Re: [apps-discuss] Call for adoption of draft-kucherawy-mta-malformed-00.txt as an APPSAWG document

"Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com> Fri, 08 July 2011 14:27 UTC

Return-Path: <msk@cloudmark.com>
X-Original-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D992E21F8902 for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jul 2011 07:27:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.371
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.371 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=-0.772, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id X0E-a-eA+SPD for <apps-discuss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Jul 2011 07:27:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ht2-outbound.cloudmark.com (ht2-outbound.cloudmark.com [72.5.239.36]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 718F921F88C0 for <apps-discuss@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Jul 2011 07:27:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.1.74]) by spite.corp.cloudmark.com ([172.22.10.72]) with mapi; Fri, 8 Jul 2011 07:27:42 -0700
From: "Murray S. Kucherawy" <msk@cloudmark.com>
To: John R Levine <johnl@taugh.com>, Nathaniel Borenstein <nsb@guppylake.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Jul 2011 07:27:41 -0700
Thread-Topic: [apps-discuss] Call for adoption of draft-kucherawy-mta-malformed-00.txt as an APPSAWG document
Thread-Index: Acw9esEOxKjd4aE5S9mLm+K1S1xqbAAAGPPQ
Message-ID: <F5833273385BB34F99288B3648C4F06F134EBC4BE2@EXCH-C2.corp.cloudmark.com>
References: <20110706052247.16131.qmail@joyce.lan> <A93D2D06-E4EF-447C-A3AD-1122A3D5A1EA@guppylake.com> <alpine.BSF.2.00.1107081017070.14085@joyce.lan>
In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.00.1107081017070.14085@joyce.lan>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "apps-discuss@ietf.org" <apps-discuss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Call for adoption of draft-kucherawy-mta-malformed-00.txt as an APPSAWG document
X-BeenThere: apps-discuss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: General discussion of application-layer protocols <apps-discuss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/apps-discuss>
List-Post: <mailto:apps-discuss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/apps-discuss>, <mailto:apps-discuss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Jul 2011 14:27:43 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: apps-discuss-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:apps-discuss-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of John R Levine
> Sent: Friday, July 08, 2011 7:24 AM
> To: Nathaniel Borenstein
> Cc: apps-discuss@ietf.org
> Subject: Re: [apps-discuss] Call for adoption of draft-kucherawy-mta-malformed-00.txt as an APPSAWG document
> 
> Well, I did carefully say MSAs in that sentence.  You're right, picky
> enforcement of RFC 5322 and its predecessors on mail from strangers tends
> to lose more sloppy legit mail than unwanted mail.
> 
> I think it'd be worth noting that MSAs can and should be stricter about
> what they accept than relay MTAs are.

I'd be fine with that.