Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #15: Should at least on key indicator be mandatoryRe: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #15: Should at least on key indicator be mandatory
Javier Rojas Blum
2013-04-19
jose
/arch/msg/jose/u2VT5xGP_U0wbUh2ONVNG-KYNUY/
820232
1445375
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #8: Should we add a "spi" header field?Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #8: Should we add a "spi" header field?
Javier Rojas Blum
2013-04-19
jose
/arch/msg/jose/iiXFSRpmnVOov4Gm3n-ZFWXK_io/
820231
1445378
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?
Javier Rojas Blum
2013-04-19
jose
/arch/msg/jose/HI9n4cbx4hxadbuglAsA-F-E7MM/
820230
1445377
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #7: Algorithm identifiers/parameters incompatible with WebCryptoRe: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #7: Algorithm identifiers/parameters incompatible with WebCrypto
Javier Rojas Blum
2013-04-19
jose
/arch/msg/jose/ViJgn-crJH-JAdM_7dtnVOmI0xs/
820229
1445379
Re: [jose] OAUTH and implicit key identifiersRe: [jose] OAUTH and implicit key identifiers
Mike Jones
2013-04-19
jose
/arch/msg/jose/UV3JKQhLI0WXyunQH2H1R9bVj6k/
820228
1445372
[jose] OAUTH and implicit key identifiers[jose] OAUTH and implicit key identifiers
Jim Schaad
2013-04-18
jose
/arch/msg/jose/flsTTWFRlZ39UfujPee-prLHC7k/
820227
1445372
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?
Manger, James H
2013-04-18
jose
/arch/msg/jose/wnxe3pYhyGAYWxecmZhrTonK2GY/
820226
1445377
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #15: Should at least on key indicator be mandatoryRe: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #15: Should at least on key indicator be mandatory
John Bradley
2013-04-17
jose
/arch/msg/jose/sY9RoOEsWroU0-LARWp1JuPFc48/
820225
1445375
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #8: Should we add a "spi" header field?Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #8: Should we add a "spi" header field?
John Bradley
2013-04-17
jose
/arch/msg/jose/3fV-Nc9nF563C9-9OnA2NIKbDZY/
820224
1445378
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #7: Algorithm identifiers/parameters incompatible with WebCryptoRe: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #7: Algorithm identifiers/parameters incompatible with WebCrypto
John Bradley
2013-04-17
jose
/arch/msg/jose/Ya3eQWHp-aXGChSsryYiM8H3k6A/
820223
1445379
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #8: Should we add a "spi" header field?Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #8: Should we add a "spi" header field?
Sascha Preibisch
2013-04-17
jose
/arch/msg/jose/EHpov-04-OYiQEksbufo-jwmLy4/
820222
1445378
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #7: Algorithm identifiers/parameters incompatible with WebCryptoRe: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #7: Algorithm identifiers/parameters incompatible with WebCrypto
Sascha Preibisch
2013-04-17
jose
/arch/msg/jose/Flg2l0Dic5QZcub6U6ZRzh5O3H4/
820221
1445379
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?
John Bradley
2013-04-17
jose
/arch/msg/jose/JWeEdo_vu3M5zWcD8QhCKxxaNwQ/
820220
1445377
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #15: Should at least on key indicator be mandatoryRe: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #15: Should at least on key indicator be mandatory
Sascha Preibisch
2013-04-17
jose
/arch/msg/jose/gvHb_IaJf1BQ205WW_VHKr3s3Kw/
820219
1445375
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #7: Algorithm identifiers/parameters incompatible with WebCryptoRe: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #7: Algorithm identifiers/parameters incompatible with WebCrypto
charles.marais@orange.com
2013-04-17
jose
/arch/msg/jose/l1ffGk_V2NeIzX6UEJ9LSjpvLlc/
820218
1445379
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #8: Should we add a "spi" header field?Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #8: Should we add a "spi" header field?
charles.marais@orange.com
2013-04-17
jose
/arch/msg/jose/oHffsJwAqUBrjbZrIxkSH2fCuT8/
820217
1445378
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?
charles.marais@orange.com
2013-04-17
jose
/arch/msg/jose/9mjpqpRIWDX1ZPwkPr4fBTZIBtc/
820216
1445377
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #12: Should the x5c field be removed from JWE?, ,Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #12: Should the x5c field be removed from JWE?, ,
charles.marais@orange.com
2013-04-17
jose
/arch/msg/jose/zw3IMUQfpRDJ0--YfGg72G_WAFw/
820215
1445376
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #15: Should at least on key indicator be mandatoryRe: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #15: Should at least on key indicator be mandatory
charles.marais@orange.com
2013-04-17
jose
/arch/msg/jose/zT1E_4HZldU-5wx801vHptiJ5Eo/
820214
1445375
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?
