IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [106attendees] Paperless arrival card

Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com> Thu, 14 November 2019 04:06 UTC

Return-Path: <gjshep@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: 106attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 106attendees@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A51451200E6 for <106attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 20:06:47 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.998
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.998 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id HEclEDdZfSlB for <106attendees@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 20:06:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-qk1-x731.google.com (mail-qk1-x731.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::731]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4B37612006B for <106attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 20:06:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-qk1-x731.google.com with SMTP id m16so3842538qki.11 for <106attendees@ietf.org>; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 20:06:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc; bh=Mqnxwn+ypomnF405+Kv9fKOwcD9EDIGVWT1FpVUu9fk=; b=oYNR8SdmlRI/iW36cp3i4LrheglD82Y3Ot6uwNCXTq+egWO5SwjlXbplYxSMO79uZk S8EMMXG/D36VA/m1oesWA1giLT5vbnxHr0KNxhf2jTA/JwIJJ3Qi7SDvE4y8hhzN0qSd QbQN1b5nD7+MPJP0Frc2PukamfcqTd0+H3m1WLAYsQMij5cKhdpPSHUpP7OzKYIOcq1y 90vv2mPanciuhwMz7J8NauHv/lTgA+loLUrHk+rs/Tjj4nRVePXuQtUuG27AM4G1NM0S yoKPnbcyYzGzgLCf3NRJKdw21lZdsCCJ4a97erZUjWdHMulb+3ZCgjfCZSPwuGt6XnWF LLoQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:reply-to :from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=Mqnxwn+ypomnF405+Kv9fKOwcD9EDIGVWT1FpVUu9fk=; b=jkuQps1Ey3CoBd7p2SYgN4FIin8wV2mjeN2N1/6z5qiu8zVkEgQ622HY74phssCNcE bjjKz5CQiQJ8ey4AZmzLegCKT2IDb7wwg7JMZD/WZrVLuDF9O2A+pQ+L7Xyb7Jt1YS6G Cbk2InQF+DBgths4/f6vVOqvnouX38vRsfNqTjQbCTwOQQiLnCpY/7iLsUnZha1KZdSO ubtnRdvkYbKVZSgf3kaxOGXTUuya7DM/Ea0BYDWgZl5TYMb9f4ZtabFMEU+hs6+CBkOL TJnze33qMPTHi8FykO2J7UhqnW88vxf6yT4G20xOv65XMBWITXqebcQ3EqpSfWzOR9Xg mvBg==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVw5rFRaOWxORt8DWwqNRh5WTpLRQ5F3cAyE2BWvZrsUzFkOjZ6 HxCqqk6IMA9zOsuhYBuzxD5Uwz4hjNjU9JUj6Oggyodt
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwKHZQqNX9XFBcwENRbeoIh/eXPO/ZNVoiOq1S0Nl1fWC1GVE0JpiSGFqn+gakSpcVU7NYKMF/6FTezfFq4CRM=
X-Received: by 2002:a37:a250:: with SMTP id l77mr5865251qke.455.1573704404279; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 20:06:44 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20191111192146.BB6F9E9FBBF@ary.qy> <25EBCEC3-456E-46C7-B4CF-DEEA61B5B070@nostrum.com>
In-Reply-To: <25EBCEC3-456E-46C7-B4CF-DEEA61B5B070@nostrum.com>
Reply-To: gjshep@gmail.com
From: Greg Shepherd <gjshep@gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 12:06:34 +0800
Message-ID: <CABFReBpJbKoAwbVxnaPGSNGrVcF+=2Tetg9z8Yub=-iAeQDsjg@mail.gmail.com>
To: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
Cc: John Levine <ietf@johnlevine.com>, 106attendees@ietf.org, tale@dd.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000ffa4910597469ba0"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/106attendees/_F9l9Yk0my5KZgTXRFfH_iHib50>
Subject: Re: [106attendees] Paperless arrival card
X-BeenThere: 106attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Mailing list of all 106 attendees for official communication <106attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/106attendees>, <mailto:106attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/106attendees/>
List-Post: <mailto:106attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:106attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/106attendees>, <mailto:106attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 04:06:48 -0000

I always put down last port. Some forms ask for that specifically.

I arrived last night and the agent had my e-form info as soon as my
passport was scanned.



On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 11:33 AM Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> wrote:

> What do people put for “Port of Embarkation” when you have connecting
> flights? Your original point of origin, or the origin of the flight that
> arrives in Singapore?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Ben.
>
> > On Nov 11, 2019, at 1:21 PM, John Levine <ietf@johnlevine.com> wrote:
> >
> > In article <24009.45329.649146.108187@gro.dd.org> you write:
> >> Good to hear that they don't care, since I'm guessing a lot of people
> >> all over the world will be having a bit of a challenge picking "the
> >> less wrong one".  For Vermont, a rural state in the northeastern USA,
> >> they only had three political subdivisions available but no obvious
> >> pattern at all for how that subset might have been chosen.
> >
> > In their app, I picked UNITED STATES, NEW YORK, OTHERS IN NEW YORK.
> > We'll see what they think.
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > 106attendees mailing list
> > 106attendees@ietf.org
> > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/106attendees
>
> --
> 106attendees mailing list
> 106attendees@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/106attendees
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email