Re: [Anima] Self-Managed Networks

Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com> Fri, 16 October 2015 05:40 UTC

Return-Path: <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: anima@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E76521B2F01 for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 22:40:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6gcw-HOlWODu for <anima@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 22:40:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pa0-x235.google.com (mail-pa0-x235.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400e:c03::235]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A38321B2EFD for <anima@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 22:40:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by pacfv9 with SMTP id fv9so11579081pac.3 for <anima@ietf.org>; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 22:40:06 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=subject:to:references:cc:from:organization:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=GvOVQbgBxdmYVl2Cr+/ExjplWRwKVrcbaH8z0T6nscs=; b=07yQglX0v8FBrik/NMWl/r9ojhzRGeyBK5ixFeDTbw41w09MUqE62Wi1rkNIy6Q5qV DyhqMCpxHXez+zf5VuHwilyhDQYDdddD2wyTTbFHHF8zimgtN43f7Ua7DQDcnOwXZdmq GB7FadlsK5gUantlfssGQ/4LpVSDDaIzJ/FfD8KQheHTzmSnQ36xSFjEOpzshYK5YmCr FSTMZ+mjE1U0u/fQvueKD39Nj3TZWQHEZgiXh9YpWXmp9C0A3aovrYrcEeSSTHT7JAd4 NfstYhLKmBm5Oe1M0tK8X0FUREyyxZxrDl77+zjxa2gpwHAa8DpFN/VVPWhwtNzeygYh 06mQ==
X-Received: by 10.66.55.41 with SMTP id o9mr14373801pap.44.1444974006179; Thu, 15 Oct 2015 22:40:06 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.137.82] (14-202-184-134.tpgi.com.au. [14.202.184.134]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id ey17sm18823943pac.26.2015.10.15.22.40.02 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 15 Oct 2015 22:40:04 -0700 (PDT)
To: "Toy, Mehmet" <Mehmet_Toy@cable.comcast.com>, Toerless Eckert <eckert@cisco.com>
References: <9accdec6dd894df6afed38215b28b494@VAADCEX36.cable.comcast.com> <20151014231557.GA13294@cisco.com> <5fe9c36320aa4921b12eb0279463d2cb@VAADCEX37.cable.comcast.com> <56202F61.9030300@gmail.com> <c482bc65d2ed463ea6253d0c14fba1a5@VAADCEX37.cable.comcast.com>
From: Brian E Carpenter <brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com>
Organization: University of Auckland
Message-ID: <56208DB9.8070204@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 18:40:09 +1300
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.3.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <c482bc65d2ed463ea6253d0c14fba1a5@VAADCEX37.cable.comcast.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/anima/fbhlTqfEW3KEKEe8GfBqW7-z4fQ>
Cc: "Romascanu, Dan (Dan) (dromasca@avaya.com)" <dromasca@avaya.com>, "anima@ietf.org" <anima@ietf.org>, "mbehring@cisco.com" <mbehring@cisco.com>, "anima-chairs@tools.ietf.org" <anima-chairs@tools.ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [Anima] Self-Managed Networks
X-BeenThere: anima@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Autonomic Networking Integrated Model and Approach <anima.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/anima/>
List-Post: <mailto:anima@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/anima>, <mailto:anima-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Oct 2015 05:40:09 -0000

Mehmet,

ANIMA communication is over a secure L3*, which is exactly the reason that the ACP
is defined as it is. But of course the targets of a use case could be at any level of the
stack.

*except for discovery messages, which cannot always be secure.

Also of course we cannot claim that GRASP is the solution to all problems.
For example, I recently reviewed draft-ietf-pwe3-iccp-stp. There's no
reason we would use GRASP to solve the fault-management problem that's
already solved by ICCP and the 802 spanning tree.

Regards
   Brian Carpenter

On 16/10/2015 17:17, Toy, Mehmet wrote:
> Brian,
> I would have no objection using GRASP (or extended GRASP) for FM communications as long as we can support the network types that we want. I understand that ANIMA is considering only L3 networks.
> I wish we can generalize our approach so that we can cover both L2 and L3.  Despite of my Ethernet example, my approach is applicable to L2 and L3 networks.
> 
> Regards,,
> Mehmet
> 
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Brian E Carpenter [mailto:brian.e.carpenter@gmail.com] 
> Sent: Thursday, October 15, 2015 6:58 PM
> To: Toy, Mehmet; Toerless Eckert
> Cc: anima-chairs@tools.ietf.org; mbehring@cisco.com; Romascanu, Dan (Dan) (dromasca@avaya.com); anima@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: Self-Managed Networks
> 
> Just commenting on one key point:
> 
>> MT: Ethernet frame is just an example. We can collectively decide to have something else. The key point here is to have one message format for all FM related communications.
> 
> Anima has decided to run over a secure layer 3 by default (i.e. the ACP). And our plan is to have a globally applicable signaling protocol (i.e. GRASP). Of course, if GRASP isn't suitable for a given use case, we would have two alternatives 1. Extend GRASP, which is relatively easy thanks to CBOR; 2. Use something else, which has its own complications.
> 
> GRASP can carry any format, YANG if you like, but whether you can model any particular use case is of course TBD.
> Please review https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-anima-grasp
> 
> Regards
>    Brian Carpenter
> 
>