Re: [79attendees] beijing ietf network
Ed Jankiewicz <edward.jankiewicz@sri.com> Fri, 12 November 2010 04:16 UTC
Return-Path: <edward.jankiewicz@sri.com>
X-Original-To: 79attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 79attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4764C3A67E7 for <79attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 20:16:53 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.94
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.94 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.106, BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_MISMATCH_COM=0.553]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R7nNmkrmD4DJ for <79attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 20:16:52 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail1.sri.com (mail1.SRI.COM [128.18.30.17]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 97E893A67B8 for <79attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 20:16:52 -0800 (PST)
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-transfer-encoding: 7bit
Content-type: text/plain; CHARSET="US-ASCII"; format="flowed"
Received: from [130.129.64.180] ([unknown] [130.129.64.180]) by mail.sri.com (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 7u2-7.05 32bit (built Jul 30 2009)) with ESMTPSA id <0LBR00A8E7WZ4BZ0@mail.sri.com> for 79attendees@ietf.org; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 20:17:24 -0800 (PST)
Message-id: <4CDCBFD3.1040904@sri.com>
Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 12:17:23 +0800
From: Ed Jankiewicz <edward.jankiewicz@sri.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.9.2.12) Gecko/20101027 Thunderbird/3.1.6
To: 79attendees@ietf.org
References: <m2r5ernsix.wl%randy@psg.com>
In-reply-to: <m2r5ernsix.wl%randy@psg.com>
Subject: Re: [79attendees] beijing ietf network
X-BeenThere: 79attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 79 attendees list <79attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/79attendees>, <mailto:79attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/79attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:79attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:79attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/79attendees>, <mailto:79attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 04:16:53 -0000
ditto, adding of course that the NOC volunteers play a critical role matching local capabilities to inordinate demands of IETFers. You folks understand our "use cases" as well as our "abuse cases" and there is no way any local operation, hotel or otherwise, can be prepared for what 1300 overequipped geeks can do to a network, without the NOC volunteers to provide the reality check. It's a tough crowd, and a challenging set of requirements. This instance of The Network seemed to be one of the best ever. No problems, no complaints. Believe me, folks certainly notice when things are not working well, because we are utterly dependent on this network to get through the week, and making it to Friday without any significant issues or complaints is a top shelf achievement. Almost as good as the international breakfast buffet at the Shangri-La. Thanks again. On 11/12/2010 11:13 AM, Randy Bush wrote: > as the end of the tunnel is in sight, i just wanted to say that the > meeting network provided by our hosts, tsinghua university and drs wu, > li, and zhao was first class, and working under their team was a > pleasure. very very impressive. > > you don't notice when net ops is working well, only when it breaks. :) > > randy, ocd, add > _______________________________________________ > 79attendees mailing list > 79attendees@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/79attendees
- Re: [79attendees] beijing ietf network Jakob Heitz
- [79attendees] beijing ietf network Randy Bush
- [79attendees] Re : beijing ietf network Dodi MBUTA
- Re: [79attendees] beijing ietf network Bob Hinden
- Re: [79attendees] beijing ietf network Ed Jankiewicz
- Re: [79attendees] beijing ietf network Fred Baker
- Re: [79attendees] beijing ietf network Lu, Hui-Lan (Huilan)
- Re: [79attendees] beijing ietf network Mark Prior
- Re: [79attendees] beijing ietf network hermin anggawijaya
- Re: [79attendees] beijing ietf network Randall Gellens
- Re: [79attendees] beijing ietf network Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [79attendees] beijing ietf network Randall Gellens
- Re: [79attendees] beijing ietf network Charles E. Perkins
- Re: [79attendees] beijing ietf network Karen Seo
- Re: [79attendees] beijing ietf network Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [79attendees] beijing ietf network Khoudia Gueye SY
- Re: [79attendees] beijing ietf network Dodi MBUTA
- Re: [79attendees] beijing ietf network Marco Davids
- Re: [79attendees] beijing ietf network Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [79attendees] beijing ietf network LEVRAU, LIEVEN (LIEVEN)
- Re: [79attendees] beijing ietf network Randall Gellens
- [79attendees] Oops -- what were they _thinking_? Charles E. Perkins
- Re: [79attendees] Oops -- what were they _thinkin… Henk Uijterwaal
- Re: [79attendees] Oops -- what were they _thinkin… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [79attendees] Oops -- what were they _thinkin… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [79attendees] Oops -- what were they _thinkin… Charles E. Perkins
- Re: [79attendees] Oops -- what were they _thinkin… Marshall Eubanks
- Re: [79attendees] Oops -- what were they _thinkin… Randy Bush
- Re: [79attendees] Oops -- what were they _thinkin… Bob Hinden
- Re: [79attendees] Oops -- what were they _thinkin… Charles E. Perkins
- Re: [79attendees] Oops -- what were they _thinkin… Charles E. Perkins
- Re: [79attendees] Oops -- what were they _thinkin… Dave Crocker