Re: [Asrg] DNS basics, was overloading server names doesn't workRe: [Asrg] DNS basics, was overloading server names doesn't work
Dave CROCKER
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/sygwAl-DfH_CasHUD3zrRtJeoC0/
220346
1075114
Re: [Asrg] ARF traffic, was Spam button scenariosRe: [Asrg] ARF traffic, was Spam button scenarios
Chris Lewis
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/FOeY8OsnSmt5rVpRV6wJbzC9NyM/
220345
1075112
Re: [Asrg] ARF traffic, was Spam button scenariosRe: [Asrg] ARF traffic, was Spam button scenarios
Steve Atkins
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/BY574-x5HVVdleu8yT0eTAK8i6c/
220344
1075112
Re: [Asrg] ARF traffic, was Spam button scenariosRe: [Asrg] ARF traffic, was Spam button scenarios
Alessandro Vesely
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/q8B5dn6rZ7VGxLMmhuodydhMbik/
220343
1075112
Re: [Asrg] ARF traffic, was Spam button scenariosRe: [Asrg] ARF traffic, was Spam button scenarios
Steve Atkins
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/DPqZHDgPkitkiY-K3HenhQWiRyQ/
220342
1075112
Re: [Asrg] Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3)Re: [Asrg] Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3)
Ian Eiloart
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/Cm8vLD51x14FuLSFXVNJHM92eTc/
220341
1075114
Re: [Asrg] ARF traffic, was Spam button scenariosRe: [Asrg] ARF traffic, was Spam button scenarios
Ian Eiloart
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/-YJDrf8NpdeY13pgOzn7S9HnrGQ/
220340
1075112
Re: [Asrg] Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3)Re: [Asrg] Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3)
Andrew Richards
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/DbZgpWxh4fu2QDBvXxkBvw2oSNM/
220339
1075114
Re: [Asrg] DNS basics, was overloading server names doesn't workRe: [Asrg] DNS basics, was overloading server names doesn't work
John R Levine
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/iMcLN36GeRoHBOdEGrWX1LGwpuk/
220338
1075114
Re: [Asrg] overloading server names doesn't work, was who has the messageRe: [Asrg] overloading server names doesn't work, was who has the message
Dave CROCKER
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/7Zvoxlu5QkMR5xGd0Dml80IS4b8/
220337
1075114
Re: [Asrg] ARF traffic, was Spam button scenariosRe: [Asrg] ARF traffic, was Spam button scenarios
Steve Atkins
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/dpAKdSoX-iznWtIUKS1sJrYrsCM/
220336
1075112
Re: [Asrg] overloading server names doesn't work, was who has the messageRe: [Asrg] overloading server names doesn't work, was who has the message
John R Levine
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/flKoj8wJN_iIwysnaQYbzz2V24A/
220335
1075114
[Asrg] ARF traffic, was Spam button scenarios[Asrg] ARF traffic, was Spam button scenarios
Alessandro Vesely
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/DIXYJQqX3K-AEgdnLoWpeIIr5-c/
220334
1075112
Re: [Asrg] Generally workable ways of adding a spam button to MUAsRe: [Asrg] Generally workable ways of adding a spam button to MUAs
Ian Eiloart
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/-qNDSWBuwD3LuT-iX89dM3w3ZBc/
220333
1075121
Re: [Asrg] Generally workable ways of adding a spam button to MUAsRe: [Asrg] Generally workable ways of adding a spam button to MUAs
Alessandro Vesely
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/8bHdgTQuAfRSj_BDhB7n5aUzlzw/
220332
1075121
Re: [Asrg] who has the message (was Re: Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3))Re: [Asrg] who has the message (was Re: Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3))
Paul Russell
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/81zC92aY2GN7t-6DXD11aiCt8hE/
220331
1075114
Re: [Asrg] overloading server names doesn't work, was who has the messageRe: [Asrg] overloading server names doesn't work, was who has the message
Dave CROCKER
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/jBYWFCdMJsCShQZ1Dk287HrsyME/
220330
1075114
Re: [Asrg] who has the message (was Re: Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3))Re: [Asrg] who has the message (was Re: Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3))
Ian Eiloart
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/zlIDyP1YtEtnkh-liJL3kvt2DcA/
220329
1075114
Re: [Asrg] Spam button scenariosRe: [Asrg] Spam button scenarios
Ian Eiloart
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/UQliv20AKL1t4R6dDV4vyo-skTY/
220328
1075112
Re: [Asrg] Spam button scenariosRe: [Asrg] Spam button scenarios
Ian Eiloart
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/EtCZsB2AOCoYB5DLx9MrNV35yYs/
220327
1075112
Re: [Asrg] who has the message (was Re: Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3))Re: [Asrg] who has the message (was Re: Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3))
Andrew Richards
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/0BJMemnzh3kXGxKrGnCXARV1Wbo/
