Re: [79attendees] beijing ietf network
Randall Gellens <randy@qualcomm.com> Fri, 12 November 2010 05:17 UTC
Return-Path: <randy@qualcomm.com>
X-Original-To: 79attendees@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: 79attendees@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F83C3A6943 for <79attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 21:17:08 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.499
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.499 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.100, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id nsHbbItuHzuz for <79attendees@core3.amsl.com>; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 21:17:00 -0800 (PST)
Received: from wolverine02.qualcomm.com (wolverine02.qualcomm.com [199.106.114.251]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 81A613A684F for <79attendees@ietf.org>; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 21:17:00 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=qualcomm.com; i=randy@qualcomm.com; q=dns/txt; s=qcdkim; t=1289539052; x=1321075052; h=message-id:in-reply-to:references:x-mailer:date:to:from: subject:mime-version:content-type:x-random-sig-tag; z=Message-ID:=20<p06240600c9027e52db77@dhcp-25b9.meeting.i etf.org>|In-Reply-To:=20<4CDCBFD3.1040904@sri.com> |References:=20<m2r5ernsix.wl%randy@psg.com>=20<4CDCBFD3. 1040904@sri.com>|X-Mailer:=20Eudora=20for=20Mac=20OS=20X |Date:=20Thu,=2011=20Nov=202010=2021:17:25=20-0800|To:=20 Ed=20Jankiewicz=20<edward.jankiewicz@sri.com>,=20<79atten dees@ietf.org>|From:=20Randall=20Gellens=20<randy@qualcom m.com>|Subject:=20Re:=20[79attendees]=20beijing=20ietf=20 network|MIME-Version:=201.0|Content-Type:=20text/plain=3B =20charset=3D"us-ascii"=3B=20format=3Dflowed |X-Random-Sig-Tag:=201.0b28; bh=HvkPzZC+mjSH2+u0bDBbFIHK6eWef7XMDevHlNAIr6Q=; b=xyw8iM62R9MiHeyR/MNRoAW2iytZpGk9ZuW4Lydj+uOxhmHZ30TxPWc2 4DoKOOv9AlNimWdaDU6B+jGXfnqOfk4CuQhIkFVEisSnj1JuVF0bunNqf 2gwczRx21CU95wD+AB5JkZA+bsUqawhC46bz0RHxj1Nc4ab85o6PVrkn1 I=;
X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="5400,1158,6164"; a="61594203"
Received: from ironmsg02-r.qualcomm.com ([172.30.46.16]) by wolverine02.qualcomm.com with ESMTP; 11 Nov 2010 21:17:30 -0800
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.59,186,1288594800"; d="scan'208";a="91588653"
Received: from nasanexhub01.na.qualcomm.com ([10.46.93.121]) by ironmsg02-R.qualcomm.com with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-MD5; 11 Nov 2010 21:17:30 -0800
Received: from nasanexmsp01.na.qualcomm.com (10.45.56.204) by nasanexhub01.na.qualcomm.com (10.46.93.121) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.83.0; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 21:17:30 -0800
Received: from dhcp-25b9.meeting.ietf.org (10.46.82.6) by qcmail1.qualcomm.com (10.45.56.204) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.83.0; Thu, 11 Nov 2010 21:17:29 -0800
Message-ID: <p06240600c9027e52db77@dhcp-25b9.meeting.ietf.org>
In-Reply-To: <4CDCBFD3.1040904@sri.com>
References: <m2r5ernsix.wl%randy@psg.com> <4CDCBFD3.1040904@sri.com>
X-Mailer: Eudora for Mac OS X
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2010 21:17:25 -0800
To: Ed Jankiewicz <edward.jankiewicz@sri.com>, 79attendees@ietf.org
From: Randall Gellens <randy@qualcomm.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
X-Random-Sig-Tag: 1.0b28
Subject: Re: [79attendees] beijing ietf network
X-BeenThere: 79attendees@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: IETF 79 attendees list <79attendees.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/79attendees>, <mailto:79attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/79attendees>
List-Post: <mailto:79attendees@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:79attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/79attendees>, <mailto:79attendees-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Nov 2010 05:17:08 -0000
