IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification

Jorge Chamorro <jorge@jorgechamorro.com> Wed, 02 October 2013 20:27 UTC

Return-Path: <jorge@jorgechamorro.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D38F621F8793 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 13:27:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id O6zcnQi03eZJ for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 13:27:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-we0-f176.google.com (mail-we0-f176.google.com [74.125.82.176]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BAEE121F89A6 for <json@ietf.org>; Wed, 2 Oct 2013 13:22:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-we0-f176.google.com with SMTP id u56so1574071wes.35 for <json@ietf.org>; Wed, 02 Oct 2013 13:22:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:mime-version:content-type:from :in-reply-to:date:cc:content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references :to; bh=MPhI3rRZbCvgU/QDNwejc2Yc3GfJkuXG8/tL6fYVN3A=; b=DuL4Sxhr96mwHtXH7T9pszVI5lsTIaARV3Ud6Px3AT7xBz4v2HF9PWh8Wb23F0l76x mqa7KfAOgTdke5JTzv1EwOlDqBopdjmuT3syOw88DlnxUnCcL5p5x9R80N+Nk8iyzoe5 CHZqs2KmMfaYM2rRqjcmNMdgBB6qaIvxtnUheMgL5X7zWUzGyqGRilXQhAujhyCE8V2U Vr3WtWdjC/hoTKTTAKJ3z67UCZBS+nRIWjr3Iq6G8GsaRYyfNycTtrpzt+jslQIxtQ39 7OnnMKXrIXw1F2OazxJLIZ9SldfzDIH1D4Xzd1Rshn2sYD7d/o8O15Vv76WC2pRj7HST NJkg==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQkaBBYJ9TMplbqJIJCmmFFn+rWKkbc6pKgu8ibSNHCYxfwAtQ5Hr2aynAiIPSPzFgMiKE/3
X-Received: by 10.194.21.131 with SMTP id v3mr3883152wje.44.1380745348443; Wed, 02 Oct 2013 13:22:28 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.10.50] ([80.30.54.184]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPSA id l9sm19949464wif.10.1969.12.31.16.00.00 (version=TLSv1 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Wed, 02 Oct 2013 13:22:28 -0700 (PDT)
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1085)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
From: Jorge Chamorro <jorge@jorgechamorro.com>
In-Reply-To: <524C73B7.1060104@att.com>
Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 22:22:25 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <B372C5DB-2776-4921-9AF3-74051FAFD1DC@jorgechamorro.com>
References: <BF7E36B9C495A6468E8EC573603ED9411EF1BB0B@xmb-aln-x11.cisco.com> <CAChr6SyznBktmOLpT-EiZ5Nm_0jZ16M0tOo4aZ_jhSDb=HHDqg@mail.gmail.com> <23C96FBA-3419-4C97-A075-462F7443013A@vpnc.org> <CAHBU6is2WzCNCwa0PYMM1Hr3Lij0GxWkVtVUan9=JPbvv0YCZg@mail.gmail.com> <CAChr6Sw72kxm8qJiDu=XMnARCttQPc5GNRQaXz4Xw9y+6-3=Mg@mail.gmail.com> <421F79DF-0B88-4E24-8666-189228E6E189@vpnc.org> <524C73B7.1060104@att.com>
To: Tony Hansen <tony@att.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1085)
Cc: JSON WG <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] Differences between RFC 4627 or the current ECMAScript specification
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 02 Oct 2013 20:27:14 -0000

On 02/10/2013, at 21:27, Tony Hansen wrote:
> ******
> 1. Introduction
> 
> JavaScript Object Notation (JSON)

No, "JavaScript Object Notation" is *not* "JSON".

JSON is based on, and a subset of, the JavaScript Object Notation.

-- 
( Jorge )();

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email