Re: [xrblock] no meeting at IETF 101 (?)

"Huangyihong (Rachel)" <rachel.huang@huawei.com> Mon, 22 January 2018 08:16 UTC

Return-Path: <rachel.huang@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0ED9A124205 for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 00:16:45 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.23
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.23 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nHEKdLQRotwj for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 00:16:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [194.213.3.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 731471200B9 for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 00:16:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from LHREML711-CAH.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.108]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 72FE777B84265 for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 08:16:38 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from NKGEML413-HUB.china.huawei.com (10.98.56.74) by LHREML711-CAH.china.huawei.com (10.201.108.34) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.361.1; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 08:16:30 +0000
Received: from NKGEML513-MBS.china.huawei.com ([169.254.2.231]) by NKGEML413-HUB.china.huawei.com ([10.98.56.74]) with mapi id 14.03.0361.001; Mon, 22 Jan 2018 16:16:25 +0800
From: "Huangyihong (Rachel)" <rachel.huang@huawei.com>
To: Dan Romascanu <dromasca@gmail.com>
CC: xrblock <xrblock@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [xrblock] no meeting at IETF 101 (?)
Thread-Index: AQHTkq64Btv0VP8aL0ydNzReyTxYrqN/G/QA///fBQCAAInyEP//gOmAgACGrqA=
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 08:16:25 +0000
Message-ID: <51E6A56BD6A85142B9D172C87FC3ABBB9C68A25C@nkgeml513-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <CAFgnS4WpSVb8TybG+5ttowsxYc7zo2aqGVbg4TfXPJkNcfJ5PQ@mail.gmail.com> <51E6A56BD6A85142B9D172C87FC3ABBB9C68A1B3@nkgeml513-mbs.china.huawei.com> <CAFgnS4WC7fdktwL9NsKnrQUzW8B6ihhW-AyDyg4PVnPmGaNkHA@mail.gmail.com> <51E6A56BD6A85142B9D172C87FC3ABBB9C68A22A@nkgeml513-mbs.china.huawei.com> <CAFgnS4WL0u=tu1=-jHXgZXg5FLsLw5w8WxGHJjbH-y7nCNgRmA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFgnS4WL0u=tu1=-jHXgZXg5FLsLw5w8WxGHJjbH-y7nCNgRmA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.134.153.152]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_51E6A56BD6A85142B9D172C87FC3ABBB9C68A25Cnkgeml513mbschi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xrblock/62hkIhkI4zETO4nzjX8U9Z5e2Fk>
Subject: Re: [xrblock] no meeting at IETF 101 (?)
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xrblock/>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 08:16:45 -0000

Hi Dan,

Sure, I’ll be there.

BR,
Rachel

From: Dan Romascanu [mailto:dromasca@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2018 4:12 PM
To: Huangyihong (Rachel)
Cc: xrblock
Subject: Re: [xrblock] no meeting at IETF 101 (?)

Hi Rachel,

We can discuss about a joint meeting with the other WGs chairs, but we need to decide fast, as the deadline for WG meetings request is 2/2. Will you be in London to drive the discussions on this topic?

Please encourage your colleagues to send to the mail list a message concerning the effective loss index draft and asking for a slot on the meeting agenda.

Thanks and Regards,

Dan




On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 9:56 AM, Huangyihong (Rachel) <rachel.huang@huawei.com<mailto:rachel.huang@huawei.com>> wrote:
Hi Dan,

Do you think it is possible to have a joint meeting with AVTcore or payload. I’m sure it is not just xr metrics, but also some basic RTCP metrics?

And I don’t think it is sufficient to be only discussed in ippm because ippm just provide the way for metrics to register if required, but ippm doesn’t have RTP experts and hence cannot decide which RTP metrics should be registered.

BTW, my colleagues also want to discuss effective loss index draft, I believe.

BR,
Rachel

From: Dan Romascanu [mailto:dromasca@gmail.com<mailto:dromasca@gmail.com>]
Sent: Monday, January 22, 2018 3:33 PM
To: Huangyihong (Rachel)
Cc: xrblock
Subject: Re: [xrblock] no meeting at IETF 101 (?)

Hi Rachel,

Do you believe that the WG needs to meet at IETF 101 or can we entertain this discussion on the mail list (and possibly ask for a slot in the IPPM meeting)?
Thanks and Regards,
Dan

On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 7:51 AM, Huangyihong (Rachel) <rachel.huang@huawei.com<mailto:rachel.huang@huawei.com>> wrote:
Hi Dan,

I think it’s better to discuss the ippm initial registries for xrblock metrics, if possible.

BR,
Rachel

From: xrblock [mailto:xrblock-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:xrblock-bounces@ietf.org>] On Behalf Of Dan Romascanu
Sent: Sunday, January 21, 2018 7:55 PM
To: xrblock
Subject: [xrblock] no meeting at IETF 101 (?)

Hi,
There has been little activity lately on the mail list, and I am not aware about any new proposals. It does not seem that there is any need for xrblock to meet at IETF 101. Please let know the WG mail list of any other opinions before Monday 1/29. If there are no requests or comments I will push the 'no meeting' button.
Thanks and Regards,
Dan