+1 Thank you! At 12:17 PM +0800 11/12/10, Ed Jankiewicz wrote: > ditto, adding of course that the NOC volunteers play a critical > role matching local capabilities to inordinate demands of IETFers. > You folks understand our "use cases" as well as our "abuse cases" > and there is no way any local operation, hotel or otherwise, can be > prepared for what 1300 overequipped geeks can do to a network, > without the NOC volunteers to provide the reality check. > > It's a tough crowd, and a challenging set of requirements. This > instance of The Network seemed to be one of the best ever. No > problems, no complaints. Believe me, folks certainly notice when > things are not working well, because we are utterly dependent on > this network to get through the week, and making it to Friday > without any significant issues or complaints is a top shelf > achievement. > > Almost as good as the international breakfast buffet at the Shangri-La. > > Thanks again. > > On 11/12/2010 11:13 AM, Randy Bush wrote: >> as the end of the tunnel is in sight, i just wanted to say that the >> meeting network provided by our hosts, tsinghua university and drs wu, >> li, and zhao was first class, and working under their team was a >> pleasure. very very impressive. >> >> you don't notice when net ops is working well, only when it breaks. :) >> >> randy, ocd, add >> _______________________________________________ >> 79attendees mailing list >> 79attendees@ietf.org >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/79attendees > _______________________________________________ > 79attendees mailing list > 79attendees@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/79attendees -- Randall Gellens Opinions are personal; facts are suspect; I speak for myself only -------------- Randomly selected tag: --------------- We must abandon the prevalent belief in the superior wisdom of the ignorant. --Daniel J. Boorstin
- Re: [79attendees] beijing ietf network Jakob Heitz
- [79attendees] beijing ietf network Randy Bush
- [79attendees] Re : beijing ietf network Dodi MBUTA
- Re: [79attendees] beijing ietf network Bob Hinden
- Re: [79attendees] beijing ietf network Ed Jankiewicz
- Re: [79attendees] beijing ietf network Fred Baker
- Re: [79attendees] beijing ietf network Lu, Hui-Lan (Huilan)
- Re: [79attendees] beijing ietf network Mark Prior
- Re: [79attendees] beijing ietf network hermin anggawijaya
- Re: [79attendees] beijing ietf network Randall Gellens
- Re: [79attendees] beijing ietf network Stephane Bortzmeyer
- Re: [79attendees] beijing ietf network Randall Gellens
- Re: [79attendees] beijing ietf network Charles E. Perkins
- Re: [79attendees] beijing ietf network Karen Seo
- Re: [79attendees] beijing ietf network Brian E Carpenter
- Re: [79attendees] beijing ietf network Khoudia Gueye SY
- Re: [79attendees] beijing ietf network Dodi MBUTA
- Re: [79attendees] beijing ietf network Marco Davids
- Re: [79attendees] beijing ietf network Jeff Tantsura
- Re: [79attendees] beijing ietf network LEVRAU, LIEVEN (LIEVEN)
- Re: [79attendees] beijing ietf network Randall Gellens
- [79attendees] Oops -- what were they _thinking_? Charles E. Perkins
- Re: [79attendees] Oops -- what were they _thinkin… Henk Uijterwaal
- Re: [79attendees] Oops -- what were they _thinkin… Ole Jacobsen
- Re: [79attendees] Oops -- what were they _thinkin… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [79attendees] Oops -- what were they _thinkin… Charles E. Perkins
- Re: [79attendees] Oops -- what were they _thinkin… Marshall Eubanks
- Re: [79attendees] Oops -- what were they _thinkin… Randy Bush
- Re: [79attendees] Oops -- what were they _thinkin… Bob Hinden
- Re: [79attendees] Oops -- what were they _thinkin… Charles E. Perkins
- Re: [79attendees] Oops -- what were they _thinkin… Charles E. Perkins
- Re: [79attendees] Oops -- what were they _thinkin… Dave Crocker