Russ Housley
2013-04-16
jose
/arch/msg/jose/_S26f4S5mubSIv8LYVWqRotfxbk/
820213
1445377
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #12: Should the x5c field be removed from JWE?, ,Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #12: Should the x5c field be removed from JWE?, ,
Richard Barnes
2013-04-16
jose
/arch/msg/jose/L6AdQYO7YGlY22zGJM8Sxo8uaJw/
820212
1445376
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #12: Should the x5c field be removed from JWE?, ,Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #12: Should the x5c field be removed from JWE?, ,
Justin Richer
2013-04-16
jose
/arch/msg/jose/JbbKQWGXBQUGkn3TzvFqcJRDM58/
820211
1445376
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #12: Should the x5c field be removed from JWE?, ,Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #12: Should the x5c field be removed from JWE?, ,
Richard Barnes
2013-04-16
jose
/arch/msg/jose/w7F3vK0EgTYfxRliZjawj1iOMhw/
820210
1445376
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #12: Should the x5c field be removed from JWE?, ,Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #12: Should the x5c field be removed from JWE?, ,
Matt Miller
2013-04-16
jose
/arch/msg/jose/4kn_LfZJ_VDDJt7VKRy4nco4gPg/
820209
1445376
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #7: Algorithm identifiers/parameters incompatible with WebCryptoRe: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #7: Algorithm identifiers/parameters incompatible with WebCrypto
Matt Miller
2013-04-16
jose
/arch/msg/jose/6F6h7E2ZdgMK9j4yJ4tiN0_72wQ/
820208
1445379
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?
Richard Barnes
2013-04-16
jose
/arch/msg/jose/jyD10mWfroVpn2Kut-WG8u6PjMM/
820207
1445377
Re: [jose] #16: URI identifying a specific key in a JWK setRe: [jose] #16: URI identifying a specific key in a JWK set
Manger, James H
2013-04-16
jose
/arch/msg/jose/2_dTqwCnoBWZ5DKyqkECDu7sXkg/
820206
1445395
[jose] Preliminary Agenda for Interim Meeting[jose] Preliminary Agenda for Interim Meeting
Jim Schaad
2013-04-16
jose
/arch/msg/jose/BuMnMgk_nkZapszGu_2vxiHGRK4/
820205
1445373
Re: [jose] #8: Direct mode for key agreement needs security analysisRe: [jose] #8: Direct mode for key agreement needs security analysis
jose issue tracker
2013-04-15
jose
/arch/msg/jose/613AcIBCv_6o1ryv6JOMSHU3sFY/
820204
1445463
Re: [jose] Proposed Agenda for Interim Working Group MeetingRe: [jose] Proposed Agenda for Interim Working Group Meeting
Mike Jones
2013-04-15
jose
/arch/msg/jose/QVqIjb82joAnY1mpEmA9Aok6g5U/
820203
1445374
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?
John Bradley
2013-04-15
jose
/arch/msg/jose/iLjIA_rAwRGdhtkaBd4dyT1rn8Y/
820202
1445377
Re: [jose] Proposed Agenda for Interim Working Group MeetingRe: [jose] Proposed Agenda for Interim Working Group Meeting
Peter Saint-Andre
2013-04-15
jose
/arch/msg/jose/xArTumUDQ3ML0_stwT2kJfLnFYk/
820201
1445374
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #8: Should we add a "spi" header field?Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #8: Should we add a "spi" header field?
Richard Barnes
2013-04-15
jose
/arch/msg/jose/E-nquYrpBR4FZkRXNNwLvmy1Zfo/
820200
1445378
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #15: Should at least on key indicator be mandatoryRe: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #15: Should at least on key indicator be mandatory
Richard Barnes
2013-04-15
jose
/arch/msg/jose/MZCuuAPtNRhuAyzAL5Wv9enF4iQ/
820199
1445375
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #15: Should at least on key indicator be mandatoryRe: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #15: Should at least on key indicator be mandatory
Edmund Jay
2013-04-15
jose
/arch/msg/jose/htGC9Jgp0_WsRqu_Kx7rYc45Fak/
820198
1445375
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #12: Should the x5c field be removed from JWE?, ,Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #12: Should the x5c field be removed from JWE?, ,
Edmund Jay
2013-04-15
jose
/arch/msg/jose/TD-cJzH4HzTCxlILnepevHGYke4/
820197
1445376
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue#11: Should we use RFC 5116 and remove the JWE Integrity Value field?
Edmund Jay
2013-04-15
jose
/arch/msg/jose/ngrM8269xTTQWhM6X5LJHBtmoD4/
820196
1445377
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #8: Should we add a "spi" header field?Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #8: Should we add a "spi" header field?
Edmund Jay
2013-04-15
jose
/arch/msg/jose/6AwHwJwbtugf7gKJtFkbYPGfe8o/
820195
1445378
Re: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #7: Algorithm identifiers/parameters incompatible with WebCryptoRe: [jose] Feedback request on jose tracker issue #7: Algorithm identifiers/parameters incompatible with WebCrypto
Edmund Jay
2013-04-15
jose
/arch/msg/jose/Kepwcshp2nhw5radn0SUyxCKdks/
820194
1445379
Re: [jose] Proposed Agenda for Interim Working Group MeetingRe: [jose] Proposed Agenda for Interim Working Group Meeting
Richard Barnes
2013-04-15
jose
/arch/msg/jose/YI22MgX9lgm1avPVdMAcSbPgJM8/
820193
1445374