consensus Call on Adoption of POSH
X-BeenThere: xmpp@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: XMPP Working Group <xmpp.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/xmpp/>
List-Post: <mailto:xmpp@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xmpp>, <mailto:xmpp-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2014 22:16:53 -0000

On 6 January 2014 22:07, Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> wrote:
> Should we adopt https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-miller-posh/ as a working group item in support of the aforementioned chartered work? Keep in mind that acceptance does not mean the work group thinks the draft is absolutely correct or complete. It merely means that we think that the draft is a good start towards the milestone.

Yes, we should. It fills a necessary gap, and we have experimental
implementations already without any major issues.

Regards,
Matthew

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email