IETF Logo Mail Archive

[6tsch] About the special type of event to ask PCE to create a track

"Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com> Fri, 30 August 2013 16:08 UTC

Return-Path: <pthubert@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: 6tsch@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 6tsch@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D7F9021E808F for <6tsch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 09:08:27 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -10.265
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.265 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.266, BAYES_00=-2.599, J_CHICKENPOX_34=0.6, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-8]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id KOUFawuZntZv for <6tsch@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 09:08:22 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com [173.37.86.74]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50AD221E8087 for <6tsch@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 09:08:22 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=560; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1377878902; x=1379088502; h=from:to:subject:date:message-id: content-transfer-encoding:mime-version; bh=+9USM6QbS5sb2cqA6mRQcM3wd4reL9nWGN4OiTCXiQs=; b=UR+1DRCxm/l+hqqRiqcBU/Y+zCvJo7JZpvRfopLiNNKUMVGPc3ry/6K2 xfbzzNtGRQulN86fd9ClrgAf+TcDO4M94ioPcEQkP3/gUFyl/qgOw3IM+ AVBQXSuI5f8cD2LqPp3nefz7NPLOxtBhWJIqaZxKgBGLW8FuvIZwKfvPU k=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AmUGAEXCIFKtJXG9/2dsb2JhbABagweBBr9AgQ+BHhZtB4ImAQQ6LSQBKhRCJgEEG4d5mFehNI9Dg1SBAAOpWYMggio
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.89,992,1367971200"; d="scan'208";a="253808924"
Received: from rcdn-core2-2.cisco.com ([173.37.113.189]) by rcdn-iport-3.cisco.com with ESMTP; 30 Aug 2013 16:08:20 +0000
Received: from xhc-rcd-x06.cisco.com (xhc-rcd-x06.cisco.com [173.37.183.80]) by rcdn-core2-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id r7UG8KQ9017144 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL) for <6tsch@ietf.org>; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 16:08:20 GMT
Received: from xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com ([169.254.1.31]) by xhc-rcd-x06.cisco.com ([173.37.183.80]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Fri, 30 Aug 2013 11:08:20 -0500
From: "Pascal Thubert (pthubert)" <pthubert@cisco.com>
To: "6tsch@ietf.org" <6tsch@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: About the special type of event to ask PCE to create a track
Thread-Index: Ac6lmv6UDqCTdsa9SmO4Ef5o8dIVRA==
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 16:08:20 +0000
Deferred-Delivery: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 16:08:00 +0000
Message-ID: <E045AECD98228444A58C61C200AE1BD841433684@xmb-rcd-x01.cisco.com>
Accept-Language: fr-FR, en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.55.22.3]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: [6tsch] About the special type of event to ask PCE to create a track
X-BeenThere: 6tsch@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Discuss link layer model for Deterministic IPv6 over the TSCH mode of IEEE 802.15.4e, and impacts on RPL and 6LoWPAN such as resource allocation" <6tsch.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/6tsch>, <mailto:6tsch-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/6tsch>
List-Post: <mailto:6tsch@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:6tsch-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/6tsch>, <mailto:6tsch-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 16:08:28 -0000

Dear all,

We discussed at the call that the(PCEP?) request to ask for a track establishment could be seen as an event, or could be a new flow.
At the call, I suggested that it could be a new, 5th flow. My arguments are that this flow:
- Probably yields different data format. The demand carries and points, end to end latency and bandwidth. That's quite specific.
- Probably yields a different flow. Events do not necessarily have a response. 
- Probably uses a different transport as well (PCEP vs. CoAP)

What do you think?

Pascal

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email