IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [yam] Issue #10: RFC 5321 3.9: add tiny subsection

Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it> Tue, 08 December 2009 08:06 UTC

Return-Path: <vesely@tana.it>
X-Original-To: yam@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: yam@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 83CF228C0D6 for <yam@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Dec 2009 00:06:49 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.286
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.286 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.433, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_IT=0.635, HOST_EQ_IT=1.245, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nKyFLkN+gbkb for <yam@core3.amsl.com>; Tue, 8 Dec 2009 00:06:48 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wmail.tana.it (www.tana.it [62.94.243.226]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E5C5828C0CE for <yam@ietf.org>; Tue, 8 Dec 2009 00:06:47 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mach-4.tana.it (mach-4.tana.it [194.243.254.189]) (AUTH: CRAM-MD5 ale@tana.it, TLS: TLS1.0, 256bits, RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1) by wmail.tana.it with esmtp; Tue, 08 Dec 2009 09:06:32 +0100 id 00000000005DC02F.000000004B1E0908.00007A0D
Message-ID: <4B1E0967.1040006@tana.it>
Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 09:08:07 +0100
From: Alessandro Vesely <vesely@tana.it>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (Macintosh/20090812)
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: SM <sm@resistor.net>
References: <6.2.5.6.2.20091206014538.033cdcc8@elandnews.com> <4B1BE2D5.9010405@tana.it> <6.2.5.6.2.20091206102946.04601b90@resistor.net> <01NGXSHS3NUQ0000BI@mauve.mrochek.com> <4B1CDDE8.2090100@tana.it> <6.2.5.6.2.20091207072413.047ff4a0@resistor.net>
In-Reply-To: <6.2.5.6.2.20091207072413.047ff4a0@resistor.net>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Cc: yam@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [yam] Issue #10: RFC 5321 3.9: add tiny subsection
X-BeenThere: yam@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Yet Another Mail working group discussion list <yam.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/yam>
List-Post: <mailto:yam@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/yam>, <mailto:yam-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 08:06:49 -0000

SM wrote:
> At 02:50 07-12-2009, Alessandro Vesely wrote:
>> Recovering a sound definition of the term "forwarding" is the main 
>> purpose for that change.
>
> Are you sure that fits under Section 3.9?

No, it's a tentative guess. That section currently contributes to 
make it ill-defined. Eliding the term or replacing it with "mailing 
lists" may better that state of affairs with minimal changes. 
Alternatively, slightly restructuring the section may be an occasion 
to reword it and also restate the concept of forwarding and its 
implications.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email