Re: [68ATTENDEES] Hilton Prague
"David T. Perkins" <dperkins@dsperkins.com> Thu, 29 March 2007 21:35 UTC
Return-path: <68attendees-bounces@ietf.org>
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (helo=stiedprmman1.va.neustar.com) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HX2HB-000349-1u; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 17:35:21 -0400
Received: from [10.91.34.44] (helo=ietf-mx.ietf.org) by megatron.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HX2HA-0002zk-1y for 68attendees@ietf.org; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 17:35:20 -0400
Received: from shell4.bayarea.net ([209.128.82.1]) by ietf-mx.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HX2H8-0000Sf-Jm for 68attendees@ietf.org; Thu, 29 Mar 2007 17:35:20 -0400
Received: (qmail 8770 invoked from network); 29 Mar 2007 14:35:15 -0700
Received: from shell4.bayarea.net (209.128.82.1) by shell4.bayarea.net with (DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted) SMTP; 29 Mar 2007 14:35:15 -0700
Date: Thu, 29 Mar 2007 14:35:15 -0700
From: "David T. Perkins" <dperkins@dsperkins.com>
X-X-Sender: dperkins@shell4.bayarea.net
To: Ole Jacobsen <ole@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [68ATTENDEES] Hilton Prague
In-Reply-To: <Pine.GSO.4.63.0703240423240.14393@pita.cisco.com>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.64.0703291419480.28266@shell4.bayarea.net>
References: <OF921C80D0.18881DC6-ON852572A7.002E178E-852572A7.002E8964@csc.com> <460392E7.4010106@kniveton.com> <20070323082654.P70313@protagonist.smi.sendmail.com> <p06240605c229fc1408eb@[[10.0.0.54]]> <0D436C90-6512-47E6-9D26-75D4963F6C4D@tzi.org> <9FFFE437-BC98-4EBA-BA70-FEC661E90552@cisco.com> <Pine.GSO.4.63.0703240423240.14393@pita.cisco.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
X-Spam-Score: 0.0 (/)
X-Scan-Signature: a2c12dacc0736f14d6b540e805505a86
Cc: 68attendees@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: 68attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Mailing list for IETF 68 attendees." <68attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/68attendees>, <mailto:68attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www1.ietf.org/pipermail/68attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:68attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:68attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/68attendees>, <mailto:68attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: 68attendees-bounces@ietf.org
HI, Please consider people on a budget.... For Prague, I stayed at a small hotel within a 10 minute walk that cost only US$ 40 per night. There were plenty of easily walkable places to eat (and get beer) for a reasonable cost. I didn't have any local transportation costs, other than a taxi to/from the airport (better to be safe and on time than to save money in a local where you don't know or speak the language!) My air from San Francisco was about US$800. The IETF conference fee was more than my food and lodging costs! I found Prague quite interesting, and other than the smoke, in a word fantastic. I don't particularily like San Diego due to the high cost of local lodging, and the distance to places to eat. Of course if I was setting the local, I'd choose Cozumel in November/December (it has good Internet connectivity, and that date is out of the hurricane season, and still during low rate season. Plus, there are lots of places to eat, drink, and inexpensive places to stay.) The only problem will be convincing your manager the trip is business and not a junket. Another place that should be a winner is Madrid. Regards, /david t. perkins On Sat, 24 Mar 2007, Ole Jacobsen wrote: > > Asia suggestions: > > - Tokyo/Yokohama area: many choices. Other parts of Japan would work > too, but I suppose it could be argued that they "add another hop" > for International travellers. Many flights to Tokyo, Osaka, or > Nagoya. Specifically, Pacifico Yokohama is well-known to many of > us as a fine facility. > > - Kuala Lumpur: Has a great convention center (probably more than one > but anyway). Has low-cost hotels which are really nice, is easy to > get to from most parts of the world, either directly or via > Singapore. > > - Singapore: Many fine hotels and convention facilities, probably more > expensive than KL, but certainly workable. > > - Taipei: TWNIC has hosted several APNIC meetings here and will host > their second APRICOT in Taipei in 2008. Again nice facilities and > a host (without having asked them) who is more than capable of doing > a meeting the size of the IETF. Big added bonus: If there is only > "one China" then meeting in Taipei means we meet in China with none > of the negotiations you've faced with the other China. How's that > for "sending a message" ? ;-) > > - Hong Kong: Same bonus as above, at least two convention centers > (assuming we need that), many flights to all of the world. I do > hear that the major venues are booked out many years in advance > however. Did I mention it's in China? :-) > > - Seoul: Been there, done that, but it worked pretty well. It's nice > to be in a place where LCD panels grow on trees... Could have chosen > a slightly warmer time of the year perhaps. Again many flight > connections. > > Ole > > Ole J. Jacobsen > Editor and Publisher, The Internet Protocol Journal > Cisco Systems > Tel: +1 408-527-8972 GSM: +1 415-370-4628 > E-mail: ole@cisco.com URL: http://www.cisco.com/ipj > > > On Sat, 24 Mar 2007, Fred Baker wrote: > >> >> On Mar 24, 2007, at 11:09 AM, Carsten Bormann wrote: >> >>> My vote is to make Prague the new Minneapolis. >> >> while keeping the old minneapolis, and perhaps adding san diego to the list. >> yes. >> >> What site(s) would you suggest in Asia as a to-be-repeated site? >> > > _______________________________________________ > 68ATTENDEES mailing list > 68ATTENDEES@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/68attendees > _______________________________________________ 68ATTENDEES mailing list 68ATTENDEES@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/68attendees
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Hilton Prague Schliesser, Benson
- [68ATTENDEES] Hilton Prague Mark Pullen
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Hilton Prague Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Hilton Prague Ray Pelletier
- RE: [68ATTENDEES] Hilton Prague Arnoud van Wijk
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Hilton Prague Janet P Gunn
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Hilton Prague Ben Campbell
- RE: [68ATTENDEES] Hilton Prague Arnoud van Wijk
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Hilton Prague T.J. Kniveton
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Hilton Prague Richard Pruss
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Hilton Prague Janet P Gunn
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Hilton Prague Fred Baker
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Hilton Prague Tony Hansen
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Hilton Prague Gonzalo Camarillo
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Hilton Prague Joao Damas
- RE: [68ATTENDEES] Hilton Prague Eastlake III Donald-LDE008
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Hilton Prague Janet P Gunn
- RE: [68ATTENDEES] Hilton Prague Antoin Verschuren
- RE: [68ATTENDEES] Hilton Prague GOLDMAN, STUART O (STUART)
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Hilton Prague Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Hilton Prague Murray S. Kucherawy
- Price of the Internet connection (was: Re: [68ATT… John C Klensin
- Plumbing (was:Re: [68ATTENDEES] Hilton Prague) John C Klensin
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Hilton Prague Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: Plumbing (was:Re: [68ATTENDEES] Hilton Prague) Patrik Fältström
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Hilton Prague Michal Krsek
- Re: Plumbing (was:Re: [68ATTENDEES] Hilton Prague) Otmar Lendl
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Hilton Prague Randall Gellens
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Hilton Prague Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Hilton Prague Carsten Bormann
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Hilton Prague Fred Baker
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Hilton Prague Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Hilton Prague Tony Li
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Hilton Prague Tim Chown
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Hilton Prague Michael Richardson
- RE: [68ATTENDEES] Hilton Prague Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Hilton Prague Randall Gellens
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Hilton Prague Otmar Lendl
- Re: [68ATTENDEES] Hilton Prague David T. Perkins