IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Json] -0.0

R S <sayrer@gmail.com> Fri, 27 September 2013 22:15 UTC

Return-Path: <sayrer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: json@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57D9621F9D71 for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 15:15:11 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NO_RELAYS=-0.001]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id EuaB6j9urixZ for <json@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 15:15:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qe0-x22e.google.com (mail-qe0-x22e.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c02::22e]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E783F21F9DC9 for <json@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 15:15:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qe0-f46.google.com with SMTP id x7so2268060qeu.5 for <json@ietf.org>; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 15:15:09 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=hjMyK116/JlD9SAi/5CqBkEumZXjXchcsj3nxesed4A=; b=KGqRQGBPJ8RCxghSgr3T1GR+zYtrn9jSCwFfqOYE/HtafUaO4U8Ngs9xiTG/5MaIgI UdCw8L2gKMBEGuhaaBWvNnAN1e2gZnTtO7ZxH+C5eaCINUh9IlSPnzbEOhE8WUP4ma8c 0Qc8Q1m9AfQLL13zDmBfEA6vBlt5uzwU11IbDZZ1uYDb+rRlEDqjUT/Ikk/1k/75uvrR 0ISHfD3bA9Wde+Wf7wvV0hcRAFL0KZQqmAUa32mSCYJLbJZKDhlxiBrEhI0vOCijKjZA 5g4AH84wlrMhLCBVXMyV+Y52iCYQviItZwqnwJszYbsqyV5AcAKp87Js6i1uaqPPDrNh A2uA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.49.81.237 with SMTP id d13mr12043676qey.44.1380320109272; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 15:15:09 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.140.86.147 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 15:15:09 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAChr6SxfAv+yjEzsn2R=S79MviRN+bYak=8Nnnkw9hfs3p1zxw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <BF7E36B9C495A6468E8EC573603ED9411EF1BB0B@xmb-aln-x11.cisco.com> <CAChr6SyznBktmOLpT-EiZ5Nm_0jZ16M0tOo4aZ_jhSDb=HHDqg@mail.gmail.com> <6D5CFCAD-5B75-4246-BE42-D42E4D35C344@vpnc.org> <CAChr6SzEBdgF_Cv2ZnC1Oo2CnL06dwZqsOKA=HTVkgArcTyLEw@mail.gmail.com> <CAHBU6iu=LbwcZgEPzKgurR7s+jCUeVMEagq1knzOBWUky9SLoA@mail.gmail.com> <52454988.5030706@it.aoyama.ac.jp> <20130927214137.GC24460@mercury.ccil.org> <BF7E36B9C495A6468E8EC573603ED9411EF1E1E5@xmb-aln-x11.cisco.com> <CAChr6SxfAv+yjEzsn2R=S79MviRN+bYak=8Nnnkw9hfs3p1zxw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 15:15:09 -0700
Message-ID: <CAChr6SxYSzXGf5hrVNvmdmpHU2R+cKSH+37NhTc--6iDpfXG3g@mail.gmail.com>
From: R S <sayrer@gmail.com>
To: "Matt Miller (mamille2)" <mamille2@cisco.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="047d7b6d9992ca261c04e764d1bf"
Cc: Tim Bray <tbray@textuality.com>, "Martin J. Dürst" <duerst@it.aoyama.ac.jp>, John Cowan <cowan@mercury.ccil.org>, Paul Hoffman <paul.hoffman@vpnc.org>, JSON WG <json@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Json] -0.0
X-BeenThere: json@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "JavaScript Object Notation \(JSON\) WG mailing list" <json.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/json>
List-Post: <mailto:json@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/json>, <mailto:json-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 22:15:11 -0000

On Friday, September 27, 2013, R S wrote:

> On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 2:48 PM, Matt Miller (mamille2) <
> mamille2@cisco.com <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', 'mamille2@cisco.com');>>wrote:
>
>>
>> It appears to me that we are rehashing arguments made when this text was
>> first discussed.  Are we bringing up any new considerations here?
>>
>
> Yes. The text in the current draft refers to both -0 and -0.0 as though
> they are interoperable.
>

Rather, it refers to them both as though they have the same
interoperability considerations.

- Rob

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email