Re: [xrblock] no meeting at IETF 101 (?)
Dan Romascanu <dromasca@gmail.com> Mon, 22 January 2018 07:33 UTC
Return-Path: <dromasca@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F00AC1243FE for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 23:33:01 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id A2XCagxsiLLP for <xrblock@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 23:33:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qt0-x229.google.com (mail-qt0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c0d::229]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CF6FE120047 for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 23:32:59 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qt0-x229.google.com with SMTP id f4so18512162qtj.6 for <xrblock@ietf.org>; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 23:32:59 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=3UPYh6jPcbhCe5v6saxBB39kQ00Q3JgU60oOYmSxHNk=; b=OiUAdqfqUWZDmeU2Pwc+m3QQzwCbdrxITZGdS7bO8ptYBf1w86Rqtlmbh8NSwxAeou 8JZ+2eCsuB4o6LcP1SSqql+q4mPduN2baaKDR0q37w/3fqTemEpid82/g7iwMVKK1XOb e/8F70JXm8KbPRGbN1pj7nRhhVFsfT6I71bAEXC3MveEDNjjFuKZpVViYMoccUvWLl7f idMR76Gq2BQ/Pqic6A0rgaQU+FGsy1jUUWxMJl/jBy29Bacqahnzf4BTujo5Q4C16Zjy m3hPwj4ZTLm/RMhFmYqyd6La9Jqt0AHNyar0Z77fTICBH2QVHvhACsrqPIsgtK7MaeyO 2dHw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=3UPYh6jPcbhCe5v6saxBB39kQ00Q3JgU60oOYmSxHNk=; b=Tr2QZRs637umOTJgO5FNPEcQTm6xAmZOPBNL8V9wlcGpKuqSf+2WtTWHkm+3gEyVXr mus+9az8Z5aH7faH1utAZmvVFRpBZRUIA9VIuzHmzdQamSNnJp9dwV/4Vwk5bM4EJV2L /HhxgTfWt4XbM4FYVfZVtW7MXKIG5Xj2mhn7ejkSh6K+c5sbPby5QXYRq6eSDjPfYmvF UxfV7gq+UG4ncdWX08H0RMV7JQ0+f/llJAADbScSzS+9Mn6MfjJogNp9K2otc7s2j6Lj pjZjxpz5IyxZ0FXGEx4k+zpCYlJYWxl0KVjs6EeDL7xL7bTXPiJDpHgriC0Hv3LVm/A0 4hqw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKwxytevp7OwsbFbJHgAZ0FqnZgHU0c+aivULJruJuLtquIydf1cqUvM iyw4nIA6+xfVl/9arzK0KRfg/BtBDLySN7H0JiA=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AH8x227/VUHSBDL3rhqkJ1u5yYGjFdpSRFQCurrS8kAIfMDk9eSZD5P4NiDiJAsfPzIoNnZAedUMMeCZ7M+Nh8mYmNE=
X-Received: by 10.200.25.9 with SMTP id t9mr9705078qtj.75.1516606378872; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 23:32:58 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.140.23.147 with HTTP; Sun, 21 Jan 2018 23:32:58 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <51E6A56BD6A85142B9D172C87FC3ABBB9C68A1B3@nkgeml513-mbs.china.huawei.com>
References: <CAFgnS4WpSVb8TybG+5ttowsxYc7zo2aqGVbg4TfXPJkNcfJ5PQ@mail.gmail.com> <51E6A56BD6A85142B9D172C87FC3ABBB9C68A1B3@nkgeml513-mbs.china.huawei.com>
From: Dan Romascanu <dromasca@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 09:32:58 +0200
Message-ID: <CAFgnS4WC7fdktwL9NsKnrQUzW8B6ihhW-AyDyg4PVnPmGaNkHA@mail.gmail.com>
To: "Huangyihong (Rachel)" <rachel.huang@huawei.com>
Cc: xrblock <xrblock@ietf.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="001a11485f487a1301056358702a"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/xrblock/fLAc7xY8e4eu4CgEcvklHJbcY-I>
Subject: Re: [xrblock] no meeting at IETF 101 (?)
X-BeenThere: xrblock@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Metric Blocks for use with RTCP's Extended Report Framework working group discussion list <xrblock.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/xrblock/>
List-Post: <mailto:xrblock@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/xrblock>, <mailto:xrblock-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2018 07:33:02 -0000
Hi Rachel, Do you believe that the WG needs to meet at IETF 101 or can we entertain this discussion on the mail list (and possibly ask for a slot in the IPPM meeting)? Thanks and Regards, Dan On Mon, Jan 22, 2018 at 7:51 AM, Huangyihong (Rachel) < rachel.huang@huawei.com> wrote: > Hi Dan, > > > > I think it’s better to discuss the ippm initial registries for xrblock > metrics, if possible. > > > > BR, > > Rachel > > > > *From:* xrblock [mailto:xrblock-bounces@ietf.org] *On Behalf Of *Dan > Romascanu > *Sent:* Sunday, January 21, 2018 7:55 PM > *To:* xrblock > *Subject:* [xrblock] no meeting at IETF 101 (?) > > > > Hi, > > There has been little activity lately on the mail list, and I am not aware > about any new proposals. It does not seem that there is any need for > xrblock to meet at IETF 101. Please let know the WG mail list of any other > opinions before Monday 1/29. If there are no requests or comments I will > push the 'no meeting' button. > > Thanks and Regards, > > Dan >
- [xrblock] no meeting at IETF 101 (?) Dan Romascanu
- Re: [xrblock] no meeting at IETF 101 (?) Huangyihong (Rachel)
- Re: [xrblock] no meeting at IETF 101 (?) Dan Romascanu
- Re: [xrblock] no meeting at IETF 101 (?) Huangyihong (Rachel)
- Re: [xrblock] no meeting at IETF 101 (?) Dan Romascanu
- Re: [xrblock] no meeting at IETF 101 (?) Huangyihong (Rachel)
- Re: [xrblock] no meeting at IETF 101 (?) Qin Wu
- Re: [xrblock] no meeting at IETF 101 (?) Roni Even (A)