IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [106attendees] Paperless arrival card

Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Thu, 14 November 2019 03:32 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: 106attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 106attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F25111200E3 for <106attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 19:32:54 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.279
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.279 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_INVALID=0.1, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, KHOP_HELO_FCRDNS=0.4, MAY_BE_FORGED=0.001, T_SPF_HELO_PERMERROR=0.01, T_SPF_PERMERROR=0.01] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=fail (1024-bit key) reason="fail (message has been altered)" header.d=nostrum.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id jkWXRNNrIHC4 for <106attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 19:32:54 -0800 (PST)
Received: from nostrum.com (raven-v6.nostrum.com [IPv6:2001:470:d:1130::1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F3EC112006B for <106attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 19:32:53 -0800 (PST)
Received: from [192.168.127.239] (mta-70-120-123-175.stx.rr.com [70.120.123.175] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by nostrum.com (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id xAE3WoJa043661 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Wed, 13 Nov 2019 21:32:51 -0600 (CST) (envelope-from ben@nostrum.com)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=nostrum.com; s=default; t=1573702372; bh=r0ti/HZftWZM0rDQvIY6yR8EtsOqJUuFDJCUAS+mG9k=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=Tzg3v2emp5aVIeMRz0SLb+oIOTIgFi+fBxhRPZU4Ms72XY6pX6mGrC3mCSKobHB94 k+LEJSftebvI76kgdfaXZBtgmIuRUYX87IBS4oV24azmBT3snWIqBO2qRKMDacsQrl 9pabQ8US1eCDZAXKg8+HIiVuvB6x5SPAguZm/11k=
X-Authentication-Warning: raven.nostrum.com: Host mta-70-120-123-175.stx.rr.com [70.120.123.175] (may be forged) claimed to be [192.168.127.239]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 13.0 \(3601.0.10\))
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <20191111192146.BB6F9E9FBBF@ary.qy>
Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 21:32:44 -0600
Cc: 106attendees@ietf.org, tale@dd.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <25EBCEC3-456E-46C7-B4CF-DEEA61B5B070@nostrum.com>
References: <20191111192146.BB6F9E9FBBF@ary.qy>
To: John Levine <ietf@johnlevine.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3601.0.10)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/106attendees/GUZqwAkCnv1hR18OvzjGKiesp2Y>
Subject: Re: [106attendees] Paperless arrival card
X-BeenThere: 106attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list of all 106 attendees for official communication <106attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/106attendees>, <mailto:106attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/106attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:106attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:106attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/106attendees>, <mailto:106attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 03:32:55 -0000

What do people put for “Port of Embarkation” when you have connecting flights? Your original point of origin, or the origin of the flight that arrives in Singapore?

Thanks!

Ben.

> On Nov 11, 2019, at 1:21 PM, John Levine <ietf@johnlevine.com> wrote:
> 
> In article <24009.45329.649146.108187@gro.dd.org> you write:
>> Good to hear that they don't care, since I'm guessing a lot of people
>> all over the world will be having a bit of a challenge picking "the
>> less wrong one".  For Vermont, a rural state in the northeastern USA,
>> they only had three political subdivisions available but no obvious
>> pattern at all for how that subset might have been chosen.
> 
> In their app, I picked UNITED STATES, NEW YORK, OTHERS IN NEW YORK.
> We'll see what they think.
> 
> 
> 
> -- 
> 106attendees mailing list
> 106attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/106attendees

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email