Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specificationRe: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification
John Cowan
2013-10-02
json
/arch/msg/json/62UZXzwOurxIU7uh6q1jzvHCAUE/
823837
1446018
Re: [Json] section 1 paragraph 2 on what JSON can representRe: [Json] section 1 paragraph 2 on what JSON can represent
John Cowan
2013-10-02
json
/arch/msg/json/R48MhOlbWCn1_jMtXGYzsDavhb0/
823836
1446018
Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specificationRe: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification
Tony Hansen
2013-10-02
json
/arch/msg/json/yCErrgcj5eRQGA2wrmvSS_VUNjg/
823835
1446018
Re: [Json] section 1 paragraph 2 on what JSON can representRe: [Json] section 1 paragraph 2 on what JSON can represent
Tim Bray
2013-10-02
json
/arch/msg/json/IrunoP6vUEPDtL1b6ZvsUmufVpU/
823834
1446018
Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specificationRe: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification
Jorge Chamorro
2013-10-02
json
/arch/msg/json/PI-srw4jaIgDwRxdw4jWHLa-JhY/
823833
1446018
Re: [Json] section 1 paragraph 2 on what JSON can representRe: [Json] section 1 paragraph 2 on what JSON can represent
Carsten Bormann
2013-10-02
json
/arch/msg/json/BjmRzti9kty-Zf2TFp_nmhOWi80/
823832
1446018
Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specificationRe: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification
Paul Hoffman
2013-10-02
json
/arch/msg/json/nR6cIdyEM4qdDGQ-QejKMfym4Cg/
823831
1446018
Re: [Json] section 1 paragraph 2 on what JSON can representRe: [Json] section 1 paragraph 2 on what JSON can represent
Tony Hansen
2013-10-02
json
/arch/msg/json/SjshzKoMHMqc3m6iUtjVtmSCgVU/
823830
1446018
Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specificationRe: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification
R S
2013-10-02
json
/arch/msg/json/E7J5EAbgQ_uqaEO2Dt-yNCjmuc8/
823829
1446018
Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specificationRe: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification
R S
2013-10-02
json
/arch/msg/json/3qz9NY2w0kxzWTZAiG4oD1u2hv8/
823828
1446018
Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specificationRe: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification
Tony Hansen
2013-10-02
json
/arch/msg/json/GBOvM38W6zgdQz0RzWIqqg65X8Q/
823827
1446018
Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specificationRe: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification
Paul Hoffman
2013-10-02
json
/arch/msg/json/tpxXsPaptKXXjMeo-I7XsOGaBYM/
823826
1446018
Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specificationRe: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification
Carsten Bormann
2013-10-02
json
/arch/msg/json/t2ypvp7zLii6DhBQ-xff1cf6Wvg/
823825
1446018
Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specificationRe: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification
Tim Bray
2013-10-02
json
/arch/msg/json/_X1FMAq95DXjebcTgQfHBjsjTNY/
823824
1446018
Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specificationRe: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification
Tim Bray
2013-10-02
json
/arch/msg/json/XuEL6wIH3M8otj-t9ye9415ZALs/
823823
1446018
Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specificationRe: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification
Bjoern Hoehrmann
2013-10-02
json
/arch/msg/json/Pc079utkCY2N8ovEn777LO52sCI/
823822
1446018
Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specificationRe: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification
R S
2013-10-02
json
/arch/msg/json/4Jet4inSg1MtIRDnT5lW5gSTSEA/
823821
1446018
Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specificationRe: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification
Tim Bray
2013-10-02
json
/arch/msg/json/FUos4sNi4BgcvzA3fVsH-qY7jE8/
823820
1446018
Re: [Json] ECMA-262 normative?Re: [Json] ECMA-262 normative?
Carsten Bormann
2013-10-02
json
/arch/msg/json/Xh6nQcjgEAnHnB0yLet1LjSJ33M/
823819
1446018
Re: [Json] ECMA-262 normative?Re: [Json] ECMA-262 normative?
