IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Json] -0.0

R S <sayrer@gmail.com> Thu, 26 September 2013 20:39 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6C07521F9D2C for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 13:39:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.000, BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id vg3JPAfopKCY for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 13:39:20 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qc0-x229.google.com (mail-qc0-x229.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c01::229]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D1D4B21F964C for <json@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 13:39:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qc0-f169.google.com with SMTP id c9so1147634qcz.14 for <json@ietf.org>; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 13:39:15 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=SNU+qRNJEeknX109yIoSKTlNdkNsXYIwhXZY1AUpPtk=; b=RbAw3lN1u/tIJL0L/fuLExKGDTuq7wgWPqQ/rkRuVhEHoups/820nOvIOvquwwZ4qR TGBp8TFLXamUFMWNu7gLALOMD1KEzqVCmT6nH4yZmgH5afYAyfb9MomHgBHPQskAHkdN jZBUpgGldfuJGYOtpqukLuwVnaWTI2ijE9srTwkhmSAjQYHsGzWkRwFed4S5HYO6ucUi 7MHJc/0nFfZuTW3kWCskvVOHXtaxDsHMz8OmnKRLX+0iWiJfisdNloDTCeRIxVks27MG MFGxzu+xVyI+/yaHSQnaHI2Yrav+DRyM8NnOCPme+aIhgqkR4KvAFhEtMuyyZzczzEYK KreA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.224.167.18 with SMTP id o18mr9127526qay.87.1380227955812; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 13:39:15 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.140.86.147 with HTTP; Thu, 26 Sep 2013 13:39:15 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <20130926193110.GA8186@mercury.ccil.org>
References: <BF7E36B9C495A6468E8EC573603ED9411EF1BB0B@xmb-aln-x11.cisco.com> <CAChr6SyznBktmOLpT-EiZ5Nm_0jZ16M0tOo4aZ_jhSDb=HHDqg@mail.gmail.com> <6D5CFCAD-5B75-4246-BE42-D42E4D35C344@vpnc.org> <CAChr6SzEBdgF_Cv2ZnC1Oo2CnL06dwZqsOKA=HTVkgArcTyLEw@mail.gmail.com> <20130926193110.GA8186@mercury.ccil.org>
Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 13:39:15 -0700
Message-ID: <CAChr6Sz4J0AfUaQcdGQHE4wiDrOqc-3Uw-WhQjZNsjZdc8L06Q@mail.gmail.com>
From: R S <sayrer@gmail.com>
To: John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="089e01294f5a04019404e74f5d37"
Cc: Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, JSON WG <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] -0.0
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 26 Sep 2013 20:39:20 -0000

On Thu, Sep 26, 2013 at 12:31 PM, John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org> wrote:


> > Most implementations can be relied upon to preserve signed zeros.
>
> Evidence for this statement is lacking.
>

Well, I wrote a widely-used implementation. And all of the implementations
I use, including the C one, handle it. It is part of JSON, after all.

I think the burden of proof is on those that want to leave this text in.

- Rob

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email