Re: Long overdue review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc4941bis-00Re: Long overdue review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc4941bis-00
Mark Smith
2019-03-06
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/uR_uILySu_x5Z_ClXTQU2xOpdaE/
2701257
1829291
6man - Requested sessions have been scheduled for IETF 1046man - Requested sessions have been scheduled for IETF 104
"IETF Secretariat"
2019-03-05
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/SzAGR9P0JRpFgKig2rm8GCwdyQ8/
2701150
1830013
RE: Comment on draft-bonica-6man-vpn-dest-opt-02RE: Comment on draft-bonica-6man-vpn-dest-opt-02
Ron Bonica
2019-03-04
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/76lAE1SqD52uK9awkCa2Z5DKcFc/
2700541
1829503
RE: Comments on draft-bonica-6man-oam-00RE: Comments on draft-bonica-6man-oam-00
Ron Bonica
2019-03-04
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/tG7ODPvOsDxPfJmkw-ohZnaYnTU/
2700531
1829502
RE: Segment Routing DraftsRE: Segment Routing Drafts
Ron Bonica
2019-03-04
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/ncZvA37gXZbpD8n0kAsdZE-MQGo/
2700524
1829074
Re: Functioning of 6manRe: Functioning of 6man
Jan Zorz - Go6
2019-03-04
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/aSjn2LJFeg1oxZFgqG3Bn25UY44/
2700289
1828193
Re: Long overdue review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc4941bis-00Re: Long overdue review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc4941bis-00
Fernando Gont
2019-03-03
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/oNZZYVYueEGFbeKzB4SyFCalWho/
2700042
1829291
Re: Segment Routing DraftsRe: Segment Routing Drafts
Tom Herbert
2019-03-02
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/bk5oLPiR2iXIH9FmecuIGb5NiAc/
2699870
1829074
Re: Segment Routing DraftsRe: Segment Routing Drafts
Brian E Carpenter
2019-03-02
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/hJidDROf0fwhp_XVH8dRBCHsK4E/
2699863
1829074
Re: Segment Routing DraftsRe: Segment Routing Drafts
Tom Herbert
2019-03-02
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/3DbCiY5KNHhJVWFROYu8vI7LWcw/
2699861
1829074
Comment on draft-bonica-6man-vpn-dest-opt-02Comment on draft-bonica-6man-vpn-dest-opt-02
Tom Herbert
2019-03-02
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/g3JCUKOKNbrAuEOaHbbAnMV34lQ/
2699857
1829503
Re: Segment Routing DraftsRe: Segment Routing Drafts
Brian E Carpenter
2019-03-02
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/LvCjBAKJB46msorWx3kk5zR5ElQ/
2699855
1829074
Comments on draft-bonica-6man-oam-00Comments on draft-bonica-6man-oam-00
Tom Herbert
2019-03-02
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/nwHdfMlwZmCprFQioDnZnTw_RnI/
2699854
1829502
Re: Segment Routing DraftsRe: Segment Routing Drafts
Fred Baker
2019-03-01
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/3NAJIcjJt0pr2CYFTBUDtwy3y7M/
2699805
1829074
6man - Requested sessions have been scheduled for IETF 1046man - Requested sessions have been scheduled for IETF 104
"IETF Secretariat"
2019-03-01
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/JrghiLy_HjRSv_yk0OFueuwo4LE/
2699712
1829399
Long overdue review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc4941bis-00Long overdue review of draft-ietf-6man-rfc4941bis-00
Mark Smith
2019-03-01
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/oR3CapBcPnhUZvJoO8SQSvcurY8/
2699489
1829291
RE: there should be a ULA prefix?? [was: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios]RE: there should be a ULA prefix?? [was: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios]
STARK, BARBARA H
2019-02-28
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/neyXj06ptkZvPUvc0ric5WvhLQ4/
2699063
1825007
Re: there should be a ULA prefix?? [was: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios]Re: there should be a ULA prefix?? [was: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios]
Timothy Winters
2019-02-28
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/vDU5RDWzT4-kjwQ62agb9Dbu8sw/
2699061
1825007
Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenariosRe: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
Philip Homburg
2019-02-28
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/JZt-EHHNfyaU426RGuFOt_LCF7c/
2699055
1825007
Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenariosRe: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
Erik Kline
2019-02-28
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/CyIrlof4KbD3sHQnv1bHyxSYTMM/
2698952
1825007
Segment Routing DraftsSegment Routing Drafts
Ron Bonica
2019-02-28
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/Xd5OK-xV7rW4kL6tnt8viO-fdVs/
2698946
1829074
Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenariosRe: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
Mark Smith
2019-02-28
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/7l6bi2yVnx2boyoaA9SdDdLORwM/
2698931
1825007
Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenariosRe: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
Fred Baker
2019-02-28
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/0gO1bGcoIDQRI36Mj-esTG7kR4A/
2698901
1825007
Re: there should be a ULA prefix?? [was: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios]Re: there should be a ULA prefix?? [was: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios]
神明達哉
2019-02-28
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/Q_hZvfyel0mGySSuL_0jir4Er8o/
2698843
1825007
Re: graceful renumbering of CPE networksRe: graceful renumbering of CPE networks
Michael Richardson
2019-02-27
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/OMJEgLsLF0xNyc58IRoDhtikvYY/
2698749
1825007
Re: there should be a ULA prefix?? [was: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios]Re: there should be a ULA prefix?? [was: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios]
Tim Chown
2019-02-27
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/bTw7fK7sct66HC5mXAcnidntPgM/
2698713
1825007
Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenariosRe: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
神明達哉
2019-02-27
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/xTJbfe6-aho4VcGtFt5MnBXoE7s/
2698699
1825007
Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenariosRe: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
Richard Patterson
2019-02-27
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/UdjuDC-rqHjoP9shoybFih_3NVs/
2698686
1825007
Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenariosRe: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
Owen DeLong
2019-02-27
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/31B2XVE1v1_arEUU0Ua_hROyqXA/
2698623
1825007
Re: Functioning of 6man (was: Re: Apology)Re: Functioning of 6man (was: Re: Apology)
Lorenzo Colitti
2019-02-27
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/Xn7IJG-2dNEvK2hSVCvb40POkns/
2698514
1828193
Functioning of 6man (was: Re: Apology)Functioning of 6man (was: Re: Apology)
Ole Troan
2019-02-27
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/_JNCEDlPwHM0hNXlbRBaAYCYQvI/
2698484
1828193
Re: ApologyRe: Apology
Jan Zorz - Go6
2019-02-27
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/k74SQ7QT1gx63XrqwUBDF7rIv2s/
2698474
1828193
Re: there should be a ULA prefix?? [was: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios]Re: there should be a ULA prefix?? [was: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios]
Alexandre Petrescu
2019-02-27
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/EIVv9WcYhrG9CUpdvXsG1gK4RAQ/
2698442
1825007
Re: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenariosRe: [v6ops] A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios
Fernando Gont
2019-02-27
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/0rUHv7YTx1yetMGQC3duk5o0-ks/
2698406
1825007
Re: there should be a ULA prefix?? [was: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios]Re: there should be a ULA prefix?? [was: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios]
Mark Smith
2019-02-27
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/pS9KHySXPY9nj4MOxJ5gQz9wa3M/
2698345
1825007
Re: there should be a ULA prefix?? [was: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios]Re: there should be a ULA prefix?? [was: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios]
Brian E Carpenter
2019-02-26
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/mloZ0_2yVAUwamQf_2njxKlyhx8/
2698324
1825007
Re: there should be a ULA prefix?? [was: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios]Re: there should be a ULA prefix?? [was: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios]
Philip Homburg
2019-02-26
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/HiVAmCUkGbmpWVBXiNfW6zC9O7A/
2698313
1825007
Re: there should be a ULA prefix?? [was: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios]Re: there should be a ULA prefix?? [was: A common problem with SLAAC in "renumbering" scenarios]
Mark Smith
2019-02-26
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/AM3UEgq4akGid4SI7M_6gUwNOh8/
2698283
1825007
Re: ApologyRe: Apology
Bob Hinden
2019-02-26
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/vJShLhDVDKuGM4EomzGDexNL29g/
2698276
1828193
6MAN - IETF104 Call for agenda items6MAN - IETF104 Call for agenda items
Bob Hinden
2019-02-26
ipv6
/arch/msg/ipv6/CgE-cyc0TSGrmMfqACxjgq83rts/
2698274
1828874