Re: [Json] -0.0

John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> Fri, 27 September 2013 22:41 UTC

Return-Path: <cowan@ccil.org>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A634811E8102 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 15:41:57 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.289
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.289 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.310, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TYjRusWQkJyg for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 15:41:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from earth.ccil.org (earth.ccil.org [192.190.237.11]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1D00811E8114 for <json@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 15:41:52 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from cowan by earth.ccil.org with local (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from <cowan@ccil.org>) id 1VPgjM-0003sh-Lk; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 18:41:48 -0400
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 18:41:48 -0400
From: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
To: R S <sayrer@gmail.com>
Message-ID: <20130927224148.GE24460@mercury.ccil.org>
References: <CAChr6SyznBktmOLpT-EiZ5Nm_0jZ16M0tOo4aZ_jhSDb=HHDqg@mail.gmail.com> <6D5CFCAD-5B75-4246-BE42-D42E4D35C344@vpnc.org> <CAChr6SzEBdgF_Cv2ZnC1Oo2CnL06dwZqsOKA=HTVkgArcTyLEw@mail.gmail.com> <CAHBU6iu=LbwcZgEPzKgurR7s+jCUeVMEagq1knzOBWUky9SLoA@mail.gmail.com> <52454988.5030706@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <20130927214137.GC24460@mercury.ccil.org> <BF7E36B9C495A6468E8EC573603ED9411EF1E1E5@xmb-aln-x11.cisco.com> <CAChr6SxfAv+yjEzsn2R=S79MviRN+bYak=8Nnnkw9hfs3p1zxw@mail.gmail.com> <CAChr6SxYSzXGf5hrVNvmdmpHU2R+cKSH+37NhTc--6iDpfXG3g@mail.gmail.com> <CAChr6SwMbYR2pG0R3jqTxCp2Ve=fRsm9ELUe7+EvzVtSVNoc6A@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAChr6SwMbYR2pG0R3jqTxCp2Ve=fRsm9ELUe7+EvzVtSVNoc6A@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Sender: John Cowan <cowan@ccil.org>
Cc: "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, JSON WG <json@ietf.org>, Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, "Matt Miller (mamille2)" <mamille2@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Json] -0.0
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 22:41:57 -0000

R S scripsit:

> I think this thread and the text in the draft shows that the WG didn't
> fully understand what the chairs took to be consensus. It was nearly
> a mistake, but it would have been *fine* if the WG let the existing
> "implementations may place limitations on the range of numbers accepted"
> text stand. Why not do that?

Failure to distinguish between zero and negative zero is not a limitation
of range.

Limitations of precision are not limitations of range.

-- 
If you have ever wondered if you are in hell,       John Cowan
it has been said, then you are on a well-traveled   http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
road of spiritual inquiry.  If you are absolutely   cowan@ccil.org
sure you are in hell, however, then you must be
on the Cross Bronx Expressway.          --Alan Feuer, NYTimes, 2002-09-20