220326
1075114
Re: [Asrg] who has the message (was Re: Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3))Re: [Asrg] who has the message (was Re: Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3))
Ian Eiloart
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/lvMhkenXWF2q9j8ipfp8np9GbMs/
220325
1075114
Re: [Asrg] RFC5451 Re: who gets the report, was We really don't needRe: [Asrg] RFC5451 Re: who gets the report, was We really don't need
Alessandro Vesely
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/m88nDTU3PYqLsNEKtfTGgTcS9rI/
220324
1075121
Re: [Asrg] who has the message (was Re: Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3))Re: [Asrg] who has the message (was Re: Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3))
Andrew Richards
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/hihfQamuAEs9XKvnD2zLJwNna_s/
220323
1075114
Re: [Asrg] who has the message (was Re: Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3))Re: [Asrg] who has the message (was Re: Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3))
Andrew Richards
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/3GCGjBkAjMAwV3IGDqSxUXMKcmQ/
220322
1075114
Re: [Asrg] who has the message (was Re: Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3))Re: [Asrg] who has the message (was Re: Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3))
Ian Eiloart
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/ljABfE3PLKsQRA9EIsH4L-DHLu4/
220321
1075114
Re: [Asrg] Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3)Re: [Asrg] Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3)
Ian Eiloart
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/N-VyTCEKGfmLBVwKFIgSbbJ6h3A/
220320
1075114
Re: [Asrg] who has the message (was Re: Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3))Re: [Asrg] who has the message (was Re: Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3))
Ian Eiloart
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/kBbD5WLuIIgqRZ6rAG8a75BOWDE/
220319
1075114
Re: [Asrg] Adding a spam button to MUAsRe: [Asrg] Adding a spam button to MUAs
Rich Kulawiec
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/sD41fcEdJlf3JSsizxy6A6gCUpI/
220318
1075121
Re: [Asrg] Generally workable ways of adding a spam button to MUAsRe: [Asrg] Generally workable ways of adding a spam button to MUAs
Ian Eiloart
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/VsyfD_SjIjw4jECkxlmnTfywu90/
220317
1075121
Re: [Asrg] overloading server names doesn't work, was who has the messageRe: [Asrg] overloading server names doesn't work, was who has the message
Daniel Feenberg
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/N2S1Wpi61uN5hxXTAP38wkT0cjY/
220316
1075114
Re: [Asrg] Generally workable ways of adding a spam button to MUAsRe: [Asrg] Generally workable ways of adding a spam button to MUAs
Ian Eiloart
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/x8Od9c3pYn7BHALDgkJtRCxND14/
220315
1075121
Re: [Asrg] MX, was Adding a spam button to MUAsRe: [Asrg] MX, was Adding a spam button to MUAs
Ian Eiloart
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/PMBHF7jhZTu3hCFY8iFyY1Kai6s/
220314
1075121
Re: [Asrg] who gets the report, was We really don't needRe: [Asrg] who gets the report, was We really don't need
Ian Eiloart
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/HL8NgHUaxUEJFZFiPJfAKVfAVRU/
220313
1075121
Re: [Asrg] RFC5451 Re: who gets the report, was We really don't needRe: [Asrg] RFC5451 Re: who gets the report, was We really don't need
Ian Eiloart
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/rwD4AZhN5ZtVXeI46y19r9pgnK4/
220312
1075121
Re: [Asrg] We really don't need no stinkin IMAP or POP foram button to MRe: [Asrg] We really don't need no stinkin IMAP or POP foram button to M
Ian Eiloart
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/wJ608jnUpJ2KMgip98LFlT9btmM/
220311
1075121
Re: [Asrg] Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3)Re: [Asrg] Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3)
Bill Cole
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/s-ZgN5gTm9IIywUwupqTGRnH5oY/
220310
1075114
Re: [Asrg] overloading server names doesn't work, was who has the messageRe: [Asrg] overloading server names doesn't work, was who has the message
John R Levine
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/5Zl2t5wM7lCTeT6JRq3HbPvIPjM/
220309
1075114
Re: [Asrg] who has the message (was Re: Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3))Re: [Asrg] who has the message (was Re: Consensus Call - submission via posting (was Re: Iteration #3))
Dave CROCKER
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/DOS46I9JI78dpsAquA78d4coov8/
220308
1075114
Re: [Asrg] What can we expect MUAs to do?Re: [Asrg] What can we expect MUAs to do?
Steve Atkins
2010-02-09
asrg
/arch/msg/asrg/34O-xUyb0ILbSqM66EYf1JLV_Yo/
220307
1075113
40 Messages