Tim Bray
2013-10-02
json
/arch/msg/json/8GFl0EUVzRo1A34sFarlEOQ-BdY/
823818
1446018
Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specificationRe: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification
Tony Hansen
2013-10-01
json
/arch/msg/json/vI9VQb0RnzKQ9y5VLzQVq29Q1n4/
823817
1446018
Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specificationRe: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification
R S
2013-10-01
json
/arch/msg/json/qymwBXqmvMbYnr2MhHg2p0Mgdf4/
823816
1446018
Re: [Json] last call timelineRe: [Json] last call timeline
Paul Hoffman
2013-10-01
json
/arch/msg/json/0uERXJvjjE3NkfDtVBCoLq6nzEY/
823815
1446017
[Json] last call timeline[Json] last call timeline
R S
2013-10-01
json
/arch/msg/json/3ukmPY-4Y_yQ6lub-XNHiQ3t2so/
823814
1446017
Re: [Json] ECMA-262 normative?Re: [Json] ECMA-262 normative?
R S
2013-10-01
json
/arch/msg/json/7l1Jj70v6HkgVDuqDNf9_oZCsRc/
823813
1446018
[Json] Change control for the MIME media type[Json] Change control for the MIME media type
Paul Hoffman
2013-09-30
json
/arch/msg/json/wFJF4OEhk8_HulOkkSX9xPAJ_lQ/
823812
1446018
Re: [Json] ECMA-262 normative?Re: [Json] ECMA-262 normative?
Eliot Lear
2013-09-30
json
/arch/msg/json/0-GezEVYsn02itCSGtagawtm8Rs/
823811
1446018
Re: [Json] ECMA-262 normative?Re: [Json] ECMA-262 normative?
Tim Bray
2013-09-30
json
/arch/msg/json/-E7gObb-3Nwjb-Yb7WLGX6DlCLw/
823810
1446018
Re: [Json] ECMA-262 normative?Re: [Json] ECMA-262 normative?
Paul Hoffman
2013-09-30
json
/arch/msg/json/NQlOdmqlaUOBwDsTdlahVt-yJRU/
823809
1446018
Re: [Json] ECMA-262 normative?Re: [Json] ECMA-262 normative?
John Cowan
2013-09-30
json
/arch/msg/json/6w09rNzFZ42sL2CMUaWn6MKRbUY/
823808
1446018
[Json] ECMA-262 normative?[Json] ECMA-262 normative?
Carsten Bormann
2013-09-30
json
/arch/msg/json/_zY_WMi0dESq1pVp02wh-GMiZT8/
823807
1446018
Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specificationRe: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification
Tony Hansen
2013-09-30
json
/arch/msg/json/HLER6s5s3p1NqDI-tUyh--dgQ_I/
823806
1446018
Re: [Json] Change Control (was: Re: Authorship)Re: [Json] Change Control (was: Re: Authorship)
Jorge Chamorro
2013-09-30
json
/arch/msg/json/7_AjwrtUoBIKckCspbitnsGiB68/
823805
1446018
Re: [Json] Indentation (was: Re: Change Control)Re: [Json] Indentation (was: Re: Change Control)
Carsten Bormann
2013-09-30
json
/arch/msg/json/N__U8FPCqbYwNHueTnD0-TPnGrs/
823804
1446018
Re: [Json] Indentation (was: Re: Change Control)Re: [Json] Indentation (was: Re: Change Control)
Carsten Bormann
2013-09-30
json
/arch/msg/json/VBvLiEmgYFHMKuJL-kCKDPWDEiY/
823803
1446018
[Json] Indentation (was: Re: Change Control)[Json] Indentation (was: Re: Change Control)
Martin J. Dürst
2013-09-30
json
/arch/msg/json/Ul-uRWew8wAqmLR-AMAFzb5mZ9w/
823802
1446018
[Json] Change Control (was: Re: Authorship)[Json] Change Control (was: Re: Authorship)
Martin J. Dürst
2013-09-30
json
/arch/msg/json/3iqTfN_fjjf4i-9jeQNRq_h5eMw/
823801
1446018
Re: [Json] -0.0Re: [Json] -0.0
Carsten Bormann
2013-09-30
json
/arch/msg/json/Eqn0364Zc76JChCzvTL97B_pzoo/
823800
1446018
Re: [Json] -0.0Re: [Json] -0.0
John Cowan
2013-09-30
json
/arch/msg/json/J5BUOBHPRMhjEhfFr2OjfEg_FhM/
823799
1446018
Re: [Json] -0.0Re: [Json] -0.0
R S
2013-09-30
json
/arch/msg/json/wxBytpDn9GWcPqBuWB-p42OCAdE/
823798
1446018