IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Add] [Ext] Draft Posting: CNAME Discovery of Local DoH Resolvers

Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org> Wed, 01 July 2020 19:26 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@redbarn.org>
X-Original-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A51D53A0C50 for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 12:26:30 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.898
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.898 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id R2MsBsXOBeWB for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 12:26:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from family.redbarn.org (family.redbarn.org [IPv6:2001:559:8000:cd::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 285373A0C4D for <add@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 12:26:29 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from linux-9daj.localnet (dhcp-166.access.rits.tisf.net [24.104.150.166]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (1024 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by family.redbarn.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CA7A0B0588 for <add@ietf.org>; Wed, 1 Jul 2020 19:26:28 +0000 (UTC)
From: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
To: ADD Mailing list <add@ietf.org>
Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2020 19:26:28 +0000
Message-ID: <7554989.GgB1jQp9Bc@linux-9daj>
Organization: none
In-Reply-To: <CAFpG3gdiidmjxoauBw56ZybRabB6JET1Nh5dzTLQq1k0ZAn6Uw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CABcZeBPTkWeB40wpTowKvEJ-gXA3AL2e-BE+C_FC7Js7-D0DZQ@mail.gmail.com> <4703088.fjZbX7tNNj@linux-9daj> <CAFpG3gdiidmjxoauBw56ZybRabB6JET1Nh5dzTLQq1k0ZAn6Uw@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/add/0Sonymg1FEjV_irkwshs2WqVQ-k>
Subject: Re: [Add] [Ext] Draft Posting: CNAME Discovery of Local DoH Resolvers
X-BeenThere: add@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications Doing DNS <add.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/add/>
List-Post: <mailto:add@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 01 Jul 2020 19:26:31 -0000

On Wednesday, 1 July 2020 11:11:01 UTC tirumal reddy wrote:
> On Wed, 1 Jul 2020 at 13:29, Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org> wrote:
> > On Wednesday, 1 July 2020 05:59:51 UTC Ted Lemon wrote:
> > > On Jul 1, 2020, at 1:34 AM, Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org> wrote:
> > > > as i wrote, there are other network configuration parameters which are
> > > > also valuable targets, such as outbound proxy settings.
> > > 
> > > Who configures those with DHCP? That would be insane.
> > 
> > my IoT devices hate me, because i won't let them speak directly to their
> > motherships, and lacking keyboards or ssh listeners, i have no way to tell
> > them what proxy they would have to use to be successful. if you want me to
> > agree that IoT is insane, i probably will. but it's our world.
> 
> Secure bootstrapping methods for IoT devices are discussed both inside
> (e.g., BRSKI) and outside of IETF (DPP, OCF, OMA).

do you see that problem as specific to IoT, or disjoint from RDNS settings?

(i do not.)

-- 
Paul

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email