Re: [Add] [Ext] Draft Posting: CNAME Discovery of Local DoH Resolvers

Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org> Sun, 28 June 2020 19:23 UTC

Return-Path: <paul@redbarn.org>
X-Original-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: add@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D060E3A0ED3 for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 12:23:17 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ikX-Ir7yavLl for <add@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 12:23:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from family.redbarn.org (family.redbarn.org [IPv6:2001:559:8000:cd::5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ADH-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E4F073A0ED2 for <add@ietf.org>; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 12:23:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from linux-9daj.localnet (dhcp-166.access.rits.tisf.net [24.104.150.166]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (1024 bits) server-digest SHA256) (Client did not present a certificate) by family.redbarn.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5BB5FB0588; Sun, 28 Jun 2020 19:23:15 +0000 (UTC)
From: Paul Vixie <paul@redbarn.org>
To: Michael Richardson <mcr+ietf@sandelman.ca>, add@ietf.org
Cc: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>
Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2020 19:20:24 +0000
Message-ID: <3615321.ADK9YsXCiF@linux-9daj>
Organization: none
In-Reply-To: <alpine.OSX.2.22.407.2006281428200.79151@ary.qy>
References: <CABcZeBPTkWeB40wpTowKvEJ-gXA3AL2e-BE+C_FC7Js7-D0DZQ@mail.gmail.com> <14119.1593367594@localhost> <alpine.OSX.2.22.407.2006281428200.79151@ary.qy>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/add/T-Rxng9RePm7nag69HvLUQwgGU4>
Subject: Re: [Add] [Ext] Draft Posting: CNAME Discovery of Local DoH Resolvers
X-BeenThere: add@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Applications Doing DNS <add.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/add/>
List-Post: <mailto:add@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/add>, <mailto:add-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 28 Jun 2020 19:23:18 -0000

On Sunday, 28 June 2020 18:29:22 UTC John R Levine wrote:
> On Sun, 28 Jun 2020, Michael Richardson wrote:
> >    > Beyond that I gather there is still concern about SOHO routers with
> >    > poorly implemented DNS forwarders that only handle some kinds of
> >    > queries.
> > 
> > I believe that the majority of devices on the market are now based upon
> > versions of openwrt which, even if 10 years out of date, now have only 15
> > year old DNS forwarding code.  And that's new enough.
> 
> It's not what's on sale now, it's what's installed.  People tend to keep
> what they have unless it breaks in ways that are obvious to them.

as we learned with EDNS, we should have broken more stuff sooner. being 
liberal in what we accept and conservative in what we generate has not scaled 
and won't.

-- 
Paul